On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Michael Stahnke
wrote:
> After a very long period of neglect, (sorry), I worked on updating the
> rails stack in EPEL5 to 2.3.18. This includes activesupport, activerecord
> and actionpack thus far. Rails still to come.
>
> Moving from 2.1.x to 2.3.x *should* be
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
913
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
132
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6
28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2748/nodejs-0.10.32-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-14.el7
27
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-2861/nodejs-qs-0.6.6-3.el7
27
https://admin.fedorapr
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
913
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
368
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
132
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat
After a very long period of neglect, (sorry), I worked on updating the
rails stack in EPEL5 to 2.3.18. This includes activesupport, activerecord
and actionpack thus far. Rails still to come.
Moving from 2.1.x to 2.3.x *should* be a clean upgrade, but I know in some
cases it's not, as some security
On 10/11/2014 04:13 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
>
> I’m the primary maintainer in EPEL + Fedora. Would certainly be able to help
> on the CentOS side as well and apply patches as needed.
While some of the patches have different names, it looks like we
(CentOS) have 4 patches that are not included
