The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0610/qpid-cpp-0.30-9.el7
12
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1031
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
486
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
250
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1031
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
121
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3434/pylint-1.3.1-1.el6,python-astroid-1.2.1-2.el6,python-logilab-common-0
#16: xrootd major move to 4.
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Resolution
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:11:46AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Ugh. Good catch! It looks like liblockfile was added to EPEL7 by
> accident.
>
> I opened a ticket[1].
In the future, just retire the package in GIT/pkgdb and everything will
be done correctly.
Regards
Till
__
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:25:41PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > liblockfile is installed with CentOS 7 and it gets updated by EPEL 7.
> > Is that supposed to happen?
>
> No it's not. Added the maintainer [1] who requested it to cc: so
