On 2017-08-01 16:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> RHEL-7.4 was released today and so the build roots for EPEL packages
> will be updated as soon as the automatic reposync is done.
Unfortunately not for aarch64: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6926
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Software Engineer - Platfo
On 07/24/2017 12:42 PM, Dave Love wrote:
Brandon Hsu
writes:
Hi,
I try to compile and install some programs in CentOS 7 which depends on
LAPACK.
I hope to use LAPACK linked to OpenBLAS, which gives better performance
compared to Reference BLAS.
OpenBLAS provides its own LAPACK, which has s
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
755 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
749 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
639 https://bodhi.fedoraproje
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
876 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
639 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
221 https://bodhi.fedorapr
RHEL-7.4 was released today and so the build roots for EPEL packages will
be updated as soon as the automatic reposync is done.
This may cause problems for EPEL builds for CentOS people so please be
careful in pushing items from epel-testing to epel until CentOS is caught
up.
--
Stephen J Smooge
On 08/01/2017 12:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Using the process outlined from:
> https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst
>
> #startmeeting EPEL (2017-08-02)
> #meetingname EPEL
> #topic aloha
> #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge
> #topic Announcem
Using the process outlined from:
https://pagure.io/epel/blob/master/f/docs/source/EPEL-meeting-process.rst
#startmeeting EPEL (2017-08-02)
#meetingname EPEL
#topic aloha
#chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge
#topic Announcements
#info RHEL-7.4 released
#info FLOCK 2017 in 3 weeks
#topic Tick
On 08/01/2017 01:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I will bring this up at the meeting tomorrow, but I believe that the
plan would be something like the following:
1. "Update" the current package with README.deprecated explaining why
the package is being removed from the repository and what
One of things I've invested some time towards over the years is cutting
down on the amount of %if spaghetti needed to share spec files between
Fedora and EPEL. Earlier in the discussion about the mass python-X ->
python2-X move I volunteered to maintain a number of "stub packages" in
EPEL which ha
On 1 August 2017 at 12:32, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously
> out of date, but:
>
> 1) You can't upgrade directly from 0.80.7 to 12.1.1 without upgrading to
> at least 0.94.X and then 10.2.X first, and there are probably other
> int
Building 12.1.1 for EPEL7 would be VERY bad IMNSHO. 0.80.7 _is_ seriously
out of date, but:
1) You can't upgrade directly from 0.80.7 to 12.1.1 without upgrading to at
least 0.94.X and then 10.2.X first, and there are probably other
intermediate steps as well (you'd have to dig through the releas
The last version of Ceph that was built in epel7 was 0.80.7, back in
December, 2016.
That's pretty seriously out of date.
Is anyone going to have any heartache if I build 12.1.1 for epel7?
--
Kaleb
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.f
12 matches
Mail list logo
