https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507#c9
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Other feedbacks?
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Il 25/10/2016 19:07, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> Well, we need more information (or at least I do):
>
> * Is 1.x still supported by upstream?
No
> * is 1.x still supported by anyone else (rhel, other lts distros,
> people you could work with on backporting fixes).
I don't think so, and I have nev
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:07:28AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, we need more information (or at least I do):
> * Is 1.x still supported by upstream?
I don't think so -- the last commit to the "darktable-1.6.x" branch is
just over a year ago, Oct 21, 2015.
> * Are there any known 1.x securit
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:02:04 +0200
Germano Massullo wrote:
> The following message concerns darktable major update 2.x (actually on
> EPEL7 = 1.6.x)
> My interpretation of EPEL packaging guidelines [1] is that the major
> update darktable 2.x should be pushed as a darktable2 package [2].
In some