On 8 June 2013 11:27, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> In terms of the goal of collecting data to help EPEL, I presume anything
> we did with analysis would want to include making available the analyzed
> dataset. Is that possible to do while protecting privacy?
>
>
That is the rub. Once you go to
On 06/08/2013 09:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 19:21, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
>>
>> A tracking-mirror could go something like this:
>>
>> * Logs are rotated out to the trash regularly, e.g. 24 hours.[1]
>> * Data is gathered from logs in real time in an anonymous fashi
On 7 June 2013 19:21, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> A tracking-mirror could go something like this:
>
> * Logs are rotated out to the trash regularly, e.g. 24 hours.[1]
> * Data is gathered from logs in real time in an anonymous fashion, so
> nothing non-anonymous is inserted in to the database
On 06/07/2013 05:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 13:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>> The easiest way I could see is just get a better sampling method which
>>> would be to have funding for a mirror which w
On 7 June 2013 13:48, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The easiest way I could see is just get a better sampling method which
> > would be to have funding for a mirror which we then put into
> mirror-manager
> > and we know that thi
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:31:36PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The easiest way I could see is just get a better sampling method which
> would be to have funding for a mirror which we then put into mirror-manager
> and we know that this is a sampling versus a request info. (basically we
> w
On 7 June 2013 10:48, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
>
> Just to continue down this path for a moment, what are the ways we can
> track or get ideas of what is important to EPEL users? If we could
> improve what we have already, how would we do so? (Let's pretend for a
> moment that we can get a d
On 06/07/2013 09:19 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 05:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/06/2013 10:21 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> Hey, just a heads up
>>>
>>> the package Django has been deprecated or EPEL5 and EPEL6
On 7 June 2013 05:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/06/2013 10:21 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > Hey, just a heads up
> >
> > the package Django has been deprecated or EPEL5 and EPEL6. On
> > EPEL6, you can use Django14 as well, if you don't r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2013 10:21 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey, just a heads up
>
> the package Django has been deprecated or EPEL5 and EPEL6. On
> EPEL6, you can use Django14 as well, if you don't require Django
> in version 1.3. Please note, the latter does no
Hey, just a heads up
the package Django has been deprecated or EPEL5 and EPEL6.
On EPEL6, you can use Django14 as well, if you don't require Django in
version 1.3. Please note, the latter does not receive security updates
any more and contains at least one known weakness.
For EL5 it's not that si
11 matches
Mail list logo
