RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-06-01 Thread William Lefkovics
I had a similar experience with Compaq. Made my company a Compaq-free zone at the time. It's amazing how future purchases are based on experiences like that. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Friday, May 31

Re: Urgent: Public Folders Replication

2002-06-01 Thread Tony Hlabse
When did it start failing. Is this a new server you added. What is the schedule set for. Check Public affinity setup. - Original Message - From: Cedric To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:57 PM Subject: Urgent: Public Folders Replication

Re: Outlook for Mac

2002-06-01 Thread Tony Hlabse
Did you check WINS? -- Original Message - From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:30 PM Subject: Outlook for Mac > Hi all. > > I have a couple of customers who cannot connect to our Exchange 2000 > servers

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-06-01 Thread William Lefkovics
Um... IBM and Pink [1]? [1] As in pink slips [2][4] [2] Not to be confused with pink dress [3] [3] Hi Chris! [5] [4] 8 or 9 thousand or so [5] As in Scharff [6] [6] http://www.mail-resources.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger S

Urgent: Public Folders Replication

2002-06-01 Thread Cedric
I have an Urgent folder problem. I am trying to replicate public folders from one server to another. When I look in the system manger at the public folder properties, the original server replication status shows ‘In Sync’, but the new server shows ‘Local Modified’.  What is wrong? Also anyo

Outlook for Mac

2002-06-01 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Hi all. I have a couple of customers who cannot connect to our Exchange 2000 servers with Outlook for Mac (versions 8.2 and 2001) They have set up their HOSTS file correctly. They can ping the Exchange server. When they launch Outlook, it seems to find the server as it prompts them to enter th

RE: Stand-by servers

2002-06-01 Thread Ed Crowley
I think you should build these servers with new names and create new X.400 connectors to each of the hub sites but with higher costs than the X.400 connectors to the primary hub site. Leave them online all the time. Then if the primary hub site goes away, Exchange will automatically reroute via

RE: Exchange server question

2002-06-01 Thread Ed Crowley
When you delete a user mailbox in Exchange 5.5, incoming mail is bounced unless you attach the address to some other object. The administrator gets a copy of non-delivery reprots (NDRs) as proscribed by the settings in your IMS properties pages. If you want all messages to disappear into a vacuu

RE: Bad amil folder management

2002-06-01 Thread David Lemson
The only messages that end up in the badmail folder should be NDRs that are in response to NDRs. Because an NDR has no return address (on purpose), when you can't deliver an NDR, you have to do something special. Exchange 2000 puts such messages in the badmail directory. I can't recommend pu

RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org

2002-06-01 Thread David Lemson
You might find some info linked from http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/compare/default.asp to be interesting or useful to you. David -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions All, Our corp

Re: Veritas Storage Replicator and Exchange 5.5

2002-06-01 Thread missy koslosky
Actually, Paul Robichaux told me that. And I trust Paul. - Original Message - From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: RE: Veritas Storage Replicator and Exchange 5.5 At least that's what the sa

RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org

2002-06-01 Thread Andy David
lol. And then ordered all the software from his seat on the plane phone! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org It is unlikely that the IT Dir

RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org

2002-06-01 Thread Ed Crowley
It is unlikely that the IT Director got this idea from PC Magazine. More like it came from an in-flight magazine. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Veritas Storage Replicator and Exchange 5.5

2002-06-01 Thread Ed Crowley
At least that's what the salespeople say. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 6:00

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-06-01 Thread Ed Crowley
Another search found a hit that indicates that it's RAID5 with a hot spare. Well, my employer's had that for years. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-06-01 Thread missy koslosky
Ugh, but nicer. :) - Original Message - From: "Felicity Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server All right what does argle mean? --Felicity > Argle. > - Original