Search TechNet for "ResolveP2". By the way, most people like it the way
you see it because it's harder for someone from the Internet to
impersonate one of your internal users.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMA
Increase mailbox quotas.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows & Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Orlowski
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2
Hello all
Recently I notice my Exchange servers are not resolving smtp addresses
to display name when it receive mail from Internet. This happened after
I replaced the old IMC server with a newer server and a different OS,
but the IMC configuration is exactly the same.
Old IMC server: Winnt 4.0 w
www.mail-resources.com web links | server | archival
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Email Archival tools
>
>
> I have a user asking me if there is a group archival t
I have a user asking me if there is a group archival tool that they can use
to help store thier departments old emails. Basically what they do now is
each of them have a PST that they archive emails too. This means lots of
large PST files full of dublicate messages. They are looking for a way t
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 2:19pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for
> the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable
> space and using the OS to partition it? Is there a preference?
Myself, I would make t
I hear conflicting information from Dell support on how to configure
logical drives. Like to hear from fields...
Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for
the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable
space and using the OS to partition i
That doesn't seem to work either. According to Q253828, the Recipient Update Service
uses the msExchHideFromAddressLists attribute to build address lists and if this is
set to "TRUE", then it's not in an address book and then it can't be resolved. Ah
well, I may just have to accept defeat on
So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a hidd
Now if only it could be used as anti-virus software.
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Hi there
Just as a side note, if
Not aware of any limit or recommendation for one.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:39 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
>
>
> On an Exchange 5.5 s
You're a better man than I am. After three days, being on almost every
blacklist out there, and then finally cornering NAI, I found out that
Webshield will successfully relay.
Boy, was I annoyed!!
HTH
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Yea it can. I almost got caught in that once.
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Hi there
Just as a side note, if you're
Hi there
Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be
used as a relay. Just an FYI
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Am I still a relay?
This is completely UN-automated. I manually get the foreign addresses by
having a logon onto the parent company exchange network and using a
shareware thing called "GAL-Exporter" (I think it was about $40). GAL
exporter can either export individual containers (of which there are way too
many to
There is a relaying technique that Exchange appears to be vulnerable to in all the
open relay tests, even after you've put in all the recommended settings, but when you
actually try to exploit the apparent vulnerability, the message isn't relayed and an
NDR is generated. I'm guessing this is an
Is it named correctly?
-Original Message-
From: Topayung, Amdys Max [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help pls, exchange Virtual Directory
Hi guys !
By default, Excahnge 2000 will generate virtual directory for
use
Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS
articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one
point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying.
As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I
Oh, that was a random Usenet poster telling another random Usenet poster that
they should modify Mailbox permissions from the folders under the M:\ drive.
They needed calendar permissions changed, so I assumed (very wrongly) that it
could work also for the inbox permissions. However, because of
www.spellchecker.com I believe that is the link. Also www.messageware.com
has a product.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spell check in OWA
Is there a way to do a spell c
What? Do it in AD. Besides what does right clicking on Calendar have to do
with Mailbox access?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
Hi,
I
On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can
be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a
single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company
in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seem
NetIQ has a product that will monitor Public Folder usage. AppAnalyzer.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Organizing Public Folders
Kelley, Jason said :
>> We are planning t
third party...here is one..
http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/default.asp?page=OWA_Corp.htm
Dave Stevens
IT Network Support- Mail Administrator
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
865-576-8898
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September
Sorry.. Exchange 2000 SP3 / Windows 2000 SP3
Thanks,
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Spell check in OWA
yes
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+W
yes
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spell check in OWA
Is there a way
Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA?
Thanks
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubsc
NEVER TOUCH the M: drive..
Support.micrisoft.com search for see all mailboxes.
Pretty simple to find
Admin Rights to mail boxes
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q184573
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262054
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyo
Hi,
If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one
of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members
of some distribution lists I setup.
But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ -> DOMAIN -> MBX -> UserName ->
Inbox has the group
I didn't see you get any replies. Let me add a couple things, but I can't
claim to have THE answer.
First, I suspect that your address resolution description is not quite
right. Client user interface do frequently display extraneous characters as
though the MTA was trying to parse them in error
what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges
you can open anyone mailbox. A
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes
Hallo,
I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes.
In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which
states:
"Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the
mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto
secu
I did all of that
And still had problems
I also e-mailed the list admin
Apparently it has been fixed
Again I apologize for the overload of e-mails
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Rather than continue to send test messages to the list check your list
prefs.
When was the last time you reviewd your settings.
If infact your settings are cowrrect perhaps an unsub / resub would work.
--steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
No
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Are you using Proxy?
-Original Message-
From: Greg
Yet again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Test- is this getting through
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Received again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test
Test
Please reply if this anyone sees this
___
Loud and clear.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 15:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Test - is this getting through yet
Rob Weatherly
Handlem
Test received.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Test message
Please respond to confirm I
You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a hidden user
during the profile set up. All other users resolve just fine.
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Ex
Are you using Proxy?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
No
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: A
It came.. I saw.. I deleted it
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: test
Test
Please reply if this anyone sees this
___
Sorry every one I have been trying since last wed to post
I guess they are all getting through now
Again, I apologize
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Excha
No
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Do you have VPN?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory House
Do you have VPN?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they
authentica
This is from an external internet client
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Is this from internal or external
Yes, IE is being completely shut down. Even a reboot of the system has
the same issue. The only way to confuse the system is by going to a
different domain name and letting the other domain name timeout. We have
two internet domain names both pointing to the same place.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL
Oh,no, not another test!!!
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Test - is this getting through yet
Rob Weatherly
Handleman Compan
You made it, my posts are taking a long time to show up as well.
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Test message
Pleas
It is probably not Klez. Your sever is the one that sent the alert so it
couldn't have come from the outside. If it were a klez infection on your
internal network you would be seeing alot more of these from probably most
of your users.
Sounds more like a spammer or an open relay issue.
- Peter
Anyone ever been successful deploying E2k in a front end/back end scenario
with the front end box in a DMZ along with a hardware ssl accelerator?
Can't get OWA to work correctly. You get prompted for authentication
twice and then you can get into OWA, but Exchange automatically redirects
it to a
Test
Please reply if this anyone sees this
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E
Test- is this getting through
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Yup!
-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September
Hi guys !
By default, Excahnge 2000 will generate virtual directory for use with OWA.
But by accident we deleted it (the virtual directory)
When i try to build it again, it doesn't work. My OWA has passed away,
the only things that my browser show is directory browse.
Am i miss something ?
Is this from internal or external
Rob Weatherly
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 x122
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Sub
Perhaps a virus with a fake from address sent to someone else in your organization.
This happens with Klez, even though I don't think that is a Klez subject line.
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:11 PM
To: Exchange
Test - is this getting through yet
Rob Weatherly
Handleman Company
(248) 362-4400 x122
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
Test message
Please respond to confirm I am successfully sending messages
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
I
Is the person actually closing out IE after they logoff of OWA? OWA doesn't remove
the login by default until you start another IE session.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm trying to reso
You can find LegacyExchangeDN using the ADSI Edit from Windows 2000 Support Tools.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, P
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible
You could try out a third party product - SecureLogoff for OWA
http://www.messageware.net
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
We have tried both. St
Give them a bogus name until you can switch it, like Temp1, Temp2.
Just an idea.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Not really an option for 300 users an
We have tried both. Standard practice is to click the logoff button to
logout. Even that doesn't work on their system. We all know how hard
it is to get users not to just X out of everything though. I have
personally tried it with the logout and it doesn't work. Even a reboot
doesn't clear th
Not really an option for 300 users and mandatory profiles. Thought about doing it
though.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Unhide the mailbox and th
The reason that they are complaining is because there are two email account being
accessed from the same PC through OWA.. Once one of them logs in the other one can't.
1. They are not part of the domain. They are just a PC on the internet access the
OWA.
2. The username they use to logi
Unhide the mailbox and then do it. Then hide it again.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens
If they aren't using integrated windows authentication, as their
authentication method then it would appear that IE is not being shut down
completely. Are the users choosing to log off of OWA when they exit or
simply closing the window?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Householder [ma
I guess, what probably happened then is that once upon a time, your
users checked the 'Save this password in your password list' and it
saved it
Delete any .PWL files you find.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 September 2002 4:22 PM
To
Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past
we would put the Distinguished Name in the "Mailbox:" box in setting up the profile.
Then by clicking "Check Name", the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that
doesn't work and I was wondering if a
1> Are they running Windows NT/2000/XP or 9x/Me as part of the domain?
2> Are they part of the same Win2K domain/forest as the Exch 2k server?
or
Are their login credentials (login pass) with which they log in to the PC the same
as their Exch 2k login/pass?
3> do they access the
It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we
have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for
each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange
. I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them
are having
You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie
comes up with who it is for?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Monday, Septe
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in
the GAL. So far, I've only found articles
How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that
they get in just fine. Color me confused.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 ru
Danke schoen! Er.. Thank you.
AW
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> Q188856 describes your situation.
>
> Q197180 has a list of all the command line switches.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> jeff e.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in
the GAL. So far, I've only found articles
Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they
authenticate is when they log into their email.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM
To:
We're running Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4, in case that matters. I'm starting our
Exchange 2000 migration next week. Clients are various versions of Outlook,
from 97 through 2002.
I've got one user (a VP/lawyer) who uses a Palm device (model unknown at
this time) and the Palm.net wireless service to send
'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows
authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain
first?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM
To:
And they're complaining? Bloody users, they're never happy :-)
The 'problem' might be because they're accessing OWA using
http://[SERVERNAME]/exchange (NTLM) instead of http://server.domain.com/exchnage (by
FQDN) or http://1.2.3.4/exchange (by IP), this causes IE to authenticate using t
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are
having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask
them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They
are running IE 6
I'm going!
:)
Thanks,
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: "Luck, Sönke" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC
It will be my first MEC in the US!
Sönke Luck
KPMG Germany
Exchange Messaging
-Original Message-
F
Allison,
Looks like you have it the other way round then he uses an English client
(IE you should use the same exmerge client as the user, in this case
English) and that's why you can't delete the English but you can delete the
German version.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
every
Q188856 describes your situation.
Q197180 has a list of all the command line switches.
Hope this helps.
jeff e.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Doubles of all Outlook
Hallo Paul,
The 2 machines that I used Exmerge on were both German. It was the Outlook
client that was in English -- I just wanted to open his mailbox to verify that
#1 he could login and #2 his data was there.
Allison
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> Allison,
>
> When Exmerging you should
Hallo Paul,
When the user right-clicks on the English (the newly created ones) folders,
there is no option to delete. However he has the option to delete the (old)
German ones...
AW
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote:
> P.S. the calendars that has been newly created is NOT the same as the
> origin
P.S. the calendars that has been newly created is NOT the same as the
original one in Outlook (you will be able to delete the new one whilst in
Outlook you will NOT be able to delete the German one)
, so I would keep his German Calendar/tasks and journal folders as these
have 'special' connection
Allison,
When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that
language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
S
These are not from NetIQ, but Exchange 2000 internally. TO configure
these thresholds, you need to open the Exchange System Manager, then
expand Tools and then Monitoring and Status. Here you will see 2
folders. One for notification and one for status. Status is used for
setting up these threshold
Hello,
So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the
new server. Worked fine. Except...
I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that
everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed
to set a registery key
It will be my first MEC in the US!
Sönke Luck
KPMG Germany
Exchange Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackston
93 matches
Mail list logo
