I think you should plan on having a clone root domain controller. You could
use VMWare or Microsoft Virtual Server and run it on the same box, though.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [
Yes. It's really only important to block logins to the Exchange 5.5 server.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;218920
What's not in the KB is that the Exchange 2000 server whose System Attendant
and DSA you must allow is the server on which the Site Replication Service
runs.
Exchange 2000 does not have an "Exchange Administrator" account. What
Exchange rights and at what levels does the account have?
Is the account a member of Enterprise Admins and Schema Admins?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Bac
The error you are seeing usually indicates a permissions problem.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M
Sent: Friday, January 09, 20
Hello,
Bug / Setup quirk:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/support/e2k3owa.asp
(posted earlier to this list by David Lemson, 11/27/03)
Brent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:31 P
That's a great question. I don't know the answer, though. It'd be nice to
hear what happens - please report back when you complete your testing!
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1
DeEnd of this thread
> -Original Message-
> From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: unhold
>
>
> decompose
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Frida
decompose
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
Defile
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wilkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:00 PM
To: Exchang
Defile
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wilkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DeFrag
-Original Message-
From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:59 PM
To: Exchange
DeFrag
-Original Message-
From: Glaman, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DeCrypt
-Original Message-
From: Marty Gavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Exchange
DeCrypt
-Original Message-
From: Marty Gavin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DeRail
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:07 PM
To: Exc
DeRail
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DePlane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Friday, Ja
DePlane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DePlane
From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECT
DePlane
From: Martin Blackstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: unhold
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:01 -0800
DeFlowers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
DeFlowers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DePants
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
DePants
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: unhold
DeThong
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Januar
DeThong
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: unhold
Unhold
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_fa
Unhold
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchang
Must be nice to have that kind of hardware budget!
I think you'll be fine going that way.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL
You have valid Domain controller inplace at your test site or are you
testing that part also. MS has a rather lenghty indepth white paper that
spells out all of the steps and requirements.
From: "Miller, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchan
We are doing Boot-to-SAN on about 30 production servers right now without a
single problem or performance glitch. The idea spooked me also, but we
extensively test and load simulated the setup in the lab and it proved to be
very solid. We even have 2 production SQL servers running b00t-to-SAN and
t
Boot-from-SAN thingie kind of spooked me, but maybe because I have never been in an
environment that used it.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Location of Transaction Logs
Yo,
I think I have figured it out. Finally it dawned on me to look at the
IIS logs on the user's home Exchange server.
This is what I saw:
2004-01-09 15:53:10 10.7.0.13 na/selwapa 10.67.46.28 80 GET /exchange -
302
Exchange-Server-Frontend-Proxy/6.0+Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Wi
ndows+NT+5.1
WaaSp Roger,
Good to hear from you. That is exactly what were considering 1 cold standby
instead of clustering. All we would have to do is change the World Wide Name
of our HBA fiber card in the SAN switch and were back up and running. Thanks
for the info I will follow up with that, and will
Yo, Tony! I see you survived the trip back from Orlando...
If I remember correctly, you can bypass caching at the RAID group (not the
LUN) level through Navisphere. I don't currently have access to mine to
check, but I know I asked that question.
Another option is to change the read/write cache
All,
We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no
connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an
empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where
all objects live). The Exchange ser
Yes we do, our whole data center runs from a room full of batteries which
are powered by 2 big diesel generators. SO losing power is the least of our
worries. We just want to assure that if the server fails, that the latest
transactions logs are still going to be intact on the SANS disk and/or cach
If the CX600 is like the FC4700, then you have two fairly large batteries that sit
just below the controller for the SAN that powers the RAM used for the cache... if the
SAN looses power, the batteries provide power to the cache to hold that information...
of course you should have the SAN runni
Hello all,
We are planning a global Exchange upgrade here to 2003 and are
researching an issue that an email admin here is having with the location of
the Transaction logs in our new Exchange Architecture. We are planning to
Deploy Quad-proc servers that are boot-to-SAN o
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;146764
-Original Message-
From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disabling Outlook access to Exchange 5.5
Is there a way to block Outlook users
Is there a way to block Outlook users from connecting to an Exchange 5.5
server? We are moving users from one server to another and want to block
them from logging into their mailbox on the weekend.
Ralph Elmerick
NT & Exchange Administrator
Information Systems Technical Principal
*
Is there a way to block Outlook users from connecting to an Exchange server?
We are moving users from one server to another and want to block them from
logging into their mailbox on the weekend.
Ralph Elmerick
NT & Exchange Administrator
Information Systems Technical Principal
**
Hello,
I have an Exchange 2000 Server/sp2. On this machine Windows 2000 is at
sp4 and is a DC in the domain. I am using the "administrator" account,
which is also the Exchange Administrator, to apply the sp.
When trying to apply Exchange 2000 sp3 I am receiving the following
error.
The component
That's why E2003 handles them so well.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
Err, Outlook 2003 has the ability to handle PST files in excess of 2Gb.
Exchange
Err, Outlook 2003 has the ability to handle PST files in excess of 2Gb.
Exchange itself doesn't know or care about PST files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald
Mazzotta
Sent: 09 January 2004 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
You should be able to backup a pst after (30) minutes of inactivity.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;222328
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003
Exchange 2003 pst files larger than 2gig are possible I believe.
Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky & Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent
Look on Sue Mosher's Slipstick site for Ffolder Utility:
Ffolder Utility: Utility to rename or delete "special"
Outlook folders such as the Calendar, Tasks, Inbox, and Contacts. VB
source code included.
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/gallery/index.htm#ffolder
You could perhaps copy all data from
I have a PST larger than 2GB FWIW. Seems to work fine.
Yes, I'm mostly just being difficult.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:47 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups
That's one of the reasons the FAQ recommends subscribing a public
folder...
PIMPCBO
-Original Message-
From: Reasoner, Bob (PHES) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:54 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: doubletake
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want
Matthew, you will find that the PST=BAD has become religious dogma on
this list. In reality, PST files are just another tool, and much like
any other tool (inclined plane, fire, chainsaw, etc) they are neither
inherently good nor evil.
On the other hand, while PST files can serve a useful purpose,
We are in the process of replacing one of our Exchange servers and the new
server's Exchange Event service will not start. The following appears in
the application log whenever an attempt is made to start the service:
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeES
Event Category: Genera
Route it to an iMail server that has a "Nobody" alias (catch-all alias)
Well, you would have to buy iMail for that. But there are some similar
e-mail server programs out there that are free that allow Nobody
aliases. For example MailEnable (although it is a POS).
Oh, Mercury Pegasus Mail comes to
Yes, and all their names as well!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
Do you want to see pictures of my 257 cats?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Ph
That's probably the best way to do it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:59
Kinda like his dad, eh?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
> To: Exc
He's still suffering from culture shock.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3
There are unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of the list.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Reasoner, Bob (PHES)
> Sent: 08 January 2004 22:54
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: doubletake
>
> While I don't want to soun
48 matches
Mail list logo
