Roaming Outlook XP users, but with no Roaming Profiles

Is there any way of having a roaming outlook profile that follows a user, but without actually having a roaming w2k profile? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http:

RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025

Mine asked for a reboot. -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 May 2002 14:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 It wasn't required for my server, but I did it just in case. Chu

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA with multiple domains

See Q293386 -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 May 2002 21:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA with multiple domains HQ does not have a good record when it comes to W2K and E2K so I don't trust them. I'm trying to minimize exposure to the

RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K - The fix

For info See Q289869 on the FTP view problem and Q293386 just about covers the second issue. -Original Message- From: Lantzos Antony Sent: 21 May 2002 08:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds with

RE: OWA - FTP Type response. - E2K

Only server. It has never worked, always behaved like this. -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 10:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K Was it working before you applied E2K sp2 ? Is this the only server

RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K

I have many times. -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 10:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K Re-boot the server Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR

OWA - FTP Type repsonse. - E2K

I have an upgraded 5.5 server now on E2K sp2 which responds with FTP type browsing when accessing the OWA. I'm not getting any errors. I had to follow a few Q's as the exchfilt.dll did not swap to the new version on upgrade, not sure if this is related. Also the /exadmin virtual was missing. I

RE: ADC - Config Entry

Yes, I followed a few Q's, it wanted me to change the LDAP ports on my existing 5.5 servers. I changed them to 379. It let me create the SRS. Replication has started and some tanked up mail has now been delivered from 5.5 to 2000. The E2K servers are now showing up in the 5.5 Admin tools on th

RE: ADC - Config Entry

Yes, sounds like it. It assumed a new site and did not ask me. If I try and create a new SRS, it only lists my 5.5 servers. When I choose a 5.5 server and authenticate it says the server is not available. How do I get my Config_CA back post 2000 installation? It does not matter if I must re-

RE: ADC - Config Entry

Yes, first time. I ended up having to un-install exchange 2000, then re-install at a later date. It did not ask me a second time when I re-installed, not that I undid the forest prep & domain prep, I just un-installed E2K. It only asked me at forest prep time originally. -Original Message-

RE: ADC - Config Entry

I suppose a tell tale problem is that if I go into my 5.5 administrator progs on a 5.5 server, expand the servers tree, the 2 newly added E2K servers are not listed. What went wrong? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 13:57 To: Exchange D

RE: ADC - Config Entry

Ok, the Config_CA is not there anymore, just my connection agreements, AD is replicating ok. Can send messages between Ex2k servers in site, but not to 5.5 servers in site. The GAL is populated with my 5.5 & AD info but mail not passing between 5.5 & E2K in the same site. -Original Messag

ADC - Config Entry

When installing into a 5.5 site, should the ADC show an automatically generated config connection from the install? Many Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://w

RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k

Is there anyway of undoing what Forestprep & domainprep do to AD? i.e. start again? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k What would the fun be in that.. I was t

Removing Exchange 2000

Can you point me in the right direction for documentation / tips on removing Exchange 2000 from a domain/forest and AD schema. Many Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

Mail Queued at MTA

All Nt4 SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4. Ive got a stack of SMTP email stuck at the MTA in Server A, destination Server B. Server B is down. Server B had the only IMC in the Org. Made another IMC on Server A, all new incoming/outgoing smtp email now flowing ok. Is there anyway of lifting the smtp ema

RE: Exch2000 d-queue from 5.5 with ETRN

Get 550 relaying not allowed. Why? -Original Message- From: Lantzos Antony Sent: 05 February 2002 10:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch2000 d-queue from 5.5 with ETRN Sensitivity: Confidential Thanks Andy, I don't seem to be getting my head around this The FQDN is peter

RE: Exch2000 d-queue from 5.5 with ETRN

Thanks Andy, I don't seem to be getting my head around this The FQDN is peteralan.co.uk, at the mo, all mail is accepted as inbound on the IMC. All users have a mailbox, they access it using Outlook on a LAN POP3 over the Internet. Some of the users are now at a fixed new site and they have

Exch2000 d-queue from 5.5 with ETRN

Scenario... I have an NT4sp6a Exc 5.5sp4 site with a FQDN and fixed IP address. I have some pop3 mailboxes that collect their mail from this Server using the said FQDN. I have a W2k Exc 2000 site at a different location, its dial up with an ISDN TA. It gets a different IP each time when co

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

All servers are 5.5 SP3. Half of them still on NT 4 SP6a, one is on W2K SP2 I Installed the ADC first. But did not establish a Recipient Connection, as it would not take it as below, So I went ahead and installed E2K, and joined the existing 5.5 site. All this seems ok. It will send to anothe

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

On a PDC (as it were) the Exchange Setup prog does the Domain & Forrest prep for you as it was the highest point anyway in the forest. This went ok, I cant get the recipient ADC to work, it keeps saying that the 5.5 exchange server specified in the From exchange setting is invalid, but its not.

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

Any news on this? -Original Message- From: Lantzos Antony Sent: 28 November 2001 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential Does the Recipient ADC need to be in place before Installing Exchange or can it be added after? ---

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

Does the Recipient ADC need to be in place before Installing Exchange or can it be added after? -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

Yes, I ran this first. It shows up in the ADC MMC and a connection agreement cert for the said server. The AD master (PDC) is the same machine. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K wont re

E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

Ive added an E2K server to my 5.5 SP4 site, all seemed ok, no install errors, E2K has SP1 & Q303451. I can send an email from a mailbox created on the E2K server to a mailbox on the 5.5 servers and also to the internet via the IMC on one of the 5.5 servers. If I send an email to the E2K mailbox

RE: Can I not do this?

I upgraded NT to 2000, the DCpromo ran shortly after. It ran ok, and the domain functions in mixed mode with all groups & users retained. The upgrade installed the DNS service & configured it for me. The Windows 2000 was an upgrade, so was the Exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: K

Can I not do this?

I've got a PDC (Its the only server in the domain), Its got Exchange 5.5 on it. I'm doing the following; Upgrading it to 2000 ADV Server, create a new AD forest and leave it in mixed mode. Works fine, Exchange 5.5 happy, whole server happy. I run Exchange 2000 setup, run the ADC thingy - Fine.

Upgrading from 5.5 to 2000 - Error

Whilst half way through an upgrade to 2000, I get the following error, which only gives a Retry or Cancel option. "Set-up failed while installing subcomponent MS SchedulePlus Free/Busy connector with error code 0x80072030" Has anyone seen this before or got a fix for it? _

RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2K upgrade

I did not follow the Q properly... It worked, thanks -Original Message- From: Lantzos Antony Sent: 04 October 2001 14:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2K upgrade Thanks for that, the Q does not fic the problem though The error is The Component "Micr

RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2K upgrade

Thanks for that, the Q does not fic the problem though The error is The Component "Microsoft Exchange Messaging & Collaboration Service" cannot install because the directory service is not the expected type. Ive changed the LDAP port in Exchange 5.5 it was the same -Original Mess

Exchange 5.5 to 2K upgrade

I'm trying to upgrade my 5.5 site to 2000, but get an error. The server was a PDC NT4 and was the only server in this Domain. The server was upgraded to Windows 2K ADV and Active Directory. (Mixed Mode) All went ok. The 5.5 SP4, single site/server Exchange installation on it, also functions ok.