RE: Exchange DB defrag

2003-12-17 Thread Schaible, Doug
I've done it on a much smaller DB but it took FOREVER. Save yourself a lot of time and grief, get 120GB disk and install it in your server. -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch

Exchange Limits

2003-11-03 Thread Doug Schaible
Exchange 2000 SP3 Any suggestions on setting size limits on both the SMTP virtual server and on idividual mailboxes? I had originally set a 4mb limit on the SMTP and 200mb limit mailboxes, which no one complained about for 4 years. Some "select" staff complained and corporate had me remove both

Re: ??? on outlook folders

2003-10-01 Thread Doug Schaible
Its a language pack issue. I support both english and japanese users and I see this whenever I open a japanese user's mailbox on a machine that doesn't have the east asian character sets. Make sure you have the correct locales loading in Exchange and that each client has the appropriate language

Exchange2000 permissions

2003-07-24 Thread Doug
We have just discovered that any user can open any other users mailbox. I have been trying to find a list of what the default permissions should be with no luck. Domain Users has all but full control at the top level of the mailbox store which I am guessing is bad. I am a little reluctant to be mes

Exchange 2k & Domain Controllers

2003-07-15 Thread Doug Schaible
I have an Exchange 2000 Server that also happens to be a domain controller. At one time this was required because this site only had two servers and we needed a backup domain controller. Now the site has additional servers and there's no need for Exchange to sit on domain controller, besides thi

Rule gone amuck

2003-03-14 Thread Doug Kassay
I have a rule in outlook that constantly comes up with the following error. I had a rule called '[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> delete' but it was a bit to aggressive so I deleted it about a week ago. Now I am coming up with the following error: Rule "XXX delete" can not move mail to the "Inbound_Trash" f

RE: NAV and Exchange

2003-02-21 Thread Doug Kassay
I read through the article but it does not mention the exchsrvr\imcdata directory. Is it alright to run file based scanning against this directory? Thanks. Doug -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange

RE: Titanium OWA screenshots

2003-01-22 Thread Doug Kassay
Thanks, That really illustrates the differences. I think we will OWA2003 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651

RE: Titanium OWA screenshots

2003-01-21 Thread Doug Kassay
better version I am not > finding it radically different from 2000. > > -Original Message- > From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots > > > As

RE: Titanium OWA screenshots

2003-01-21 Thread Doug Kassay
but was very impressed with how awesome I found the titanium demo that Andrey hosted. (Thanks Andrey) Basically my question is: Is Titanium worth jumping from 5.5 and bypassing our plans for 2000? The follow up question is, which is mainly for Andrey: What is the OS that the demo is running on? D

RE: (Very) Delayed delivery

2003-01-17 Thread Doug Kassay
freeware product called ethereal (www.ethereal.com) to help me solve quite a few problems of this nature. Good luck Doug -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (Very) Delayed delivery

Upgrade Question

2003-01-06 Thread Doug Kassay
We are currently running 5.5 enterprise and are in the process of getting a new main server for an other business application. This is currently the server that runs Exchange on NT 4 sp6. We will obviously be getting the new server with 2000 server. The question has come up regarding upgrading t

RE: Upgrade Question

2003-01-06 Thread Doug Kassay
quid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Question Yes, there is. And I have read quite a bit of

RE: Upgrade Question

2003-01-06 Thread Doug Kassay
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade Question Plenty of articles and how to's on MS site with regard from upgrading from NT4.0/Exchange5.5 to Win2K/E2K - Original Message - From: "Doug Kassay" <[EM

RE: E-mail in to China

2002-12-20 Thread Doug Kassay
view the TCP transaction between or exchange server and the others ISP's mail server. I was able to read the rejection message from there server. This is a freeware, but amongst the nicest piece of freeware I have used. Doug -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[

Odd message from other mail server

2002-12-11 Thread Doug Kassay
o to trouble shoot, or even what question(s) to ask in this list. Has anyone got any insight, former experience, suggestions or smart ass comments? At this point anything would be helpful. Doug _ List posting FAQ: http://w

RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers

2002-12-09 Thread Doug Kassay
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not send me a notification of inbound failure. Thanks. Doug -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers I've found some

RE: Stuck emails

2002-11-21 Thread Doug Kassay
Never mind, I fixed it. Somehow the MTA service was not turned on. DUH, just goes to show you: Check the easy stuff first. ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug

Stuck emails

2002-11-21 Thread Doug Kassay
~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List postin

Re: RBL's

2002-11-07 Thread Doug Hampshire
Don't need to, it already works well here ;-) - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Exchange Discussions'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: RBL's > Lets talk about something else like making it illegal to smoke

RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions

2002-10-18 Thread Doug Kassay
Even if you found a vendor/product that could accomplish that task, why would you want to send out an attachment that 95% of other systems would just block anyway. Doug -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott@;SND.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:09 PM To: Exchange

RE: SMTP to aol.com

2002-10-03 Thread Doug Kassay
I finally can answer a question on this list :) AOL sucks! Seriously, the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be that were an open relay. Doug Kassay -Original Message- From: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange

RE: using mailserver from another domain

2002-09-27 Thread Doug Kassay
Just allow for relaying from domB by IP address [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: using mailserver from another domain I have 2 w2k domains. 1 (domA) has a Xch mai

Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)

2002-09-23 Thread Doug Kassay
d really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist

RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)

2002-06-04 Thread Doug Hampshire
ns Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) Why are giving her such a hard time? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging & collabora

RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging)

2002-06-04 Thread Doug Hampshire
I just heard back from one of my contacts at the and they said you were a Troll. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging & collaboration (Unified Messaging) I just heard bac

RE: Where is everyone?

2002-06-04 Thread Doug Hampshire
We don't invite Trolls that hide behind false eMail accounts and that only post via the Web interface. Too bad because we had lots of adult beverages. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: help

2002-05-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
In that case, I'm not wearing pants. Just wanted to let you know. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help I just wanted to let you know... -Original Message- From: Chris

RE: help

2002-05-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
When you do that voodoo, that you do so well. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help So what? Care to be a LITTLE bit more specific in your request? Or should we resort to the

RE: For those fed up with the looping stuff

2002-05-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
Trust me. No one covets this list. We endure it. -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: For those fed up with the looping stuff Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's list... ;-}

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Yes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Discussions > Subject: RE: Archive > > > That's as bad as taking technology advice from marketing. > > Serdar Soysal > > > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:07 PM > To: Exchange

RE: Test

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test But we like Martin and Andy. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
What does your Legal department say? Or do they take the lead from IT? [1] [1] Note to self: quickly run away from any company that takes legal advice from IT. -Original Message- From: Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Archive

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
They should buy Soap on a Rope? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archive You know what they say about those who act as their own attorney! Ed Crowley hp Services --- David Florea

RE: Moving Public Folders from E5.5

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Run into it many times (we like to acquire companies here). Multiple PST's is the only solution we have ever found. We even tasked our TAM with finding another solution. He came back with - multiple PST's. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Changing OWA Port

2002-05-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Making your own certificate is ugly. Not that the certificate is hard to create, but due to all the calls from your lusers that can't understand why their browser is asking them to install an untrusted certificate into their system. Anything that is labeled as "untrusted" sets off the panic alarm

Exchange 5.5 server won't go away

2002-05-20 Thread McCullar, Doug
I have removed a 5.5 server from my Ex2K environment. I did not do it the right way and it still shows up in my System Manager. I have search my TechNet to see how to clean it out to no avail. Can someone help? _ List posting FA

RE: test

2002-05-09 Thread Doug Hampshire
hange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 >SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue >0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: tes

RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley

2002-05-02 Thread Doug Hampshire
And TINSC[1]. Oh wait no he doesn't. Never mind, move along now. Nothing to see here. [1] There Is No Secret Cabal -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley And also

RE: Test to see if the list is live...

2002-05-01 Thread Doug Hampshire
Besides in Heaven we wouldn't keep getting these blue screens and having to load rollup patches. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test to see if the list is live... Wer hav

RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy

2002-05-01 Thread Doug Hampshire
Every person on this list has an eMail policy. The policy can range from "we don't enforce anything" to "Legal makes us be the eMail Gestapo and Thought Police". Even if you don't have a stated, written policy you still have a de facto policy in place then. My personal druthers? 200 MB mailbox li

RE: any news on sp3?

2002-04-30 Thread Doug Hampshire
We specialize in tasteless here ma'am. (but we're polite about it) Got any pictures to prove it? Please. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: any news on sp3? Wow. I really can

RE: Full access

2002-04-12 Thread Doug Hampshire
My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday,

RE: Full access

2002-04-11 Thread Doug Hampshire
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message >Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 >From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Full access >To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.

2002-04-11 Thread Doug Hampshire
il message. I'll use the same argument Doug used for the BCC question. How did you prevent someone from taking a typed memo and making photocopies of it? > -Original Message- > From: Bibel, Laura Y. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:08 PM >

RE: Full access

2002-04-11 Thread Doug Hampshire
But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C-level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would cons

RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server

2002-04-10 Thread Doug Hampshire
hange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server Those of us under 40 dont remember that. Original message >Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:07:48 -0700 >From: Doug Hampshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on e

RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server

2002-04-10 Thread Doug Hampshire
And how did they disable it prior to electronic eMail? After all the term BCC refers to Blind CARBON Copy, referring to the old practice of putting carbon paper under the original letter on their typewriter (or under the hand written note). -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMA

RE: Check it out

2002-04-04 Thread Doug Hampshire
Nope. No Workee. U bad Tener. ANDY! Aren't U his Tech Buddy. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Check it out Exchange 5.5 IMAP4 Easter Egg Rating: 5.3 of 10 (18 votes cast) Fr

RE: Comm Check

2002-03-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
Keep it on topic asshole [1] [1] I'm experimenting with being a newbie. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comm Check I'm also experimenting whether being a PITA is any better th

RE: Comm Check

2002-03-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
You know they added an option in the latest version of Outlook that will auto-majikly run spel chuck each time you press the SEND button. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comm Che

RE: Instant Messaging ???

2002-03-28 Thread McCullar, Doug
They definitely haven't answered yet. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Instant Messaging ??? Where are those smart people when we need them? --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC

RE: Dell Diags

2002-03-27 Thread Doug Hampshire
So call them from work when you need support on your home unit. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dell Diags (At work) their support for us is awsome! But at home that is a di

RE: deleting mail

2002-03-27 Thread Doug Hampshire
If the message that you boss/CEO/disgruntled employee sent out has a subject that is unique enough, exmerge will work just dandy. Actually exmerge will work no matter what the subject is, but it might delete more than you intended. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [

RE: protocol error

2002-03-27 Thread Doug Hampshire
It means you started eating your soup before the Prime Minister. Next time wait until he starts. Also don't tuck your napkin in your shirt, place it in your lap. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Prep

2002-03-26 Thread McCullar, Doug
This is sure a waste of everyone's bandwidth and time... -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep One should learn to play nice before one has to place foot in mouth... I love to pl

RE: Move Mailbox

2002-03-22 Thread McCullar, Doug
I do it all the time and it has no effect. They just cannot access it while you are moving it. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move Mailbox Does anyone know the impact of moving a

RE: Disaster Recovery Center

2002-03-21 Thread Doug Hampshire
I would avoid Arthur Anderson. -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disaster Recovery Center We're redoing our disaster recovery plan (finally!) and I have some questions. Does any

RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?

2002-03-20 Thread Doug Hampshire
Or translated from Tenorish to English: Phil, try reinstalling SP4. I believe that SP3 had a fix for this problem. [1] [1] The corrected English response does not in any way imply that Rich knows WTF he is talking about. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?

2002-03-20 Thread Doug Hampshire
What a Dick! [1] [1] Just quoting Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting requests do not work if they contain an attachment?

RE: Exchange 2000 in 5.5 Site

2002-03-13 Thread McCullar, Doug
fine. What is meant by users can't see others' schedules? Is there an error message or do you mean they open the schedule but it is blank when you know there should be info there? - Original Message - From: "McCullar, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange D

RE: Exchange 2000 in 5.5 Site

2002-03-13 Thread McCullar, Doug
es; follow the KB on removing the first server in the site 2. All attendees, some attendees, specific ones all the time, random? - Original Message - From: "McCullar, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, Ma

RE: Exchange 2000 in 5.5 Site

2002-03-12 Thread McCullar, Doug
that MS has a paper or two on exactly this procedure. You might check their website (which should have been your first option instead of this list). - Original Message - From: "McCullar, Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

Exchange 2000 in 5.5 Site

2002-03-12 Thread McCullar, Doug
I have joined a 5.5 site with an Exchange 2000 server. Everything seems to be working fine and I think I am close to removing the 5.5 server. Is there anything I need to do or maybe a white paper I can ready before I proceed? Also, my users are having problem with not being able to see the s

Exchange 2000 in 5.5 Site

2002-03-12 Thread McCullar, Doug
I have joined a 5.5 site with an Exchange 2000 server. Everything seems to be working fine and I think I am close to removing the 5.5 server. Is there anything I need to do or maybe a white paper I can ready before I proceed? Also, my users are having problem with not being able to see the s

Free-Busy Problem

2002-03-12 Thread McCullar, Doug
I have just joined an Exchange 5.5 site with a 2000 server and now my users cannot see other users schedules when scheduling meetings. The Free-Busy folder doesn't seem to be operational. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ:

RE: NDR ?

2002-03-06 Thread Doug Hampshire
I don't support mime's at all. Worse than an 8 bit mime is some 2 bit mime. I wish someone would lock all of them in their invisible box and throw away the key. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussion

RE: Account locked out

2002-03-04 Thread Doug Hampshire
Either someone else is trying to logon as that user. One common thing we have seen is that people will use their personal accounts for service accounts (these are developers, not IT). After they change the password, the service account will do something that requires authentication. -Original

owa stops intermittently

2002-02-18 Thread doug
exchange svr 5.5 sp 4, standalone owa on nt4 sp6 with iis 4. sometimes it takes a few days, sometimes a few minutes, but it invariably stops and needs to be restarted (the service.) any ideas on what to check for? thanks, doug

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Doug Eubank
Thanks Jim. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:25 PM To: Doug Eubank; 'Exchange Discussions ' Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Doug, Well...after looking at the Internet H

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Doug Eubank
What utility are you using to resolve the address and compare to Spam lists? > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? > >

RE: Radio Buttons

2002-02-01 Thread Doug Hampshire
Video killed the radio star. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Radio Buttons I am creating a form, and there are several different categories, that have their own radio buttons. B

RE: Purge folder

2002-02-01 Thread Doug Hampshire
Look for the eating disorders tab under properties for Outlook today. You have to enable the binge option first. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Purge folder Hello, I

RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
We block that site with WebSense. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's dsfijj? D;o[dyovl.com! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMA

RE: Outlook Rules Problem

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
Here's how we handle it: 1. Never allow auto replies to the Internet, you WILL get a mail loop. 2. Allow OOF to the Internet. In theory it can loop, but I have not been able to find someone that experienced one in the past couple of years. 3. We set the Alternate Recipient to a Dead Letter mailbox

RE: Outlook Rules Problem

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
That's just hurtful -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem Who cares what HR wants. They never care what we want! :) -Original Message- From:

RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
il and Compaq iPaq's Doug, I hate to argue with someone as knowledgeable as you are, but I am not getting the same options you are, evidently. I was doing exactly the steps you suggested, but don't have the ability to select individual folders underneath the Inbox. All I have are connect

RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
No he doesn't. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's Its ok to argue with Doug. I do it all the time. -Original Message- From: Blunt, Ja

RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
, January 31, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's Under what? :) -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's You ju

RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's

2002-01-31 Thread Doug Hampshire
You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the options? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail and

RE: SPAM Blocking List

2002-01-29 Thread Doug Hampshire
My anti-spam list (YMMV) - Yahoo.com Hotmail.com Donkey_on_a_waffle.com Zzzptm.com Of course my users don't like this list much. -Original Message- From: Hooks, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discus

RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????

2002-01-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
Exchange Administrator - a sign of a diseased mind. - Amit Hanji -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? Multipl

RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????

2002-01-28 Thread Doug Hampshire
#2 is the likely suspect. Just check your logs to see who is accessing the said users accounts. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this

RE: average lifespan server

2002-01-24 Thread Doug Hampshire
east I have something to say... K/ -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server Yes, but that person had no clue on real life in IT, and also reneged on that claim when I pr

RE: average lifespan server

2002-01-24 Thread Doug Hampshire
Yes, but that person had no clue on real life in IT, and also reneged on that claim when I pressed them to provide one example of a server they had that was that old still running in a production. The original question requires more parameters. Were they inquiring about the general life span of a

RE: RAM

2002-01-17 Thread Doug Eubank
That'll do pig. That'll do. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAM BAA RAM EWE BAA RAM EWE -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursd

RE: What would you buy?

2002-01-11 Thread Doug Hampshire
Acer baby. eMachines has some cool server stuff too. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What would you buy? Not nessicarily brand, cause I'm stuck with IBM. Exchange 2000 server for

RE: High Physical Memory Utilization

2002-01-11 Thread Doug Hampshire
A system that is good for 5-8 years? So you are currently running systems that were state of the art 5-8 years ago? Do you have Exchange running on a 486-DX2 with 128MB of RAM? BTW, from a financial standpoint any system that old is already fully depreciated. I suspect your support costs for cont

RE: OWA access to Small Business Server

2002-01-11 Thread Doug Eubank
Check out www.isaserver.org. It's a great site with lists, faq's, and tutorials. You should be able to find your answer there. I believe you will find an article on this subject in their Learning Zone. -Original Message- From: George Guzic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, Janua

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

2002-01-09 Thread Doug Hampshire
I hear that ya'll take the day off in Chicago when Drew starts counting from day zero. So 'bout every 2 years? -Original Message- From: K. Triona Guidry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list gre

RE: exchange server freezes

2002-01-09 Thread Doug Hampshire
Troubleshooting 101 - Change one item, evaluate outcome. If no workee, try next configuration change, evaluate outcome. Still no workee, spend much $ with consultant (Andy's in New York and works for cheese and beer). -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sen

RE: exchange server freezes

2002-01-09 Thread Doug Hampshire
Breaking the law, Breaking the law. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange server freezes Ju-das Priest -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-09 Thread Doug Hampshire
archive now, and thank Doug. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com "One man's ceiling is another m

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
e sunshine. If it wasn't all these pesky users our job would be much easier. :) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampshire [ma

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
Being that you are on Aloha Time Ben, no worries then. -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not) I had a user begin her call today with "You

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
Daniel, you can see many photos of Kelly on her Website. The link is in the archives. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: fix monitor Kelly barefoot... bellydance...

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
Where does the line form? Behind Andy I assume. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: fix monitor Roger: Has she flamencos danced on you with her high heels? John Mattes

RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
makes this list great (Not) Although his title makes my job a lot harder. I need to include graphs in all my communication with him. My Workload: Doug's Workload:* Can I take that * off your plate, Do

RE: Blocking spam

2002-01-08 Thread Doug Hampshire
See Andy Webb's sig for a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking spam Something like: Congratulations!!! You've been selected by our steering committee to hand

  1   2   3   >