/forestprep versus exchange2000
Hi all,
W2kAD (w2k+sp4)
Exchange2000+Sp3
We plan to upgrade both our W2KAD(native) and W2KDcs to W2K3AD and W2K3
respectively.
We already have exchange2000+Sp3 already installed in our domain.
Could you please tell me if this article is needed, I am not sure if
Hi all,
W2kAD (w2k+sp4)
Exchange2000+Sp3
We plan to upgrade both our W2KAD(native) and W2KDcs to W2K3AD and W2K3 respectively.
We already have exchange2000+Sp3 already installed in our domain.
Could you please tell me if this article is needed, I am not sure if this article
("ma
features like automated deletion of messages
once they age past the regulatory requirements.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
Problem is
Discussions
Subject: Re: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
Problem is that that way of archiving email isn't a legal option here in
the
US. You need a different solution to be compliant with the rulings that
are
in effect. The KVS solution (www.kvsinc.com) which Ben referred to is
for
ins
November 10, 2003 8:04 AM
Subject: RE: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
I wrote some batch files that use ExMerge and export the contents of the
archive mailbox to a new PST file every day. Then all these PST files
get zipped up. Then I do whatever I want with those zip files, for
example burn
Subject: RE: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
Well, you can, yes, but not via "rules", per se. In Exchange System
Manager, you go to the Mailbox Store properties, and on the bottom is a
check box to archive all messages sent or received by this mailbox store
to a specific location. It is
---Original Message-
From: Olle Gustafson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:53 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
Subject: Automatic archive in Exchange2000
Hi,
Is it possible to set rules (or something like that)
Hi,
Is it possible to set rules (or something like that) on an Exchange2000
server for automatic archiving? I know it can be done in Outlook but is it
possible to set it on the server? If so, how?
_
List posting FAQ: http
Cc: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; Exchange Discussions
Subject: FIXED RE: [Exchange2000] Problems with E2K SP3 bridgehead
Well it looks like a call to PSS has identified and shot down my
problem.
It seems there is a big difference in the way DNS queries are handled by
the SMTP VIRTUAL SERVER over DNS
: Exchange2000 To Exchange 2000 Migration
I have a client needing to migrate about 6000 users from one Exchange
2000
Organization to another Exchange 2000 migration (InterOrg)... Does
anyone
have any good tools or places to look for resources?
thanks
I have a client needing to migrate about 6000 users from one Exchange 2000
Organization to another Exchange 2000 migration (InterOrg)... Does anyone
have any good tools or places to look for resources?
thanks...
_
List posting FAQ:
Hello !
We have just finished migrating our Exchange 5.5 users
to Exchange 2000.
A two-way-trust was established between
the domains.
The users log on in NT domain and the Exchange2000 server
is in W2K domain . The rights on mailboxes is set in the
following way : user in NT domain is
Hello !
We have just finished migrating our Exchange 5.5 users
to Exchange 2000.
A two-way-trust was established between
the domains.
The users log on in NT domain and the Exchange2000 server
is in W2K domain . The rights on mailboxes is set in the
following way : user in NT domain is
l Message-
From: Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:14 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Exchange2000 permissions
Subject: Exchange2000 permissions
We have just discovered that any user can open any other users mailbox.
I have been trying to find
We have just discovered that any user can open any other users mailbox. I
have been trying to find a list of what the default permissions should be
with no luck. Domain Users has all but full control at the top level of
the mailbox store which I am guessing is bad. I am a little reluctant to
be mes
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:13 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
Subject: RE
Ah, I guess it's a restore then.
Sounds like an ideal job for the person that used ESM to delete the
folders!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2003 17:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
lanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:49 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
John,
What
ECTED]
Sent: 08 July 2003 22:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions
Subject: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
Got a question for everyone on the lists:
If someone deletes a tree of public folders, and I restore the
previous day's backup, then allow the log files to play
Thank you for the info.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public
folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post
I just tested this fix
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:13 AM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public
folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public
folders as
Can someone else please try this so that we don't have to be the first
one? Just kidding.
Has anyone tried this yet?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Exchange2000] Possible h
y, June 11, 2003 9:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] FW: Alert: Exchange 2000 Store Shuts Down
After NAI AV Software Update
I just talked to NAI support and this is not an issue with any
particular dat file, it's an issue with GroupShield 5.2 for Exchange
2000 in ge
]
--
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:00 AM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Undergrou
nd "MEC ED" List Event
> N
"Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Undergrou
nd "MEC ED" List Event
> Miller Light ?
>
> ** Please prefix your subject
No, he's quite heavy.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Tuip [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Underg
-
From: "Andy David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Undergrou
nd "MEC ED" List Event
> Don't forget, I&#x
Don't forget, I'm on a doctor-supervised "beer only" diet, so I will need a
special meal when I get there.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Hi all,
MSX2000+SP3
I am using the following article
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 I have got
this error when starting the RESTORE (using NTBACKUP from a server different
than the exchange server), for the restore I have selected logfiles+mailbox
store+public fold
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling accounts in AD/Exchange2000
We are having the same problem. When you disable the account do you delete
the mailbox? Deleting the mailbox may very well solve your problems and you
can recover deleted mailboxes now in Exchange 2000.
-Original
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling accounts in AD/Exchange2000
We are having the same problem. When you disable the account do you delete
the mailbox? Deleting the
: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disabling accounts in AD/Exchange2000
We are having the same problem. When you disable the account do you
delete the mailbox? Deleting the mailbox may very well solve your
problems and you can recover deleted mailboxes now
;
>-Original Message-
>From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:41 AM
>To: Exchange Discussions
>Subject: Re: Disabling accounts in AD/Exchange2000
>
>
>
>Depends on circumstances of the employee leaving. Either you still want
ons
Subject: Re: Disabling accounts in AD/Exchange2000
Depends on circumstances of the employee leaving. Either you still want
to
recieve mail or not.
>
>Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
>after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving
--
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Disabling accounts in
Depends on circumstances of the employee leaving. Either you still want to
recieve mail or not.
Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving my Exchange
2000 SP3 servers a headache. The disabled accounts are
Our corporate policy is to disable an employee's account for 30 days
after they are no longer employed. This seems to be giving my Exchange
2000 SP3 servers a headache. The disabled accounts are causing Event Id
9548 in the application log.
Is there a "best practice" for how to handle accounts w
: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Exchange2000 to a new server
>
>
> Missy is absolutely right (and a better pool player than I
> am) -- it isn't
> worth the hassle to try and keep the same name. If your old
> server was
>
d
keep the same name?
thanks,
-ER
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2000 to a new server
Always the easiest way to do this is
http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange2000 to a new server
Always the easiest way to do this is
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm. Why do you feel you
must retain the old server name? That is seldom if ever really
necessary.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server
MSX2000+SP3
1forest,1Org
We have bought a new server to move and
Message -
> From: "Microsoft Exchange List Server"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:14 PM
> Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server
>
>
> MSX2000+SP3
> 1fo
"Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server
MSX2000+SP3
1forest,1Org
We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current
exchange2000 server.
Will be enough to obtain an exchang
the name of our current
exchange2000 server.
Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then
remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000
restore over it..to make it operational in the new box?
any other conside
MSX2000+SP3
1forest,1Org
We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current
exchange2000 server.
Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then
remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000
restore over it..to make it
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 10/02/2003 19:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: FW: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB
This is going on in the Exchange2000 forum
And James confused me, I think two people same question different forum
k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB
This is
This is going on in the Exchange2000 forum
k
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Veritas 9/BLB
I have read the claims too. Sure it may be a usefull feature. I&#
Hi.
We are running Exchange 2000 in mixed mode. We are migrating people from
5.5 by moving their mailboxes to an E2K server. For various reasons, our
users on Exchange 2000 servers who use OWA do so by going to an Exchange 5.5
OWA. They can do everything they could before they were moved, e
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
>
>
> She's offsite and a true user. She has troubles logging in.
> I might have
> to have her bring in
I have it but I have never had a change to install it on her PC.
Again, my crying fit.
- Original Message -
From: "Mellott, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Exc
VNC?
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
Server A is gone.
Trying to walk her through creating a new profile is what my crying fit was
about.
Thanks
Gotcha. A cold beer usually dries my tears :0
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
Server A is gone.
Trying to walk her through creating a new
Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
> That's wonderful.
> What about my questions?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discus
That's wonderful.
What about my questions?
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
She's offsite and a true user. She has troubles logg
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
> Is Server A still up?
> Why not just recreate the Outlook profile?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, M
Is Server A still up?
Why not just recreate the Outlook profile?
-Original Message-
From: David McSpadden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Exchange2000] Dialup Access
I have a
4 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
>
>
> Yes
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subjec
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
Based on the subject line should we then assume this is an E2K server?
> -Origi
gt; Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
>
> It seems that folks at http://www.intermedia.net/ have figured it out.
> They
> bill based on the total disk space used by a customer. Although their
> setup
> seems to be based on Exchange 5.5 - it smells like 5.5 and l
riginal Message-
From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
Thought I'd try over here. Seems to be a bit more complicated than I
thought.
Brian
-Original Messa
Based on the subject line should we then assume this is an E2K server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
>
Thought I'd try over here. Seems to be a bit more complicated than I
thought.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Narkinsky, Brian
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Exchange2000] Script to report mailbox sizes
Is there a quick easy way to autom
No, you prefer Space Kitty!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for
Exchange2000?
I prefer Miss Kitty.
-Original Message-
From
prevention for
Exchange2000?
We use Tumbleweed here. Not a bad product - but like with all of this
kind of content filtering stuff - "a man has got to know his
limitations".
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002
We use Tumbleweed as well. It's ok. Their support sucks though. I guess
they had some financial problems and laid off half of their support staff.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Disc
Then rinse.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?
User education. Repeat as necessary.
-Original Message-
We use Tumbleweed here. Not a bad product - but like with all of this kind
of content filtering stuff - "a man has got to know his limitations".
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: external client+firewall+exchange2000
Importance: High
MSX2000,SP2 native mode
Win2000 mixed mode 1 Global catalog different than MSX2000
External users (travelers) are not able to use outlook despite we followed
Q270836 our MSX2000 is behind a pix
I suggest you use a VPN.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 14:20
> An: Exchange Discussions
> Betreff: external client+firewall+exchange2000
> Wichtigkeit: Hoch
>
>
>
> MSX
Use a VPN instead or since you are using E2k, have them use the
fancy-schmancy OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: external client+firewall+exchange2000
Importance: High
MSX2000,SP2 native mode
Win2000 mixed mode 1 Global catalog different than MSX2000
External users (travelers) are not able to use outlook despite we followed
Q270836 our MSX2000 is behind a pix firewall any suggestions on how to
configure this the outlook clients are receiving a message that the
filtering, but
you're much better off purchasing a third party software.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange2000
I had heard that Exchange 2000 has bui
: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:41 AM
Subject: Exchange2000
I had heard that Exchange 2000 has built in protection for content
filtering
and spamming. Is this true? If so, then can anyone point me to
documentation about it? I am still searching on Microsoft's website as
I
send this. Anyone th
I had heard that Exchange 2000 has built in protection for content filtering
and spamming. Is this true? If so, then can anyone point me to
documentation about it? I am still searching on Microsoft's website as I
send this. Anyone that has information would be helpful, I'm writing a
document f
Discussed in the Release Notes.
Ian Moran
Konnexion Ltd
> -Original Message-
> From: George Vijay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 December 2001 14:38
> To: Exchange Discussions (E-mail); Exchange2000 (E-mail)
> Subject: [Exchange2000] Exchange management service
I think I might abandon the cluster idea...
Thank you Missy, Robert, and Andy.
-botp
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
I'
I'd say it's darn close to impossible...
M
- Original Message -
From: "Peña, Botp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault
tions & Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: [Exc
=
-Original Message-
From: "Peña, Botp" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
Thanks, sir Andy.
I have seen firewalls clusters and web farm
vices
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: "Peña, Botp" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Excha
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
cool and great!
At last, I can hear good news :-)
Sir Robert, how long has the cluster been running (without downtime)?
Did you have some difficulty? (You could share your experience off list
since this topic is too
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
we have a 2-node active/passive exchange 2000 cluster running fine. i can
fail the exchange group over, and downtime is generally around 60 seconds
: "Peña, Botp" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
Thanks, sir Andy.
I have seen firewalls clusters and web farms in action. And was quite very
impressed. None yet for Exchange
11:49 AM
To: '"Peña, Botp"'
Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Exchange Fault Tolerance
Definitely 1. 2 is a matter of your expertise and the ultimate roi of the
clustered solution in your environment.
I think clusters have their place, but it's more with applications which
beha
ou're responsible not the mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz
8-16-01
>>>- Original Message -
>>>From: "Daniele Melo - Projetos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Exchange (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>>>"'Exchange2000 (E-m
You need to do this by exporting, foobling the resultant file, and importing
the changes.
A couple cross-posts, eh?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Daniele Melo - Projetos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "
87 matches
Mail list logo
