-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Posted At: 13 January 2004 13:33
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server --
EX2003
Subject: RE: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end
ments for Front end/ Back end server -- EX2003
Dear All,
I am getting ready to upgrade an Exch 5.5 system running on NT4 to Exch
2003 on Win 2003 and am trying to decide whther or not to use a front
end server. I will have approx. 100 users accessing this server via
POP3/IMAP and another 30 or s
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: JohLex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware requirements for
, January 12, 2004 5:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server --
EX2003
There used to be a FE/BE document on http://www.microsoft.com/ISN
I don't know if it is still there.
Based on my own experience at the previous place, we ran tw
From: JohLex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hardware requirements for Front end/ Back end server -- EX2003
Dear All,
I am getting ready to upgrade an Exch 5.5 system running on NT4 to Exch
2003 on Win 2003 and am trying to d
Dear All,
I am getting ready to upgrade an Exch 5.5 system running on NT4 to Exch 2003 on Win
2003 and am trying to decide whther or not to use a front end server. I will have
approx. 100 users accessing this server via POP3/IMAP and another 30 or so via OWA.
Additionally I will have another 20
separate virtual servers for each domain, but then you would need
to use additional IP addresses.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:mwoodruff@;inchord.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end/Back-end config
What good is
-end/Back-end config
http://FDQN/customerabc
or http://IPAddress/customerabc
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:mwoodruff@;inchord.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end/Back-end config
I can hit the directories with
sic Authentication
Default domain: \
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:mwoodruff@;inchord.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end/Back-end config
How can you hit all directories with one namespace? Does Exchange 2k
know wh
http://FDQN/customerabc
or http://IPAddress/customerabc
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:mwoodruff@;inchord.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end/Back-end config
I can hit the directories with server/directory, but
I can hit the directories with server/directory, but how do you use a
single url to hit all of them?
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-end/Back-end config
I
: Front-end/Back-end config
I have FE/BE config with the generic FE/BE virtual directories, plus I
have a few customers for whom I created their "dedicated" OWA virtual
directories.
I did the generic ones by following the whitepaper. I did the
"dedicated" using the method
-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front-end/Back-end config
I am setting up our Front-end/Back-end config for our org. I have
installed a FE server (Enterprise:-)). I don't understand Microso
I am setting up our Front-end/Back-end config for our org. I have
installed a FE server (Enterprise:-)). I don't understand Microsofts
whitepaper on this. I want to create virtual directories to avoid all
the SSL certificates. When a virtual directory is created for a certain
domain,
1 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End / Back-End servers Exchange 2000
What's all this about virtual servers? When a user logs into a
front-end server it looks the user up in Active Directory and then
establishes a session with the appropriate back-end server. When
creating a
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front-End / Back-End servers Exchange 2000
I've setup my configuration with (2) front-end servers for OWA with
Netw
I've setup my configuration with (2) front-end servers for OWA with Network
Load Balancing - with 2 back-end servers
that contain all the user mailboxes.
front-end #1 points to back-end server #1 (virtual server for fe#1 )
front-end #2 points to back-end server #2 (virtual server for fe#2)
a FE/BE deployment and make it 'secure'.
Thanks for the pointer on the IPSec article.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 23:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
With OWA2000 ove
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24063
Looks like you need a subscription.[1]
William
[1] Hi Martin
-Original Message-
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Front-End/Back
Ok, where do I find Martin Tuip's article?
- Original Message -
From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> W
Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text
and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. H
More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text and since
Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said all that, I have to
do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end topology anyway ... so I'll just
get my coat :)
Mylo
---
From: Richard Leslie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
Would coming in thru the ISA server be better than an IIS server in the DMZ
running OWA? Not leading, just asking, not very familiar
Why? What's wrong with POP/IMAP?
IMAP4 over SSL for example.
Why would you rather give them Hotmail?
William
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Top
gt;
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
> SSL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End
I'd be happier giving them a hotmail account than POP/IMAP..
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 16:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
Let's see -
OWA = SSL
POP/IMAP = doesn'
Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
>
>
> How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you
> don't put it in a DMZ?
>
>
&g
ylo
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 16:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
How would you expect to secure Exchange and put it in a DMZ?
Let's say that you "secure" the box by putting i
SSL
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you don't put it in
a DMZ?
riginal Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
How do you guys secure exchange with OWA an
Secondary Authentication at the firewall
Publish OWA on an ISA server in DMZ
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 13:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
How do you guys secure exchange
Matt,
Publishing everything behind the firewall and run inbound services over SSL.
Mylo
PS: Thanks for all the feedback.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 14:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology
How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you don't put it in a DMZ?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
There s
There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message;
"Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ"
"PST=BAD"
"BLB=BAD"
Etc
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussi
Go with your instincts. Keep it out of the DMZ.
There's lots of history on this in the archives of this list.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: "Myles, Damian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18,
Posted this on the ISA forums a few days ago, but thought it might be an idea to post
for discussion.
A while back I tested a FE/BE topology with the FE server sitting on or DMZ, opening
numerous ports on our interior firewall to allow AD/GC lookups through etc. Now it
comes to actual putting
Do you have separate subnets for your back-end and front-end servers?
If you do, can a computer on the front-end subnet talk to the computer on
the back-end subnet?
Does your back-end computer only have a internal IP address?
Back when I originally configured a front-end/back-end solution, I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front-end &
What method are you using to transfer messages from the front-end systems to
the back?
Did you check DNS?
- John Q
- Original Message -
From: "Bravo, Liliana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26,
Hi
MSX2000, SP2
We have one fornt-ened server and two back-end servers the mailboxes in the
bak-end servers are not receiving email messages we have noticed that the
front-end server build the queue up to the respective bak-end server but the
message never arrives to the back-end but a NDR is rec
40 matches
Mail list logo
