RE: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-14 Thread Blouin, Peter
We were using CA's Innoculate, which like Arcserve, did not work well. We switched to Sybari Antigen for Exchange which does a great job. We have a two tier setup: first level is our bridgeheads/gateways; second level is at the Exchange server (clusters) itself. Antigen is running at both levels.

RE: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-14 Thread msharik
from the archives ** The Top Ten Reasons why William Doesn't recommend Brick-level backups: 10. The only product he's tried it with is ArcServeIT (*shudder*) 9. Brick-level backups sho

RE: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-13 Thread .DL Helpdesk
TVD suite - works great. JJ -Original Message- From: Barber Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Antivirus and Backups We're currently running NAV for Exchange 2.13 and I must say the product stinks

Re: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-12 Thread missy koslosky
These are two issues. TrendMicro's ScanMail and Sybari's Antigen are the favored A/V solutions for this list. Brick backups are dog slow by virtue of how they work - a MAPI call is made to each item in a mailbox in order to gather the data that belongs to that mailbox. You will never achieve a

RE: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
NAV-Exchange has worked great for me for a few years. You're a few revisions behind, too. I agree their support website sucks. > -Original Message- > From: Barber Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 08:03 AM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List >

RE: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-12 Thread Jim Helfer
Huh. 2 postings again. I use NAV, and I've never had a problem with it. If you are using just MAPI, I think that there is an architectural limit that prevents it from completely guaranting that a virus won't get through in times of heavy load. I use plain old NTbackup and I've not se

Re: Antivirus and Backups

2001-09-12 Thread Daniel Chenault
brick-level backup is a bad idea. The throughput is bad no matter what you do. - Original Message - From: "Barber Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:02 AM Subject: Antivirus and Backups > We're currently running