Do the users eventually get a case of keyphobia? :)
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
You can use ISA. It's not that hard to set up and works
-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
It is my understanding that even if I publish OWA through ISA I still
have to open 389, 88, and 53(if we don't use host files) to our networ
bject: RE: OWA Design Question
It is my understanding that even if I publish OWA through ISA I still
have to open 389, 88, and 53(if we don't use host files) to our network
for authentication. So it seems that I will just save my self from
opening ports for GC Queries and RPC Traffic.
---
d for
instance) to proxy the connection from the DMZ.
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
int
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Posted At: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:28 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
Conversation: OWA Design Question
Subject: RE: OWA Design Question
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
internet is 8
If you publish OWA through ISA, all you need to open outbound to the
internet is 80 and/or 443 for OWA to function.
If you place a FE server in the DMZ you still have to open 80 and/or 443
outbound to the Internet and open 389, 3268, 88, 53, 135, 1024+ back to
your BE Exchange servers.
At least t
6 matches
Mail list logo