Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Viewing Public Folder Permissions via Outlook
Also, is the group a mail-enabled universal group?
Ed Crowley
, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Viewing Public Folder Permissions via Outlook
The user is a member of a group that has "editor" permissions assigned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday,
] On Behalf Of Bryon Barkley
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Viewing Public Folder Permissions via Outlook
The user is a member of a group that has "editor" permissions assigned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
The user is a member of a group that has "editor" permissions assigned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Viewing Public Folder Permi
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Viewing Public Folder Permissions via Outlook
EK2K, SP3 & Outlook 2K
I have a user that cannot access properties of a public folder via Outlook.
When the user right clicks on any public folder and selects properties,
nothing happens. The user must be able to ac
EK2K, SP3 & Outlook 2K
I have a user that cannot access properties of a public folder via
Outlook. When the user right clicks on any public folder and selects
properties, nothing happens. The user must be able to access the Summary
tab on properties in order to see who the folder contacts are.
I have an AD domain with a 2 way trust to an NT4 domain. The exchange 5.5
site has its service account in the nt4 domain and all mail servers are
members of the nt4 domain. users in the ad domain have their accounts as
primary's on their mailboxes. they also have reviewer permission on all
public f
Nevermind. forgot to look at one set of tools *sigh*.
Long week... glad it's friday.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
Posted At: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:40 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Public Folder Permissions
Subject: Public F
mixed 5.5 and e2k.
Public folders on both. ~9000 public folders
We are planning to move a big chunk of users to e2k. They are the users
who use the aforementioned public folders.
Problem: Exchange 5.5 users with Windows NT4.0 Associated external
accounts. Public folder permissions (not client
Behalf Of Bryon Barkley
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 8:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Assigning Public Folder Permissions
You can propagate these settings via the ESM in Exch2k by setting
permissions at a top-level folder and then propagate them down to all
subfolders.
-Original
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Assigning Public Folder Permissions
Does anyone know of a tool that will allow me to assign public folder
permissions to multiple folders at the same time?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Does anyone know of a tool that will allow me to assign public folder
permissions to multiple folders at the same time?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com
Hi,
This is just a caveat for those of you who may have applied particular
Information Store hotfixes for Exchange 2000 SP3.
Information Store hotfix 6336 (no longer available for download) broke the
behaviour whereby Exchange will convert a Universal Distribution Group to
a Universal Security Gr
Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Permissions within Exchange 2000
Having recently converted to Exchange 2000 I may ask some obvious
questions so I apologise in advance. Currently have been setting up my
Public Folders and need to change the permissions on a top level folder
and then propogate the
Having recently converted to Exchange 2000 I may ask some obvious
questions so I apologise in advance. Currently have been setting up my
Public Folders and need to change the permissions on a top level folder
and then propogate the changes down to all other folders. Here is my
problem the propogate
I have two userids - one is a domain admin and the other is a regular domain
user.
The domain user account is linked to my mailbox. The domain admin account
does not have a mailbox.
About two weeks ago we migrated public folders from E5.5 to E2K and I am now
finding that I cannot access most pu
You may want to look at the pfadmin tool. It's a command line utility, but
is very useful.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions
How can I c
actually its in the general tab of the pb
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions
go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on
permissions its all in there
go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on
permissions its all in there.
-Original Message-
From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions
How can I change a
How can I change a permission on a top level folder,
and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders?
I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have
changed?
Anything that I obvious that I am missing?
Phil
_
Thanks, this has been very helpful
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
Bad phrase of mine probably, but take a look at Q262054.
"If
January 09, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
You're not a domain or enterprise admin are you? This definitely fouls
things up.
If so, remove your account from these groups and retry. We always use a
secondary account and the Run As featur
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
You're not a domain or enterprise admin are you? This definitely fouls
things up.
If so, remove your account from these groups and retry. We always use a
secondary account and the Run As feature for admin type tasks.
Rgrds
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2002 17:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
ESM, it won't let me get to the permissions page in outlook because I'm not
the owner. Its only effecting me as the exchange admin :-( if I apply
permissions to other peop
sage-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
How are you making the change - via Outlook, ESM or M: drive?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL P
How are you making the change - via Outlook, ESM or M: drive?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2002 17:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
I have an issue where I can make myself a folder owner, go back
I have an issue where I can make myself a folder owner, go back into the
properties and my entry has vanished again.
E2000 SP1
Win2000 SP2
Anyone seen that before
Thanks
Mike
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resourc
ange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Many thanks for hijacking this thread.
BTW. I have not been able to assign a DL to a PF and allow them to:
- assign perms / add users to the PF
- create and manage subfolders
- prohibit them from removing the &qu
ublic Folder Permissions
Many thanks for hijacking this thread.
BTW. I have not been able to assign a DL to a PF and allow them to:
- assign perms / add users to the PF
- create and manage subfolders
- prohibit them from removing the "parent" folder
Example of f
Many thanks for hijacking this thread.
BTW. I have not been able to assign a DL to a PF and allow them to:
- assign perms / add users to the PF
- create and manage subfolders
- prohibit them from removing the "parent" folder
Example of folder structure
- Public Folders
|
|-
Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
I am heading to New Orleans for a week, leaving this Friday. I can pick up
the "proper materials" while I am down there :)
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Soft
001 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Is this some type of plan to throw a coup on the Secret Circle Inner
Cabel Which Does Not Exist?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Tu
Excellent, excellent ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
I am heading to New Orleans for a week, leaving this Friday. I can pick up
|
| cc:
Oh I am totally up for that girlfriend!!
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
A virtual coven sounds like a good idea. . .maybe we could work up
And how do you know we're not already in the Secret Inner Circle Cabal which
Does Not Exist?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Is
To our flock be true...
As long as that coven doesnt include an oven, I'm in! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
BAA RAM EWE.
You a
Folder Permissions
A virtual coven sounds like a good idea. . .maybe we could work up a
banishing and get rid of M. Hanji.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder
A virtual coven sounds like a good idea. . .maybe we could work up a banishing and get
rid of M. Hanji.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
That'll do pig. That'll do.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
That'll do pig. That'll do.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
No. But using Owner will do; don't need to be admin.
-O
No. But using Owner will do; don't need to be admin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If we assign "admin" rights to the
PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
>
>
> If we assign "admin" rights to the NT accounts for the DL's,
> would that require that the "admins" use
rself
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
This of course would be easy enough to test out you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
This of course would be easy enough to test out you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If we assign "admin" rights to the NT ac
2001 7:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Many users can be owners of one dl. Add their nt account under the
permissions tab in admin and give them admin rights to the dl.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: M
Public Folder Permissions
We would have set Dlists except you can have only 1 owner of a Dlist, in
cases there are 2-5 people who need to be "Owners" of a folder.
Unfortunately: A dlist cannot be an owner of a dlist.
Regards
Jason Tuffin
-Original Message-
From: HANNA, Keith (T
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Why modify the permissions of the folders?
Give a DL permission, and set the team lead as owner of the DL, then just
add & remove from the DL
That's the way we
09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Mike
Thankyou for your comments, but our requirement is to have the team leaders
of each of the groups (about 800) modify the permissions of their folders as
staff move between teams quite regularly, and other people ne
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
If the folders were permissioned with dlists then these team leaders would
only need to edit the dlists and not the PF permissions directly.
-Original Message-
Fro
Public Folder Permissions
Mike
Thankyou for your comments, but our requirement is to have the team leaders
of each of the groups (about 800) modify the permissions of their folders as
staff move between teams quite regularly, and other people need access
temporarily to assist with operations
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
Don't give users Owner permissions on the top level folder. Reserve that
permission to your Exchange admins.
stry hack on your
machine so you can easily recover those items.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
vely, you could use Publishing Editor which gives most of your
requests.
Tris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October 2001 08:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions
I am having a little difficulty with &quo
I am having a little difficulty with "owners" of folders deleting the top
level folder for their group. Our environment has 500 or so Org Units and
each org unit has a public folder visible to the whole org unit. Within the
Org unit we assign 1 or 2 users with "owner" rights, and the rest of the
m
Nope that works too.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 14, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though
they are removed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 September 2001 14:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
Far be it from me to disagree with a Great Old One such as yourself, CJ, but
I beg to differ with you on this one. I just tested this, and adding a test
account to a group
I agree with Mike, ... this is a procedure we use all the time with DLs and
PFs ... sorry O great one ...
>From: Mike Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
bject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
As they exist now, yes. If you add people to the DL, they will not get
permissions. The DL is expanded at the time the permissions are granted. The
permissions are then handed out on a mailbox by mailbox basis.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh C
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions for DL
I know I should know this, but my brain isn'
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public folder permissions for DL
I know I should know this, but my brain isn't working today. If I create a
Distribution Lis
I know I should know this, but my brain isn't working today. If I create a
Distribution List and grant the list permissions to a public folder does
that mean that all the members of that list get that permission (Author in
this case)? This is EX5.5SP4 on W2K.
-Walden
Walden H Leveri
62 matches
Mail list logo
