[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-24 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8/23/05 10:06 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> Or maybe he's counting the days until he can do so. > > > > > > W

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 10:06 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> Or maybe he's counting the days until he can do so. > > > > Why should he ditch the crown? > > Because it makes him look like a cult zombie and the laugh

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcg

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have judged judgment to be a bad thing. Ok. I get it. Thanks for explaining. I haven't. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Cliff
Gee, Rick. Why don't you tell us what you REALLY think? If there were some connection I could perceive between Movement plans and pronouncements and the reality I see around me (like no pundits, no big buildings, nothing but economically disastrous business ventures that I know of, etc.), it migh

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Rick Archer
on 8/23/05 10:06 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Or maybe he's counting the days until he can do so. > > Why should he ditch the crown? Because it makes him look like a cult zombie and the laughing stock of all his peers? Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfrie

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Turq

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > > With su

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Notice that it took less than three hours for

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8/23/05 12:13 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Nobody here, as far as I can tell, has much of an > > idea of who King Tony is and what he'd be capable > > of on his own. Maybe it's more than some of

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "au

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Notice that it took less than three hours for

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Patrick Gillam
Comments below. > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict, > > > why not bide our time and withhold judgment? > > > --- "Patrick Gillam" wrote > > > Sounds like a prescription for living one's entire life.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The TMO is a classic personality-led movement. The > personality has decided the course that movement > will take after his death and hand-picked the people > he wants to take it there. However, once he's dead, he can

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Notice that it took less than three hours for B

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patric

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Notice that it took less than three hours for Barry > > to go back on his word not to respond to me directly > > or indirectly. > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > > With s

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > What's Hagelin afraid of? Being kicked out of the Movement now > > > while MMY is alive if he WERE to speak up? > > > > > > So

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > > With su

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 12:13 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > > > With suc

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Nobody here, as far as I can tell, has much of an > > idea of who King Tony is and what he'd be capable > > of on his own. Maybe it's more than some of

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Notice that it took less than three hours for Barry > > to go back on his word not to respond to me directly > > or indirectly. > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Vaj
On 8/23/05 1:57 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Notice that it took less than three hours for Barry > to go back on his word not to respond to me directly > or indirectly. True love is timeless. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Notice that it took less than three hours for Barry > to go back on his word not to respond to me directly > or indirectly. > IMO he enjoys baiting you, because you always take the bait. Ignore the hook next time. As

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Waiting until the time is right to challenge the > > status quo is another term for preserving the > > status quo. > > Good point

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
Notice that it took less than three hours for Barry to go back on his word not to respond to me directly or indirectly. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > authfrien

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > authfriend wrote: > > > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict,

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 12:13 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Rick Archer
on 8/23/05 12:13 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Nobody here, as far as I can tell, has much of an >>> idea of who King Tony is and what

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Nobody here, as far as I can tell, has much of an > > idea of who King Tony is and what he'd be capable > > of on his own. Maybe it's more than some of

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > authfriend wrote: > > > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict, > > why not bide our time and withhold judgment? > > Sounds like a prescription for livi

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Rick Archer
on 8/23/05 10:41 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nobody here, as far as I can tell, has much of an > idea of who King Tony is and what he'd be capable > of on his own. Maybe it's more than some of us > expect. That he isn't able to show it while MMY > is still alive isn't at all sur

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread Patrick Gillam
authfriend wrote: > > With such an overwhelmingly major change > on the horizon, whose outcome none of us can predict, > why not bide our time and withhold judgment? Sounds like a prescription for living one's entire life. - PJG Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are we even close to talking about truth and reconciliation? > > > Alignment? Evidently

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-23 Thread dhamiltony2k5
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are we even close to talking about truth and reconciliation? > > Alignment? Evidently not. It may be that nothing can happen until > > MMY is gone, as John Hagelin did say in that

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-17 Thread Peter
--- markmeredith2002 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Last week Kelly Kirkpatrick did try with > > > an editorial > > > published on the Fairfield Ledger's opinion page > > > (Thurs Aug11-05). It > > > was a

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-17 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Last week Kelly Kirkpatrick did try with > > an editorial > > published on the Fairfield Ledger's opinion page > > (Thurs Aug11-05). It > > was a noteworthy piece to pop up on the opinion page > > because it does

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > > "dhamiltony2k5" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread Peter
--- shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "dhamiltony2k5" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are we even close to talking about truth and > reconciliation? > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are we even close to talking about truth a

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are we even close to talking about truth and reconciliation? > > Alignment? Evidently not. It may be that nothing can happen

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The problem with the modern TM movement is that > > it's trying to insist that to appreciate its > > company's products you have

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Are we even close to talking about truth and reconciliation? > > Alignment? Evidently not. It may be that nothing can happen

[FairfieldLife] Re: Defending the Status Quo

2005-08-16 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we even close to talking about truth and reconciliation? > Alignment? Evidently not. It may be that nothing can happen until > MMY is gone, as John Hagelin did say in that public meeting in the > Public Libr