Judy, I accept your analysis of this. Point on. Very clear. I retract my flawed
argument about this. It is not always possible to discern what someone intends
from what they say. It is *always* clear to them. What I think is always clear
to 'me'. But when I put it out there, that is not the case
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> I was pointing out what I thought was a veiled ad hominem by
> Judy.
It wasn't "veiled," it was right up front.
> This is not necessarily absolutely clear because normal
> language is rather loose logically. What I did, w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> > Well, you know Xeno, whenever I read what you have to write I find it
> > almost always 100% intelligent and absolutely nonintrusive. I am unable to
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
> Well, you know Xeno, whenever I read what you have to write I find it almost
> always 100% intelligent and absolutely nonintrusive. I am unable to know if
> you are correct or not in what you say here but the manner of how you said it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Xenophaneros,
>
> [note that the following by Robin Carlsen was run through
> http://www.textcompactor.com/ to produce an executive summary. No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> Dear Xenophaneros,
[note that the following by Robin Carlsen was run through
http://www.textcompactor.com/ to produce an executive summary. Now while that
might make some of the arguments put forth spartan of potentially necessary
" and you hit send and I love you for that too!
>
>
>
> From: awoelflebater
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:29 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
>
>
> Â
>
> God Emily, what a
Fantastic rhythm in Brother's text! :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "stevelf" wrote:
>
> brother Robin--- you have a beautiful heart..
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Vajradhatu,,
> >
> > I have stormed the barricades, looked the dev
brother Robin--- you have a beautiful heart..
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
> Dear Vajradhatu,,
>
> I have stormed the barricades, looked the devil in the eye, ransacked my life,
> cried in plaintive tones to the universe, and for the life of me, I find there
reated of them in his mind in order to ward
off the perceived threat they pose.
>
>
> ____________________
> From: turquoiseb
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:25 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still l
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
>
> > All you have to do is find some other way to refute what Vaj said.
>
> Do you guys really have nothing else to do in your lives? She can twist
> things all you want, but if sh
On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
> All you have to do is find some other way to refute what Vaj said.
Do you guys really have nothing else to do in your lives? She can twist things
all you want, but if she missed the spirit of the message to begin with, all
authenti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
> > >
> > > No it doesn't. Did you skim the conversation between Robin
> > > and Share on personal and univ
and stopped
> assuming you are "right" all the time, you might not need to "skim"
> everything to support your constructed premises. Â
>
>
> ____
> From: turquoiseb
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
> >
> > No it doesn't. Did you skim the conversation between Robin
> > and Share on personal and universal love? One didn't need
> > to be a Maharishi-knower or TM-doer to enjoy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't have time to read more than a small part of what gets posted here,
> but I do want to say that I like Robin Carlsen. I think his views and
> experiences are interesting. I don't think it's necessary to be steeped in
> kn
Dear Xenophaneros,
If someone is refusing to take on the energy and intellectual form of one's
argumentand is deliberately avoiding the kind of clash out of which something
honestly can be learned, understood, revealedby this collision of views;then
if one of participants senses that the det
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
perceived threat they pose.
>
>
> ____________________
> From: turquoiseb
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:25 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
>
>
> Â
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- I
t" all the time, you might not need to "skim"
> everything to support your constructed premises. Â
>
>
>
> From: turquoiseb
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:25 AM
> Subject: [Fairfield
>From UC to Shoes and Strawberries: One Masked Zebra's Journey
RC, I sense a bestseller in the making (-:
From: Robin Carlsen
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:23 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still
Thank you for saying this. And for being so concise and clear. I'm also glad
Zebra is here in the menagerie with us (-:
From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:44 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who
ormer spiritual practices can understand it
and benefit from it.
Suffice it to say, teachers who actually do this are
very rare, because it's HARD TO DO. So much easier to
just rip off a bunch of pre-indoctrinated followers
of an existing trip and then "re-indoctrinate" them
to suit your
I don't have time to read more than a small part of what gets posted here, but
I do want to say that I like Robin Carlsen. I think his views and experiences
are interesting. I don't think it's necessary to be steeped in knowledge of MMY
to understand what Robin is saying (as someone has sugges
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > > Poetic ad hominems are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jul 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, V
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> > Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
> > to be is in relation to Maharishi. His whole spiel
> > *requires* in the listener a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > Vaj: Remember I've seen R. blow his stack enough times that I know
> > he's not always Mr. Sattva.
> >
> > Response: And y
knowledge).
> From: Robin Carlsen
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
>
>
> Â
>
>
> This Is Just To Say
>
> I have eaten
> the plums
On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Vaj: Remember I've seen R. blow his stack enough times that I know
he's not always Mr. Sattva.
Response: And you forgot to bring your flowers and fruit and a
white handkerchief. And you f
The fundamental *meanness* of these two people is
striking--not just in the sense of malicious,
wanting to do damage to someone; but in the sense
of *small*--limited, constricted, pinched.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > "But by the way you say something I want to remark on: 'Even such a
> > doctrine as the Incarnation may be believed by people like
> > yourself', as a mystery, till it is formula
On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
"But by the way you say something I want to remark on: 'Even such a
doctrine as the Incarnation may be believed by people like
yourself', as a mystery, till it is formulated, but as soon as it
is it seems dragged down to the world of pros
The reason Barry has his facts bassackwards is that
he abstains from reading Robin's posts, so all he
can do is make stuff up. Why he thinks he can convince
folks here who *do* read Robin's posts of his own
made-up version, when they know otherwise, is a
mystery.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
Vaj: Remember I've seen R. blow his stack enough times that I know he's not
always Mr. Sattva.
Response: And you forgot to bring your flowers and fruit and a white
handkerchief. And you forgot to fill out the form. And you didn't even talk to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> >
On Jul 19, 2012, at 9:49 AM, awoelflebater wrote:
Ah, but maybe you could have allowed them to go where straight
logic and analytic argument can not. Go where you are perhaps just
a tad softer, nicer, perhaps more human(e). It has to be in there
Vaj. You can show us, we want to see, at lea
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> >
On Jul 19, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> > Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
> > to be is in relation to Mahar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> > > Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
> > > to be is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> > Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
> > to be is in relation to Maharishi. His whole spiel
> > *requires* in the listen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
> > Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
> > to be is in relation to Maharishi. His whole spiel
> > *requires* in the listener a
On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
RC strikes me as *dependent* on Maharishi. Still.
Almost everything he says that he is or pretends
to be is in relation to Maharishi. His whole spiel
*requires* in the listener a knowledge of Maharishi
and what he taught to make any sense of it.
On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:09 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
Come on, Vaj: You'll love it. Being straightforward, direct, true.
Read all that I have said here and address it head-on.
Have you ever considered doing a bardo retreat? Then death will no
longer be a mystery. Better to practice dying now
On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:14 AM, awoelflebater wrote:
Hey Vaj, I haven't spoken (written) to you for a while. Can I ask
you something? I know your history with Robin, I know you, but just
the teeniest bit, and I really have to wonder. For someone who
jumped into the early days of WTS and jump
say, teachers who actually do this are
very rare, because it's HARD TO DO. So much easier to
just rip off a bunch of pre-indoctrinated followers
of an existing trip and then "re-indoctrinate" them
to suit your needs. :-)
> ________________
> From: turquoiseb
To turqb: See? Hear? Understand? I rest my point, small point that it is.
From: Robin Carlsen
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
This
From: turquoiseb
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:02 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> Just as that high school hockey or football player
> still remin
This Is Just To Say
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > Just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> Just as that high school hockey or football player
> still reminisces on those golden days of yore, I
> could easily see how someone so strongly resonating
> with their past would tend to see the world still
> through those old daze. It mere
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote
> >
> > Jul 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> >
> > Robin1: Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to r
Dear Vajradhatu,,
I have stormed the barricades, looked the devil in the eye, ransacked my life,
cried in plaintive tones to the universe, and for the life of me, I find there
is no answer to your thoroughly comprehensive put-down and demolishment of my
post. I now know what Kingsley felt when New
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> I always thought a good "dark night of soul" book might be your next best
> move. Get writing kiddo. Even if you have to tap into Brahman like for The
> Discovery of Grace, hey I doubt the Big Guy would mind, ya know? Let your
> little heretic
On Jul 18, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> I have stormed the barricades, looked the devil in the eye, ransacked my
> life, cried in plaintive tones to the universe, and for the life of me, I
> find there is no answer to your thoroughly comprehensive put-down and
> demolishment of my
Dear Vajradhatu,,
I have stormed the barricades, looked the devil in the eye, ransacked my life,
cried in plaintive tones to the universe, and for the life of me, I find there
is no answer to your thoroughly comprehensive put-down and demolishment of my
post. I now know what Kingsley felt whe
On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote
>
> Jul 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
>
> Robin1: Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to read what
> Share Long has posted, then my post in response to her pos
On 07/18/2012 09:13 AM, Vaj wrote:
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:01 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
>
>> It's fascinating, Vaj, but I really feel such a distance
>> from Maharishi in every possible way -- emotionally, spir-
>> itually, and intellectually -- that I can't work up enough
>> interest to read anythi
swamp (-:
From: merudanda
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
thanks for the Golden heart -that so tender and generous before the world
unfolded itself
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> It's fascinating, Vaj, but I really feel such a distance
> from Maharishi in every possible way -- emotionally, spir-
> itually, and intellectually -- that I can't work up enough
> interest to read anything by him these days, let alone
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote
Jul 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
Robin1: Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to read what
Share Long has posted, then my post in response to her post, a person would
form a certain portrait of this manin the
airfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
> Maharishi to Vaj
>
>
> Â
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote:
>
> > If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be
> > barred to the sentimental?
>
> Becaus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, merudanda wrote:
>
> thanks for the Golden heart -that so tender and generous
> before the world unfolded itself
I've been moving...and busy...and thus not reading
FFL very much, so I don't know what you're referring
to with the phrase "golden heart." But t
Perhaps the Tao too?! Very crowded eye ball (-:
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:05 PM
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Share Long wrote:
> But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao!
>
Perhaps charm is in the eyes of the beholder?
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:01 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
It's fascinating, Vaj, but I really feel such a distance
from Maharishi in every possible way -- emotionally, spir-
itually, and intellectually -- that I can't work up enough
interest to read anything by him these days, let alone
about him. He jus
But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao!
From: Vaj
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul 18, 2012
arts are very
very tender. Good to proceed gently...
>
>
>
>
> From: Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:15 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
Maharishi
>
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
> >
> > And for a perspective on Maharishi that I find unimpeachable
> > I recommend Robert McCutcheon's "Afterword and Witness
> > Testimonial" in Judy Bourque's *Robes of Silk Feet of Cla
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote:
> If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be
> barred to the sentimental?
Because the sentimental cling to preferences...otherwise they
wouldn't be sentimental...
dLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to read what Share Long
has posted, then
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Buck wrote:
>
> > I knew very little of the stories told in the film. It was rather
> > disconcerting.
>
>
> I believe if the parts of the interview with the Shankaracharya of
> Jyotir Math that were edi
ve that Life flows to and from me.
Share
From: Robin Carlsen
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:52 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to read
what Share Long has posted, then my post in response to her post, a
person would form a certain portrait of this man—in the abstract,
then. But presumably with some faint feel
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Buck wrote:
I knew very little of the stories told in the film. It was rather
disconcerting.
I believe if the parts of the interview with the Shankaracharya of
Jyotir Math that were edited out of the movie are eventually included
on the DVD, that will be ex
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
And for a perspective on Maharishi that I find unimpeachable I
recommend Robert McCutcheon's "Afterword and Witness Testimonial"
in Judy Bourque's *Robes of Silk Feet of Clay* (pp. 213-219). Quite
definitive, I think.
I've not read it,
om: Robin Carlsen
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:15 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
>
>
> Â
> And for a perspective on Maharishi that I find unimpeachable I recommend
> Robert McC
that hearts are very very
tender. Good to proceed gently...
From: Robin Carlsen
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:15 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank Maharishi
And for a perspecti
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
But what did YOU think of him, Vaj? What was your own
individualized perception and experience of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi?
You will never tell us this.
He always reminded me of a Hindu rug salesman, kinda greasy and
agenda-driven. I liked
Dear Vaj,
Here's the problem with your analysis, Vaj: If one were to read what Share Long
has posted, then my post in response to her post, a person would form a certain
portrait of this manin the abstract, then. But presumably with some faint
feeling of what this guy must have been like to kn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > this slide show brought tears to my eyes, love and gratitude overflowing
> >
> > unstressing will happen later (-:
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/wa
And for a perspective on Maharishi that I find unimpeachable I recommend Robert
McCutcheon's "Afterword and Witness Testimonial" in Judy Bourque's *Robes of
Silk Feet of Clay* (pp. 213-219). Quite definitive, I think.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 8
But what did YOU think of him, Vaj? What was your own individualized perception
and experience of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi? You will never tell us this.
But that said: Let us not start fighting here. :-)
I respect your family's apprehension of MMY. I know of persons (whose judgment
I trust) who ha
On Jul 18, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Robin Carlsen wrote:
Now this leaves open the question, then, of Maharishi's actual
status independently of TM (and everything else that was added to
this over time). Are there persons—not Indian saints in the
Himalayas—the saints in Rishikesh paid tribute to h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> this slide show brought tears to my eyes, love and gratitude overflowing
>
> unstressing will happen later (-:
>
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlffubR2N9Y&feature=youtu.be
this slide show brought tears to my eyes, love and g
86 matches
Mail list logo
