Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-08 16:57:00
EDT ---
Additionally, it seems I have to disable the automatic prov
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #36 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-11-08 16:44:22 EDT ---
Full review:
open64.src: W: name-repeated
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #35 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-10-25 19:15:37 EDT ---
Still here. I'll do the review soon.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #34 from Orion Poplawski 2009-10-23 18:44:48
EDT ---
We seem stalled here. Dominik, you still around?
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 15:43:59
EDT ---
It seems the AMD version is available in the open64 svn ser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-09 15:16:33
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Anyone know how different this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-06 15:48:54
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> > PS. Why do you have the empty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #29 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-04-06 15:23:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Oh, you're rig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-31 17:49:29
EDT ---
Oh, you're right, the build works for F10 x86_64 without th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-03-31 14:39:50 EDT ---
Because it WON'T work with gfortran, so do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-31 14:06:06
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Note that my specfile does not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #25 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-03-31 13:56:04 EDT ---
Note that my specfile does not depend on g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-31 10:25:08
EDT ---
Hmm, I can't get the bootstrapping to work. It fails when i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-03-31 06:04:20 EDT ---
OK, I tackled this last week and here are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-24 10:02:16
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I'm told by the developers that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #21 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-03-24 09:53:13 EDT ---
I'm told by the developers that it can be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-24 06:09:25
EDT ---
Thanks.
Fixed license tag, found other licenses using lice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-13 06:23:52
EDT ---
Cleaned up patches and spec file.
http://theory.physics.he
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 09:40:22
EDT ---
Disabled BUILD_OPTIMIZE=DEBUG which produces unwanted debug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-01-05 11:16:55
EDT ---
Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-12-12 11:54:07
EDT ---
Updated to 4.2.1.
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzleht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-26 13:30:35 EDT
---
Changed optimization memory limit, path
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 16:56:22 EDT
---
Still, in koji it doesn't seem to have a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 16:23:48 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> OK. Now I get
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 16:24:26 EDT
---
Oh, and the links
http://theory.physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 16:25:07 EDT
---
And it builds fine in rawhide x86_64 now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 01:56:08 EDT
---
OK. Now I get it to build and work in moc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-11 10:22:12 EDT
---
This package has to make it into rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-11 09:32:30 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hmm, it seems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-11 04:00:49 EDT
---
Or, I could compile open64 with itself by
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-11 03:39:25 EDT
---
Hmm, it seems that the compiled RPM doesn
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-10 16:30:36 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks, noted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-10 14:52:43 EDT
---
Thanks, noted and changed. Added reqs: gc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-10 13:07:19 EDT
---
A koji build has failed:
http://koji.f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-10 12:48:27 EDT
---
Unless I'm mistaken, gcc hasn't used /us
38 matches
Mail list logo
