Re: [Fink-devel] python bsddb bindings

2004-05-12 Thread Frederic Gobry
> I would just depend on db 4.2, since earlier version (4.0, 4.1) had > serious problems on Mac OS X (especially on multiprocessor > machines). thanks for the tip. no known issues with 4.2 I hope ? (I've bad memories of picking a dependency that was just painful to support afterwards) > Look ho

Re: [Fink-devel] python bsddb bindings

2004-05-12 Thread Christian Schaffner
On 12.05.2004, at 13:20, Frederic Gobry wrote: I'd like some advice as a beginner packager... I've written an. info for http://pybsddb.sf.net/ (quite easy, as it uses distutils). Now, the issue is that this package works with any combination of: - Berkeley DB 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 I would just depend on

[Fink-devel] python bsddb bindings

2004-05-12 Thread Frederic Gobry
Hi folks, I'd like some advice as a beginner packager... I've written an. info for http://pybsddb.sf.net/ (quite easy, as it uses distutils). Now, the issue is that this package works with any combination of: - Berkeley DB 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 - Python 2.2 and 2.3 What is the usual policy in that