There is no failure. There is clearly nothing wrong with the boundary
conditions because your boundary conditions are satisfied in both cases.
You're not solving the same problem. charge, electrons, holes, idonors, and
iacceptors are not arbitrary values. They are densities. Printing
holes.cell
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for the insight, having a large project which is still light weight and
transparent is a challenge so I understand that approach.
My interest in the CV approach came about because my 1D FVM code fails when
trying to solve a particular electrostatics problem. I coded up the
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:33 PM, boyfarr...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> When reading through the FiPy docs,
> http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/numerical/discret.html
>
> I noticed that discussion of vertex centred (CV) and cell centred (CC)
> meshes. I'm just curious, why did
Dear list,
When reading through the FiPy docs,
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/numerical/discret.html
I noticed that discussion of vertex centred (CV) and cell centred (CC) meshes.
I'm just curious, why did you decided to implement FiPy with CC approach. Did
you find some advantag
