Dimitry,
A cluster won't help, since all databases would see the same number of
transactions, the number of which is the problem.
Sean
From: Dimitry Sibiryakov [s...@ibphoenix.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 4:29 AM
To: For discussion among Fireb
RETURNING clause does not work on an UPDATE statement with WHERE CURRENT OF ...
---
Key: CORE-3709
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3709
Project: Firebird Core
Hello, Yi!
Saturday, December 24, 2011, 4:37:08 AM, you wrote:
YL> In the past week, we have a few databases from several customers run out of
YL> the 2^31-1 transaction ID limit. After some research I found this problem to
YL> have been around since five years ago. Some suggestions were given su
On 24-12-2011 13:49, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> It looks like the snapshots on the website do no include embedded.
>
> It is included. There is no separate packages for server\embedded.
> All binaries are at single common archive.
Thanks, apparently I looked cross-eyed because I see it now :(
--
> It looks like the snapshots on the website do no include embedded.
It is included. There is no separate packages for server\embedded.
All binaries are at single common archive.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Write once. Port to
It looks like the snapshots on the website do no include embedded. Is
there another location that includes a Win32 embedded build of the 2.5.2
snapshot?
If not, could someone build one for me so I can verify that CORE-3671 is
resolved by this?
--
Mark Rotteveel
---
24.12.2011 1:37, Yi Lu wrote:
> 1.I wonder if anyone now has a proper solution to this issue, without
> requireing shutting down the system.
Set up cluster. While one node is down for maintenance, users can work with
other(s).
--
SY, SD.
--
Is there any documentation available on SRP for driver developers. I
looked over the commit Alex did yesterday and although I think I get the
general gist of it, it would be helpful to have some additional
documentation.
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel
-
