On 09/11/2021 09:15, Roman Simakov wrote:
> вт, 9 нояб. 2021 г. в 14:30, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
> :
>>
>> Currently it's only possible via database triggers making others
>> attachments start they own sessions.
>>
>>
>>> It would be nice to have it implemented.
>>>
>>
>> Agree.
>
> Are you
вт, 9 нояб. 2021 г. в 14:30, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes :
>
> Currently it's only possible via database triggers making others
> attachments start they own sessions.
>
>
> > It would be nice to have it implemented.
> >
>
> Agree.
Are you going to do it?
> Please note I'm refactoring the profile
On 09/11/2021 08:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote 09.11.2021 12:30:
>> Please note I'm refactoring the profiler branch, making it via a plugin.
>
> Why? Do you expect anybody to write a custom profiler?
>
Yes.
Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web inter
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote 09.11.2021 12:30:
Please note I'm refactoring the profiler branch, making it via a plugin.
Why? Do you expect anybody to write a custom profiler?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fir
On 09/11/2021 04:45, Roman Simakov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There are 2 threads: PSQL profiler and SQL profiler. I've decided to
> continue here)
>
> It seems to me that profiling only the same attachment is not as
> useful as it could be.
> Imagine a working application. It's ready but you want to kn
Hello!
There are 2 threads: PSQL profiler and SQL profiler. I've decided to
continue here)
It seems to me that profiling only the same attachment is not as
useful as it could be.
Imagine a working application. It's ready but you want to know where
it spends time. You attach to the server by profi
On 13/11/2020 07:32, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
> Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote Fri, 13 Nov
> 2020 01:33:52 +0300:
>
>> On 08/11/2020 17:58, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote:
>>> Really great feature
>>>
>>> but i am worried about the title „package (FB 5.0)”.
>>>
>>> Is it for FB4 or f
On 13/11/2020 02:05, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>
> The profiler does look like a more complex feature and IMO it deserves
> more attention before being committed. I'm willing to communicate more
> about this, but I also have my own tasks to complete before RC1 thus
> being somewhat limited in time. I
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote Fri, 13 Nov 2020
01:33:52 +0300:
On 08/11/2020 17:58, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote:
Really great feature
but i am worried about the title „package (FB 5.0)”.
Is it for FB4 or for the future version FB5?
I labeled it (and RDB$BLOB_UTIL) for FB 5 (or next v
13.11.2020 01:33, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I labeled it (and RDB$BLOB_UTIL) for FB 5 (or next version after 4) as
For sure it's worth targeting at v4.1, not v5. Minor ODS changes are
allowed in minor releases.
FB 4 was considered frozen for new development, specially for ODS cha
On 08/11/2020 17:58, Karol Bieniaszewski wrote:
> Really great feature
>
> but i am worried about the title „package (FB 5.0)”.
>
> Is it for FB4 or for the future version FB5?
>
I labeled it (and RDB$BLOB_UTIL) for FB 5 (or next version after 4) as
FB 4 was considered frozen for new developmen
Really great feature
but i am worried about the title „package (FB 5.0)”.
Is it for FB4 or for the future version FB5?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo