Worked like a charm. Brilliance...
On Apr 28, 12:01 am, Hudson Akridge wrote:
> Hrm, try something like this:
> Map(x => x.FileData)
> .WithLengthOf(2147483647);
>
> I believe that should be the max size for varbinaries.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Action Jackson wrote:
>
> >
Hrm, try something like this:
Map(x => x.FileData)
.WithLengthOf(2147483647);
I believe that should be the max size for varbinaries.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Action Jackson wrote:
>
> Thanks! Removing the explicit call to CustomSqlTypeIs and adding the
> explicit dialects for eac
Thanks! Removing the explicit call to CustomSqlTypeIs and adding the
explicit dialects for each back end seemed to make the difference.
Thank you very much for your help. Not to be greedy, but would you
happen to know if it's possible to change the default mapping of byte
[] properties for MsSq
>
> are you saying that I should remove the explicit call to "CustomSqlTypeIs"
> and let NHibernate automatically take care of the conditional logic for what
> the Sql type should be?
>
Yup :) This is the exact reason that dialects exist. Dialects are a way to
work with a database consistently, co
Hi Hudson, thank you for the quick response. FileData is a byte
array (byte[]). As for my database configuration, I am using the
SqlLite20Driver and the SQLiteDialect for testing purposes. For your
#1 suggestion, are you saying that I should remove the explicit call
to "CustomSqlTypeIs" and le
1.) What is your FileData? Assuming it's marked as serializable, NHibernate
should default to mapping it to a BLOB or varbinary depending on the dialect
used during configuration. You then set the different dialects during
different initialization routines depending on if you're testing or running
Does anyone know if it is possible to use conditional logic to
construct Fluent mappings? Specifically, I would like to take the
following mapping:
public class MyFileMap : ClassMap
{
public WksFileMap()
{
Id(x => x.Id);
Map(x => x.FileData)
Erm, first of my examples should have been Restrictions.Eq, not .In,
apologies. Reading your question a couple more times, I believe you're
probably leaning towards the second example. Again, check out chapter 12.4
in the NHibernate reference documentation for more details and other methods
of gett
Your question's more of an NHibernate specific question, so you may have
accidentally posted to the fluent group instead. ;) In any event, I'll try
and help however I can here.
First off, what do you mean in terms of an opposite scenario? The
description you've given changes the objects and players
OK. This is a stripped down test case, not the original code. The crux
seems to be the subclassing:
The entities:
namespace FNH_Repro.Entities
{
public class ThingBase : Entity
{
}
public class SpecificThing : ThingBase
{
public virtual ARelatedThing RelatedThing { ge
Your best bet is to just post your Class data definitions (all required for
mapping) and your configuration statements used for any conventions or the
like you used when you configured fluent to automap; all as text.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Kevin Dente wrote:
>
> I have a simple repro c
I have a simple repro case for this (VS project), but I'm not sure how
to post it. Does Google Groups not support attachments?
On Apr 27, 2:12 am, James Gregory wrote:
> Yeah, we need some more info. What's your automapping setup? What does this
> particular entity look like? What's the property
So if I had a ListOfSomething and I want an instance of MyClass whose
SomeProperty value is contained in the ListOfSomething, I would use
var myInstance = (MyClass)session.CreateCriteria(typeof(MyClass))
.Add(Restrictions.In
("SomeProperty", ListOfSometh
Or change the access strategy to field. Ending as:
private int _something;
public virtual ZeeEnum Something {
get { return (ZeeEnum)_something; }
set { _something = (int)value; }
}
On Apr 25, 10:53 pm, Roelof Blom wrote:
> I use the following convention:
>
> public class EnumConvention :
First of all, this is not an urgent issue. It's certainly a "nice-to-
have", not an issue at all. But, I would like some additional
feedback on how others might be solving this "problem".
Below is the original issue submission, followed by a comment on how I
might accomplish what I am looking f
Yeah, we need some more info. What's your automapping setup? What does this
particular entity look like? What's the property in question?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Andrew Stewart wrote:
> Hi Kevin
> I'm not sure why that should of happened, can you give us your
> configuration and your exa
Hi Kevin
I'm not sure why that should of happened, can you give us your configuration
and your example to look at:
Cheers
Andy
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:47 PM, MaggiePlusPlus
wrote:
>
> I am using AutoMap exclusively as well (but am also very new at
> this). I have gotten the Many-to-one mapp
17 matches
Mail list logo