e:
> It depends on your design. If you have a common base class, for
> example, then you could use IgnoreBase, but if you have an actual
> hierarchy then that might be more tricky. What do you have in mind?
>
> On Tuesday, November 3, 2009, Jay Oliver wrote:
>
> > That'
That's probably essentially correct. Is there any way to get the
AutoMapper to do it?
On Nov 3, 8:47 am, James Gregory wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that just be mapping everything using
> a ClassMap?
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Jay Oliver
I believe this used to be possible, and perhaps
was even the default behavior at some point in the past. Is there any
way to still achieve this effect?
On Nov 3, 8:37 am, Jay Oliver wrote:
> I don't have any specific mappings I'm having a problem with handy,
> this is just something
in your mappings then that dictates you want a
> table-per-class-hierarchy, otherwise it defaults to table-per-subclass.
>
> Please show us your mappings.
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jay Oliver wrote:
>
> > This is probably a stupid question, but I've been deep
This is probably a stupid question, but I've been deeply submerged in
a project for a good while now, and haven't been following NH/FNH
progress that closely.
Previously I believe I was able to specify that I wanted every
concrete class mapped to its own table. Now the only options seem to
be tab
appings up so you can run the usual way of
> writing out the mapping files.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jay Oliver wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if I was clear enough. I'm doing something like this:
>
> > var mappings = AutoPersis
nfigure the model then output the mapping,
> personally I don't seem to be able to make it break before the configure is
> called.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Jay Oliver wrote:
>
> > That doesn't seem to be happening for me, but it&#
#x27;m away from the source at the mo, let me know if that doesnt solve your
> problem and I'll boot the source up and have a play
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Jay Oliver wrote:
>
> > I'm playing around with the AutoPer
I'm playing around with the AutoPersistenceModel, and I like it a good
deal.
I've been doing a lot of tweaking conventions to try to get it just
right, and keep running into the same problem: When a mapping is
produced that NHibernate doesn't like, I have no way to see the XML of
that mapping.
I
I noticed that the ConnectedTester.MappingTest1 test was failing
because the location property wasn't included in the mapping. I
uploaded a patch to fix this to the group's file section.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
It's currently part of NHContrib, but hasn't been updated to work
against 2.0 GA yet. I'm not sure if/when this will happen.
I believe the intention is NH.Linq to become part of the official
distribution for the 2.1 release, but I'm not sure when that will be
happening.
On Aug 26, 10:57 am, Deri
11 matches
Mail list logo
