[fluent-nhib] Re: Table name when automapping a collection of simple types

Great, thanks. I've also thought about the problem with broken backwards compatibility. I don't know how hard it would be to make the name of the subtable configurable? At least those (hopefully few) who rely on the old behaviour had someway of going back. It would still be a breaking change,

[fluent-nhib] Re: Table name when automapping a collection of simple types

No one got any input on this? Is it just me being dense? ;-) -- Martin On Wednesday, February 2, 2011 3:21:06 PM UTC+1, Martin Larsen wrote: > > Hi there. > > I'm using the automapper to map a collection of strings. The mapping is > working, but I'm wondering ab

[fluent-nhib] Table name when automapping a collection of simple types

Hi there. I'm using the automapper to map a collection of strings. The mapping is working, but I'm wondering about the table name of the generated table. The table is named the same as the property in the class, so having public IList Foo { get; set; } generates a table in the database named "