c TypeBClassMap() {
>
> HasMany(x=>x.Children);
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hudson Akridge
> Sent: 04 January 2010 16:43
> To: fluent-nhibernate@go
HasMany(x=>x.Children);
}
}
From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
[mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hudson Akridge
Sent: 04 January 2010 16:43
To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [fluent-nhib] Re: Discriminating sub classes with null
values
While you can *technically* do what you're looking for with a formula
discriminator, that is, in my book, a horrid hack and like any "good" hack,
will cause you unforseen problems down the road.
What Paul is recommending is more of a state based function, and would be a
better solution imo. Inheri
Thanks for responding Paul.
I'm not sure I fully understand your response or whether I've phrased
my question wrong. I see what you mean about not wanting to have
objects in an invalid state at runtime, however wouldn't that always
be the case for when you use DiscriminateSubClassesOnColumn? i.e
