Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-26 Thread Chris Bowditch
Glen Mazza wrote: Thanks for taking the time to explain Glen. What youve said is mostly as I understood it. Some comments below. The FOUserAgent is ultra-easy (?) to access from the FOP Application, but not-so-easy (and, also, not-so-relevant) for the PDFTranscoder. (We also have an SVGUserAg

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-26 Thread Glen Mazza
Chris, Certain packages of our project--in this case, the "image" package--are used both by the PDFTranscoder (a separate application, if you will) and the FOP application. The FOUserAgent is ultra-easy (?) to access from the FOP Application, but not-so-easy (and, also, not-so-relevant) for the

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-26 Thread Chris Bowditch
Glen Mazza wrote: I tried to do a complete switch from FOUserAgent to logger in the images package, was not able to (there are still other cases the FOUserAgent is actually being used.) Glen - I havent looked at this in detail, but my understanding of the FOUserAgent was the place holder for any

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-25 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well I think it is probably bad ignore the > things it is setup to log. Does the logging > stuff have a sort of default 'err' Console logger? > You could have it use that if the one passed in is > 'null'. > We don't have that yet--also, ther

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-25 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Glen Mazza wrote: (Resending to FOP-DEV list...) Please take a look at my most recent changes today--comments welcome. In short, for the images package, as well as for transcoder work, I don't care much about the UA anymore. I switched the signatures in question to just request a logger inste

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-25 Thread Glen Mazza
(Resending to FOP-DEV list...) Please take a look at my most recent changes today--comments welcome. In short, for the images package, as well as for transcoder work, I don't care much about the UA anymore. I switched the signatures in question to just request a logger instead, because that is

Re: PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-22 Thread Glen Mazza
Applied, thanks! Glen --- Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've attached a patch for the PDF Transcoder > that Batik > uses. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/s

PDF Transcoder patch

2004-01-22 Thread Thomas DeWeese
Hi all, I've attached a patch for the PDF Transcoder that Batik uses. There are three basic parts to the patch. The first gives each image added to the PDFGraphics2D a unique key. Without this the PDF ends up referencing the same image for each Jpeg added (this is the changes to PDFGraphics2D