Re: [Patch] PR fortran/100154 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

Hi Harald, It looks good to me! Keep clear of 11-branch until release but OK for the others. Thanks Paul On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 00:18, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: > Now with the correct patch attached ... > > Sorry for the confusion! > > --- > > Dear Fortranners, > > we need to check th

[Patch] PR fortran/100154 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

Now with the correct patch attached ... Sorry for the confusion! --- Dear Fortranners, we need to check the arguments to the affected GNU intrinsic extensions properly, and - as pointed out in the PR by Tobias - we need to allow function references that have a data pointer result. Also the arg

[Patch] PR fortran/100154 - [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131

Dear Fortranners, we need to check the arguments to the affected GNU intrinsic extensions properly, and - as pointed out in the PR by Tobias - we need to allow function references that have a data pointer result. Also the argument names of the character arguments of the subroutine versions needed