I've notified the WMF legal department.
Ryan Kaldari
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:49 AM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
> John Vandenberg, 06/03/2012 10:23:
>> The problem isnt that they are providing ebooks, but
>>
>> 1. they are "By Wikimedia Foundatio
itles are kind of silly, but whatever.
Ryan Kaldari
On 1/31/12 8:17 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Hi.
Erik took on the temporary title "VP of Engineering and Product Development"
after Danese left.[1] Just recently it was codified on wmfwiki.[2]
I don't really think much of job titles an
opriate.[1] It is certainly possible to discuss technical
issues surrounding Commons without using porny presentations.[2]
1. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAMcamp_DC/Friendly_space_policy
2. http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Porny_presentation
Ryan Kaldari
_
galleries that disagree with our PD-Art
policy, I think that disagreement is an exception rather than the rule
when it comes to copyright issues.
Ryan Kaldari
On 1/13/12 8:24 AM, Dominic McDevitt-Parks wrote:
> On 13 January 2012 09:45, Liam Wyatt wrote:
>
>> On 13 January 2012 14
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011
Start at the bottom.
Ryan Kaldari
On 1/3/12 4:44 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Thomas Daltonwrote:
>
>> On 3 January 2012 22:36, Theo10011 wrote:
>>> WMF started the email campaign last year f
user tracking.
* Stability - If a 3rd party service goes down, we have no control over
getting it fixed in a timely manner. This is one of the reason we don't
use ReCaptcha for our login captcha.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/16/11 1:57 PM, Strainu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the foundation eve
ther, less-dramatic approaches in the meantime.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/14/11 4:06 PM, Kim Bruning wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:57:51PM +, Fae wrote:
>> On 14 December 2011 22:42, Kim Bruning wrote:
>>
>> No. My opinion was on the straw man as stated, not for some later
ersonally think it makes more sense to stick with
the unported CC-BY-SA license for now. The idea of having a ported Terms of
Use, however, might be more doable, but I'd like to hear the legal team's
opinion on this as they probably have a much better idea of what that would
entail (and if
by moral rights. I imagine the
reasoning behind this is that such works entail a minimum degree of
creative "authorship" and are often published without attribution. If
I'm mistaken in this conclusion, please let me know.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/13/11 7:56 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wr
of attribution are acceptable for satisfying moral rights?
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
tantly, rather than
carving out exceptions for various cases and having inconsistencies
between what we require on paper and what we actually expect from reusers.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
I suppose we could add a disclaimer saying that the Terms of Use do not
affect the editor's moral rights, although this would be a bit redundant
since the CC-BY-SA license already states this.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/12/11 12:42 PM, Maggie Dennis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM,
That's the whole point of free licenses—you're giving up some of your
rights to your work. This doesn't have anything to do with European vs.
American copyright law.
I checked the wording in the existing terms of service and it's exactly
the same.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/1
I forgot humiliate. Sorry.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/12/11 8:14 AM, Teofilo wrote:
> Le 11 décembre 2011 19:02, MZMcBride a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> The "Terms of use" rewrite is starting to wind down. The current draft is
>> here:<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/
for those licenses. I don't see anything about how we're
supposed to belittle and disgrace Europeans, but maybe I missed that part :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/12/11 8:14 AM, Teofilo wrote:
> Le 11 décembre 2011 19:02, MZMcBride a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> The "Terms of use&
Wow, this thread went from interesting to pointless bickering in record
time.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/4/11 11:47 AM, Alasdair wrote:
> You can see all my contributions to en.wikipedia at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ajbp or get an overview at
> http://tools
imple
questions or comments).
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/31/11 6:54 AM, Nathan wrote:
> I see Brandon replied to this thread several times; did anyone notice
> if the question in the OP (if community consensus is required for
> implementation, where was it demonstrated for en.wp
r those of you who hate pink hearts, just add the following to
your vector.css:
#ca-wikilove.icon a{
background-image:
url("/w/extensions/WikiLove/modules/ext.wikiLove/images/heart-icons-black.png");
}
(or turn WikiLove off in your user prefs).
Cheers,
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/28/11 3:27
I just built WikiLove to make giving barnstars easier. The WFM didn't
invent giving barnstars, that tradition was created by the community.
Since it's been going on for quite a few years, I think your complaint
is a bit late.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/28/11 3:00 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> The
The WMF isn't allowed to lobby for or against legislation, per our 501c3
non-profit status in the US. This is not necessarily true for chapters
though, and definitely not true for the communities.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/4/11 4:33 PM, Thomas Goldammer wrote:
> 2011/10/5 John Vandenberg:
&g
t maintain a good relationship with the Israeli
museum, it may not be a good idea to mass upload them to Commons.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On 10/3/11 4:36 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>> I think we are fairly safe hosting the images of the original fragments,
>> even by Israeli law. Israel does not recognize "sweat of the brow" and
>> requires a m
copyright holders of such a transcription.
Ryan Kaldari
1. Tempska, Urzula (2002). "'Originality' After the Dead Sea Scrolls
Decision: Implications for the American Law of Copyright". /Marquette
Intellectual Property Law Review/ *6* (1): 132.
2. Elkin-Koren, Niva (20
ting controversial content in appropriate contexts.
Thus I am routinely accused of supporting censorship (despite the fact
that I founded WikiProject Wikipedians Against Censorship!).
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/29/11 4:34 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 30 September 2011 00:28, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>
&g
-formed and
> that they should therefore be ignored.
Well, when every thoughtful comment you have on a topic is met with
nothing more than chants of "WP:NOTCENSORED!", the tone argument seems
quite valid.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundat
Wow, it looks like I may be wrong. Very good news from Australia! Thanks
for the link.
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/27/11 11:57 AM, Stephen Bain wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>> (Australia, however, is still decidedly sweat
>> based).
> Well, we recen
nalysis of the Notion of Originality in Copyright Law". /Journal of the
Copyright Society of the U.S.A./ *49*: 949--981.
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/26/11 3:39 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>> On 09/26/11 12:27 PM, emijrp wrote:
>>> I
Since when is the German Wikipedia under the domain of German
jurisdiction? The German Wikipedia is an international project hosted in
the United States. Am I missing something here?
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/16/11 3:48 AM, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
> That is an legal issue. We do that to comply with
His en.wiki article is pretty lackluster:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_S._Hart
and the other language versions don't look any better.
Anyone want to help improve them?
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/8/11 1:10 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From
fact
that the category "People using vacuum cleaners" on Commons at one time
included nothing but photos of nude women using vacuum cleaners.
Technically, it was correct categorization, but it was certainly
astonishing.
Ryan Kaldari
On 8/17/11 7:45 AM, Nathan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17
Can you guys please take this discussion off-list? Thanks.
Ryan Kaldari
On 8/17/11 9:55 AM, Wjhonson wrote:
> Robin there are no laws (in the US) about plagiarism, that's what I'm saying.
> None. Zero. They don't exist.
> Why? Because plagiarism does not de facto create
Ha, sorry I missed the joke! I had no idea what emesis referred to.
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/28/11 7:41 AM, M. Williamson wrote:
> Ryan, perhaps you missed the intention of my e-mail. The sentence about
> "emesis" was also clearly not serious. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/emesis
&g
So if I post nothing but emails about "the cabal" and random insults to
people trying to have legitimate discussions, it's cool as long as I end
my emails with a serious sentence???
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/27/11 4:53 PM, M. Williamson wrote:
> Yes, Elizabeth is clearly not a tro
Unless you go by the name Elizabeth or whothis, I don't believe I
mentioned you in my email. Apologies if there was any confusion. My
request is specifically regarding the email address whoth...@gmail.com,
and no one else.
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/27/11 4:18 PM, Raul Gutierrez wrote:
> D
Regardless, Elizabeth/Anon/whothis is clearly trolling the list and
being disruptive. I would like to request moderation of his/her comments.
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/27/11 2:45 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, M. Williamson wrote:
>> Nathan, I think that Raul Gutierr
y of which
were outright false). Does this sound like:
1. someone who wants to contribute to a constructive dialog
2. someone with an axe to grind
I'll give you 3 guesses, no 2.
[1]
http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-Link-Building/Thirty-news-site-comments-with.html
Rya
can be
recopyrighted, it puts a chilling effect on reuse.
4. By setting the precedent that public domain works can be
recopyrighted, it is likely that more works will be recopyrighted in the
future, and the public will be further robbed of our shared culture (and
legal property).
Ryan Kaldari
It's based on the template transclusion count here:
http://toolserver.org/~jarry/templatecount/index.php?lang=commons&name=Template%3APD-Layout#bottom
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/23/11 1:01 PM, teun spaans wrote:
> The number of 3 million surpises me. Common hosts about 10 million item
.
Obviously we have a lot of work to do to reform U.S. copyright law (rule
of the shorter term, freedom of panorama, etc.), but it would be nice if
we don't actually shrink our public domain in the meantime.
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/23/11 12:02 PM, geni wrote:
> On 23 June 2011 19:38, David Gerar
of Henrik Gronvold, the writings of Leon Trotsky,
etc.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
hat are
clearly problematic. Especially since in many of these cases, the most
damning information is sensitive and cannot be shared publicly.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikime
Is there anyone active on Wikiversity that hasn't been banned from every
other project? It seems to be turning into a regular Mos Eisley cantina.
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/3/11 8:40 AM, Newyorkbrad wrote:
> In view of the entire history of this matter, not all of which should
> necessarily b
We already have a policy covering data preservation and recovery under
any foreseeable disaster scenarios:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TERMINAL
;)
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/2/11 4:44 PM, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:11, Neil Harris wrote:
>> Tape is -- still -- your fr
Sorry, change everywhere I said "50" to "60". I can't keep this stuff
straight :P
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> It's actually even worse than that. Due to the URAA, thousands of works
> which are verifiably public domain in India ha
might get deleted.
Welcome to the insanity of U.S. copyright laws and treaties!
Ryan Kaldari
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> 2011/5/10 FT2 :
> > Why would the creator's citizenship, or the place of its creation, be
> > decisive? The works of an Indian
Actually, what we should be doing is asking Afilias for one of the reserved
1-letter domains: w.org. Twitter has t.co, so why not?
Ryan Kaldari
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Just create your own tld ;)
>
>
>
> ___
om places like Brazil and
Mozambique instead of just the United States and Texas.
Now that I think about it, I believe it would actually be a pretty
awesome website. Too bad we'll never let that happen.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
fo
n the extension for Meta (other than
the Bugzilla bug)? Are there any blocking issues that would prevent this
from being feasible? I'm also interested in improving the translation
system for CentralNotice, so maybe the Translation extension could help.
Ryan Kaldari
On 3/23/11 10:53
x27;. You say that you aren't suggesting that
people not link to English Wikipedia, but then what is the point of your
argument? Are you suggesting that we pre-translate every linked article
into all 269 languages and then protect them all as well? Obviou
Yes, the larger wikis need to become WikiProject-centric. First step in
doing this would be to create a WikiProject namespace. Second step would
be to make WikiProject article tagging/assessment part of the software
instead of template-based.
Ryan Kaldari
On 2/25/11 3:11 PM, John Vandenberg
mp;dim2=CommunityHQ>.
* Be a pro. Find out if you're really as good as you think you are.
Check out the Top Contributors Hall of Fame
<http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Special:Tops&src=email&dim1=First5&dim2=TopContribs>.
We're glad you're part of t
proprietary cultural bias" has gone seriously haywire :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/20/10 4:16 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 19/11/2010 21:31, Risker wrote:
>>
>>> The last one is for the fiscal yea
basic expectations of privacy in order to work at the WMF would likely
scare away most potential employees, especially since WMF employees work
at below market rates.
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/19/10 3:37 PM, Noein wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 19/11/2010 1
] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_Integrity_Act
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-drop_rule
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/17/10 2:18 PM, Strainu wrote:
> 2010/11/17:
>
>> In a message dated 11/17/2010 1:23:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>> steven.wall...@gmail.com writes:
>>
>>
>&
imply that the Foundation's favor can be
bought and sold (without any evidence to that effect), I don't see why
we should just accept that. I agree there are more important points to
discuss, so I'm dropping the issue, but I still reserve the right to
question any spurious accusations i
her of
my questions, I'll assume you have no evidence for these aspersions.
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/15/10 4:55 PM, Robert S. Horning wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 12:10 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/10 3:26 PM, Robert S. Horning wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The differ
gt;
Do you have any evidence that PediaPress offered the Foundation money up
front for consideration as a partner? If so, how much money did they
give? This is a very serious accusation that requires some evidence in
my opinion, especially as it is contradicted by what Erik says
cision (especially considering how skeptical they've
been of the PediaPress partnership).
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
What's the URL for Robert's service? I would love to try it out. If the
service isn't mature yet, is there a code repository somewhere?
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/13/10 10:00 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 13 November 2010 17:53, Magnus Manske wrote:
>
>
>> I'm all
more of the search results (which is already true in some obscure
cases). Perhaps Wikipedia will inadvertently cause the demise of Amazon
and the rebirth of local bookstores.
Ryan Kaldari
On 11/1/10 1:09 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> It is actually becoming somewhat difficult to search for
publishers so that we can start asking for some
royalties (or else sue them for not giving us proper credit).
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/31/10 9:41 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> There is a book review of a 98 page book supposedly about Ukita
> Kōkichi (who apparently prematurely invented the hang
The CentralNotice pages/js use client-side caching, so not ever page
view will actually spawn a new request to the squid servers.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/22/10 4:00 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
> On 22 Oct 2010, at 02:02, Erik Zachte wrote:
>
>
>> A quick update on our inflated
rly has an axe
to grind and intends to grind it. We don't have to facilitate that.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/22/10 2:04 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> Yes, but he is relentless when not prodded. Unless we chose to open up
> Wikipedia to paid editing of the sort he does he will probably contin
I thought it was 3 or 5 out of nine (depending on your definition of
community).
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/20/10 3:44 PM, Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
> Can you explain your statement more? Since only one or three seats are
> selected
> by the community out of nine(depending on your defi
In the U.S. that would be "home electronics".
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/20/10 11:40 AM, Leonardo Oña wrote:
> Ok, thanks you.
> Te Category Electrodomestics include: Microwaves, radios, TV, PC, etc.
>
> 2010/10/20
>
>
>> In a message dated 10/20/2010 11:30:49 AM
te on a budget of $1.6 million including
salaries for several IT developers". (The current hosting cost is $2
million, not including salaries.)
Anyway, this probably constitutes feeding the trolls, so -1 for me.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/19/10 11:06 AM, Mike Dupont wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:5
This may be related to the deployment of the new CentralNotice banner
loader. An RT ticket has been opened to investigate. If so, we may need
to filter those requests from the page view stats.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/18/10 6:16 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
> For those of you who want to follow t
uncritical discussion of WMF
50% sharp criticism
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/18/10 11:56 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> Funny how Peter's blog complaining about moderation is itself moderated
>> by Peter.
>>
>> Ryan Kaldari
>>
> That is not significant. The kind of stuf
Funny how Peter's blog complaining about moderation is itself moderated
by Peter.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/18/10 9:37 AM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> Peter Damian, it turns out has a blog, "Beyond Necessity" and has
> commented on our banning and moderating activities:
>
> http:/
Good thing he included a non-disclosure clause on his very public job
posting :P
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/15/10 4:17 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> At
> http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-Link-Building/Thirty-news-site-comments-with.html
>
> "Status: Open
>
I thought you were awarding the post a score of 0 :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/14/10 3:05 PM, Nathan wrote:
> That was awkward!
>
> Meant to be:
>
> On a day in 2005, my hair was too long and not well kept.
>
> On a day in 2010, it was again too long and not well kept.
>
> Ob
Sorry, I meant every audio recording of an article, not every sound file :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/9/10 10:23 AM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> So you're saying that the community is complicit in the agenda against
> itself? I guess we should just go back to the days when you had to
> reco
n the License Update
Committee (which was mainly comprised of community members, not
Foundation employees).
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/8/10 10:19 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> 2010/9/7, Teofilo:
>
>> 2010/9/7, Tim Starling:
>>
>>
>>> Presumably this conspiracy would have to e
Internet Archive. Anyone with access to the databases should be able to
do this fairly easily. Rather than trying to engineer a complicated
system that will take a year to implement, why not take this simple
approach that will take care of 90+% of the problem?
Ryan Kaldari
Apparently long-time Wikimedia contributors are also far more sensitive
to Foundation imposition of /less/ visual clutter as well, judging by
the reaction to the Vector rollout. Perhaps we could just say that
long-term Wikimedia contributors are just more sensitive ;)
Ryan Kaldari
On 8/2/10 5
I should make the disclaimer that all of my opinions expressed on this
list are as a community member rather than a WMF employee. I have no
official involvement in the current study or any decision making power
thereof. I just code donation banners :)
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/26/10 2:14 PM, Ryan
ring technology. I think we're pretty far away from the
edge of the "slippery slope", but if that changes, I'll be right there
with you defending the integrity of the project.
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/26/10 12:39 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 26 July 2010 20:08, Ryan Kaldari wrot
(if implemented
correctly) is actually a good thing for those of us who want to keep
Wikipedia uncensored. By letting people adapt Wikipedia to their own
particular uses, they don't have to impose their POV on the rest of us.
Ryan Kaldari
___
found
On 7/23/10 3:52 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> Meta-question -
>
> Is there in fact sufficient evidence that this is a topic that the
> Foundation must, or should, engage in actively at this time?
That seems to be one of the questions that Robert Harris is trying to
answer.
don't work and encourage less
> cluefulness, not more cluefulness.
>
I'm not saying "don't be stupid". I'm suggesting some specific (but
flexible) guidelines we can point to for those editors who have
demonstrated a lack of cluefulness.
Ryan Kaldari
_
nerally do not provide adequate context for such images."
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/22/10 1:57 PM, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
>> R M Harris
>> .. but the time has come, I think, to actively begin a discussion
>> within the communities about some of the questions which I've
>>
discussion concerning it could be had
at the TfD page. Would nominating it for deletion be a good idea or a
bad idea? Are there any alternatives that make sense in this situation?
Ryan Kaldari
On 7/16/10 8:41 AM, Austin Hair wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>
Here's Lessig's response to the ASCAP smear campaign:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-lessig/ascaps-attack-on-creative_b_641965.html
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscr
the money so that Warner Brothers could be
properly paid and wouldn't have to resort to begging for change on the
street corner.
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/25/10 4:18 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 6/25/2010 3:55:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> 17pet...@cardinalmail.cua
Exactly how does Creative Commons steal music lyrics? I'm not following you.
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/25/10 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Peters wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> I'm going to donate to their cause.
>
> Music lyrics, just like poems and novels, should not be stolen and published
&g
ly "The Bell Curve". Anyway, I don't want to
drag this thread into a debate on scientific -isms. I just wanted to
remind everyone that there are real steps that can be taken to address
the gender imbalance problem, regardless of any real or perceived gender
differences.
Ryan Kald
ing out to more women directly. It would be great if the
Foundation's new public policy initiative could do outreach to some
Women's Studies programs or if we could promote Wikipedia to women's
tech groups like IBM Women in Technology or the Anita Borg Institute for
Women and Technol
Corrected.
Ryan Kaldari
On 6/7/10 12:02 PM, geni wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 19:21, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>
>> I've added a new section on DMCA compliance to both the en.wiki and meta
>> Office actions pages:
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Office_actions
&g
I've added a new section on DMCA compliance to both the en.wiki and meta
Office actions pages:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Office_actions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Office_actions
Please feel free to augment with additional info.
Ryan Ka
e non-liable) host and as legal council for one of the parties.
John's suggestion is good advice - seek legal council from among the
community. In the meantime, I'll try to put together a quick guide for
filing counter-notices with the Foundation when I get some fr
olved only bogus threats, not a legally binding takedown notice.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
ct of New York, for example. Granted, several federal
courts have followed that ruling since then.
Ryan Kaldari
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Dan Rosenthal wrote:
>> The 10th circuit (or the US District Court for Colorado, which
>> actually made the decisio
Yes, but how many of them let you opt out? If we could opt out of the
Great Firewall of China, I imagine we would :)
Ryan Kaldari
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:58 PM, geni wrote:
> 2009/4/1 David Gerard :
>> http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/03/22/open-letter-call-for-major-websites-to-o
On a serious note, however, I would say HELL YES.
Ryan Kaldari
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> At this point I would suggest that we go ahead and block access to
> Wikipedia from the UK entirely. Wikipedia isn't compatible with their
> censorship, libel,
At this point I would suggest that we go ahead and block access to
Wikipedia from the UK entirely. Wikipedia isn't compatible with their
censorship, libel, copyright, or privacy policies.
Ryan Kaldari
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.openrightsgroup.org
Maybe we could use that $20,000 that Philip Greenspun donated back in
2007 to purchase the Encarta illustrations (since it doesn't appear
that that money is ever going to be used otherwise).
Ryan Kaldari
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Domas Mituzas wrote:
>> Tomorrow i
re on the English Wikipedia...
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> 2009/3/30 Ryan Kaldari
>
>> If a museum or archive asserts copyright on a PD work or art, we
>> ignore such claims. The WMF has stated they are willing to go to court
>> to defend the public domain s
/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#The_position_of_the_WMF
Ryan Kaldari
> I'm still puzzled on what is the right thing to do with
>
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/File:Shakespeare.jpg
>
> which was deleted twice and then reuploaded.
>
> When a museum claims to own copyright
> "either by, at your choice, including"
"at your choice" is unnecessarily verbose. The sentence has the same
meaning without the extra clause.
Ryan Kaldari
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia
way, this survey would be a pretty poor way to attempt
it.
Ryan Kaldari
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Nathan wrote:
> As a non-statistician (and, from this list, you'd think there are lots of
> professional statisticians participating...), can one of the experts explain
> the p
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
