Am 30.11.2010 09:04, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
>>>
>>> Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
>>> did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
>>> differently (FPC: defaultformatset
Am 30.11.2010 09:59, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
30.11.2010 15:52, Sven Barth wrote:
What about just using "sealed objects" for this in mode Delphi (maybe
change record in that mode to mean "sealed object" by default)? I don't
know how much sense that makes, but as both reside on the stack and both
ca
30.11.2010 15:52, Sven Barth wrote:
What about just using "sealed objects" for this in mode Delphi (maybe
change record in that mode to mean "sealed object" by default)? I don't
know how much sense that makes, but as both reside on the stack and both
can contain methods (I'm talking about the ext
Am 30.11.2010 09:02, schrieb Thaddy:
On 29-11-2010 20:31, Sven Barth wrote:
You are aware that I'm talking about "object" (the old TP style OOP)
not "class" (the Delphi style OOP)? "object" is deprecated in Delphi
since I don't know how long, but in FPC it's still maintained and even
extended.
Am 30.11.2010 03:30, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
30.11.2010 1:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
Time to implement this kind of records in FPC?
I tried once but failed because of big changes they require.
What about just using "se
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> > Then the only question is if we should deprecate defaultformatsettings. I
> > decided to not do this today. Even if we do this, a lot of parameters for
> > the overloaded "formatsettings" routines need to be renamed (to
> > aformatsetti
Am 30.11.2010 03:27, schrieb Paul Ishenin:
30.11.2010 2:31, Sven Barth wrote:
You are aware that I'm talking about "object" (the old TP style OOP) not
"class" (the Delphi style OOP)? "object" is deprecated in Delphi since I
don't know how long, but in FPC it's still maintained and even extended.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> >
> > Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
> > did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
> > differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
>
> Oh well, this is
On 29-11-2010 20:31, Sven Barth wrote:
You are aware that I'm talking about "object" (the old TP style OOP)
not "class" (the Delphi style OOP)? "object" is deprecated in Delphi
since I don't know how long, but in FPC it's still maintained and even
extended.
But what do you mean with "elegan
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
> 30.11.2010 1:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
>
> Time to implement this kind of records in FPC?
If generics are more mature, we are going to need it.
E.g. I'm thinking of par
30.11.2010 1:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
Time to implement this kind of records in FPC?
I tried once but failed because of big changes they require.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
__
30.11.2010 2:31, Sven Barth wrote:
You are aware that I'm talking about "object" (the old TP style OOP) not
"class" (the Delphi style OOP)? "object" is deprecated in Delphi since I
don't know how long, but in FPC it's still maintained and even extended.
In delphi it is still maintained and even
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Oh well, this is an easy one, for
On 29.11.2010 19:55, Thaddy wrote:
On 29-11-2010 19:33, Sven Barth wrote:
Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
"sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems mentioned some time ago would
be gone with simple object
On 29-11-2010 19:33, Sven Barth wrote:
Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
"sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems mentioned some time ago would
be gone with simple objects-simulating-delphi-records-with-
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
>
> > Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
>
> Just thinking: wouldn't objects in FPC achieve the same as
> records-with-methods in Delphi? If objects would be extended with
> "sealed" even the "sudden vmt" problems men
On 29.11.2010 19:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Sigh... always the same -.-
Like
Seems Delphi XE has deprecated all separate variables, and after ten years
did the same as FPC, use an absolute trick. And of course they named it
differently (FPC: defaultformatsettings Delphi: formatsettings)
Like anything new in Delphi nowadays, it is a record-with-some-helpers
___
19 matches
Mail list logo
