Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: >> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this >> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ >> >>

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: > > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this > > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ > > Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough. >

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following: > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this > affects ports/misc/compat8x/ Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough. There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x. CO

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread George Kontostanos
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote: > George Kontostanos schreef: > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon  wrote: >>> >>> on 13/01/2012 11:59 Doug Barton said the following: On 01/13/2012 01:52, George Kontostanos wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/01/2012 12:19 Doug Barton said the following: > On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no >> kernel incompatible changes were introduced? > > Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can > chan

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no > kernel incompatible changes were introduced? Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch. Doug --

Re: FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-13 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
George Kontostanos wrote: Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port rebuild. The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28

FreeBSD 9 & recompile ports

2012-01-12 Thread George Kontostanos
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting! There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9 and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port rebuild. The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28831 Frankly, I am also conf