Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-18 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:26:11 -0400 Christopher Sean Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the enlightenment. My understanding is that Squid can do > both forward and reverse proxy. At least it it would seem so since > that's the way I'm using it. I did not know that varnish cannot be

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Daniel Bye wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:34:04PM +, Pollywog wrote: On Monday 17 March 2008 19:17:58 Wojciech Puchar wrote: i would say it's absolutely needed. anyway - any reason to not use soft updates on every filesystem? What exactly is a soft upda

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Daniel Bye
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 07:34:04PM +, Pollywog wrote: > On Monday 17 March 2008 19:17:58 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I > > > wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache > > > partition

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Pollywog
On Monday 17 March 2008 19:17:58 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Hello > > > > I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I > > wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache > > partition ? > > i would say it's absolutely needed. > > anyway - any reason to n

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Hello I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache partition ? i would say it's absolutely needed. anyway - any reason to not use soft updates on every filesystem? __

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote: Squid is a forward proxy whereas varnish is just a reverse proxy So you can not use it for for lan to wan proxy! Thanks for the enlightenment. My understanding is that Squid can do both forward and reverse proxy. At least it it would see

RE: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Johan Hendriks
Bonnet Onderwerp: Re: Does softupdate help squid ? On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I > wonder > if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache > partition ? >

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Hello I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache partition ? I can't imagine that it would hurt. Last I looked though squid may not be the be

Re: Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread RW
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:51:58 +0100 Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I > wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache > partition ? Yes, use soft-updates. And you should mount any dedicate

Does softupdate help squid ?

2008-03-17 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hello I'm setting up a squid cache (3.0.2) machine FreeBSD 7.0 based and I wonder if softupdates could help (make it faster ) or not the cache partition ? Thanks a lot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list