Re: The 11.1-RC3 can only boot and attach disks in "Safe mode", otherwise gets stuck attaching

2017-07-17 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:01:16AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > Upgrading 11.0-RELEASE-p11 to 11.1-RC3 using the usual freebsd-update > upgrade > method I ended up with a system which gets stuck while trying to attach > the second set of disks. This happened already after the first phase of > the

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Vlad K.
On 2017-07-18 00:09, Mark Millard wrote: (Although I expect Konstantin Belousov's note here is the first public description of the problem's details.) Thanks for explaining the problem. I guess this was the reason why I failed to parse kib's reply, this was the first bit of info I encountered

The 11.1-RC3 can only boot and attach disks in "Safe mode", otherwise gets stuck attaching

2017-07-17 Thread Mark Martinec
Upgrading 11.0-RELEASE-p11 to 11.1-RC3 using the usual freebsd-update upgrade method I ended up with a system which gets stuck while trying to attach the second set of disks. This happened already after the first phase of the upgrade procedure (installing and re-booting with a new kernel). The f

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Mark Millard
Vlad K. vlad-fbsd at acheronmedia.com wrote on Mon Jul 17 15:03:11 UTC 2017 : > I also asked why wasn't the bsdinstall-er option change > MFC'd after 1 day, two weeks ago, whether it's by omission, simply > ENOTIME, or something else... Given what Konstantin Belousov described (default stack sp

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Vlad K.
On 2017-07-17 16:11, Glen Barber wrote: kib gave feedback on this in an earlier reply (which I missed before replying myself). Neither of which answered my questions, I'm sorry. My question was not about stack sizes in 32 or 64 bit installations, nor about the quality of the fix (if I parse

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:47:08PM +0200, Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-07-17 15:33, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > No, this is not available in the 11.1 installer. > > > > Thanks but that's why I asked why's that. r320674 said MFC after 1 day. Is > it too late for 11.1-RELEASE, so it'll be applied to 11

Oracle SCM users list.

2017-07-17 Thread fiona . jackson
    Hi,   We have updated our Oracle SCM users list and thought you would be interested in receiving fresh and accurate contacts for your marketing campaign. We provide data across the globe so you can target your audience and reach to a wider market and increase your lead flow.   We can filt

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Vlad K.
On 2017-07-17 15:33, Glen Barber wrote: No, this is not available in the 11.1 installer. Glen Thanks but that's why I asked why's that. r320674 said MFC after 1 day. Is it too late for 11.1-RELEASE, so it'll be applied to 11-STABLE, or is there another reason? If its' too late, does that

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Glen Barber
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Vlad K. wrote: > Hello list, > > the stack_guard hardening option in bsdinstall is now setting 512 pages of > it in CURRENT, as of r320674. It's said to MFC after 1 day (on Jul 5th), but > STABLE hasn't got it yet. Is this simply an omission (understandabl

Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Vlad K. wrote: > Hello list, > > the stack_guard hardening option in bsdinstall is now setting 512 pages > of it in CURRENT, as of r320674. It's said to MFC after 1 day (on Jul > 5th), but STABLE hasn't got it yet. Is this simply an omission > (understa

stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1

2017-07-17 Thread Vlad K.
Hello list, the stack_guard hardening option in bsdinstall is now setting 512 pages of it in CURRENT, as of r320674. It's said to MFC after 1 day (on Jul 5th), but STABLE hasn't got it yet. Is this simply an omission (understandable as the RELEASE is being prepared so things are a bit hectic