Yes I know that freeradius doesn't know whether we are charging $ 1 or 2.
But the purpose of asking question was that If a user has 3 hrs left @ $1/hr
and after an hour the rate changes to 0.5/hr then technically freeradius
should reply Session-Timeout = 5hrs as (1hr @ $1/hr + 4hrs @ $0.5/hr). So
m
i Think freeradius doesn't know if you charge for 1$ or 2$, it just
counting the time usage.
it should be with your application task to do so..
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:47 +0500, Saeed Akhtar wrote:
> 0.5/hr from 1200 t
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users
>#query = "SELECT SUM(OctetTotal) FROM thismonthsusage WHERE
>UsernameView='%{%k}'"
>}
>
..
>As soon as a new month rolls over there are NO accounting entries for that
>user for that month, hence no record and freeradius denies user as he hasn't
>got any entries, any body know how I should modify t
Le 02.12.2008 10:25, Marcel Grandemange a écrit :
>> Its for Time. I want count on bytes used. and one other problem, its return
>>
> value is Session-Timeout. It represents >remaining time not remaining bytes.
> any clue which attribute will tell remaining bytes???
>
This attribute is N
Good Day.
Im wondering is someone could assist me here.
I currently have freeradius setup and working somewhat.
However I have following setup:
sqlcounter monthlytraffic {
counter-name = Monthly-Traffic
check-name = Max-Monthly-Traffic
reply-na
>Its for Time. I want count on bytes used. and one other problem, its return
value is Session-Timeout. It represents >remaining time not remaining bytes.
any clue which attribute will tell remaining bytes???
>Regards,
It is also for data although that is VERY poorly documented and ive had many
tro
Sorry for the noise but this is actually related to my struggles with
FreeRadius
I am using FreeRadius and authenticating Windows RAS users (PPTP)
Macintosh users via the same Windows RAS server using PPTP or L2TP,
Macintosh WAP clients and iPhone clients without a problem.
I am struggling with W
> I want to ask that if there is some kind of flexibility in freeradius to
>have time based billing. I want a customer to be charged at different rate
>at different time. Like I want to introduce a package which has different
>rate at morning eg. $1/hr from 0800 to 1200 then 0.5/hr from 1200 to 1
Hi all,
I want to ask that if there is some kind of flexibility in freeradius to
have time based billing. I want a customer to be charged at different rate
at different time. Like I want to introduce a package which has different
rate at morning eg. $1/hr from 0800 to 1200 then 0.5/hr from 1200
Hi,
> The current version of FreeRADIUS in RHEL5/CentOS is 1.1.3. It is very
> unlikely the 1.1.3 version will ever be removed from RHEL5 because of
> the commitment for version stability in an enterprise distribution. On
whoah.
apart from the fact that 1.1.3 had so many bugs and doesnt wo
After i upgrade my fedora core 9 (freeradius 2.02) to fedora core 10
(freeradius 2.1.1) i receive this message when i attempt to connect to
freeradius server.
EAPOL: EAP key not available
WPA: Failed to get master session key from EAPOL state machines
My configuration:
Server: fedora core 10 wit
Luca Adamo wrote:
> FreeRADIUS 2.1.1 seems to be unable to process the NAI decoration
What does that mean? The configuration language ("man unlang") has
support for a wide range of attribute matching && re-writing methods.
The *default* methods shipped in the example configuration files do
n
John Dennis wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file "redhat/README" telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it
Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
if such a version w
hi,
quick hack/fix would be to either
1) set 'prefix' to be }
with this, anything before and including }
(which may never appear as a realm or username)
would be treated like a NT domain and be stripped
off logically
2) use attr_rewrite or unlang to remove
the {blah blah} stuff and set the out
J Santos wrote:
Thank you Dennis,
It is a very, very useful document.
Checking both distros RHEL and CentOS there are only old packages available
(version 1.1.3) and only i386.
I have a rpm already built but it is not properly working.
Based on what you described in the doc I better insta
Hi,
I've been working and (also a little bit deploying) with FreeRADIUS
2.1.1 for a while and everything has been smooth enough.
Today for the first time I step into a problem with the handling of
NAI sent by the client through the NAS. The problem consists in the
prensence of a WiMAX de
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file "redhat/README" telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it can be a daunting ta
Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
> Hello,
> freeradius 1.1.3 on CentOS 5.2
>
> I have problem with proxying.
>
> In a normal proxying configuration
> when the username contains a domain different from local defined one
> the request is proxied to the DEFAULT proxy entry.
>
> Here instead proxy does not h
George Chelidze wrote:
> Alan DeKok wrote:
>> It doesn't. That's likely a side-effect of function call trampolines,
>> or something similar.
>>
> can you explain this in more details in a couple of words, thinking
> about this problem for 4-5 days:)
Sometimes code gets put on the stack, and e
Alan DeKok wrote:
It doesn't. That's likely a side-effect of function call trampolines,
or something similar.
can you explain this in more details in a couple of words, thinking
about this problem for 4-5 days:)
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
http://deployingradius.com/documents/configuration/active_directory.html
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 2/12/2008, "Bashir Jahed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I am running Centos 5.2 with freeradius-2.1.1. Currently authenticating
>against mysql, what would be the best way to a
Hi,
I am running Centos 5.2 with freeradius-2.1.1. Currently authenticating
against mysql, what would be the best way to add active directory as an
additional authentication source?
A guide or how to would be great...
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/us
George Chelidze wrote:
> The weird thing with this problem is that localtime_r() calls
> fr_hash_table_finddata() as you mentioned.
It doesn't. That's likely a side-effect of function call trampolines,
or something similar.
> I have removed
> strftime()/localtime_r() calls from print.c and it
Hello,
freeradius 1.1.3 on CentOS 5.2
I have problem with proxying.
In a normal proxying configuration
when the username contains a domain different from local defined one
the request is proxied to the DEFAULT proxy entry.
Here instead proxy does not happen
and I have this warning in the logs:
Jos Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
>> It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
>> install the "latest" RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
>
> This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a "sliding" base?
I didn'
Hi,
> The main "download" page on freeradius.org has a link to:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=298
>
>
> Which has RPMs of recent versions. But who reads the web page?
your typical rh/fed/centos user would never visit the homepage
of the program/utility they
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
> It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
> install the "latest" RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a "sliding" base? And what
does "RHEL5" mean if the
Jos Vos wrote:
> RHEL (and thus CentOS) are conservative "enterprise" distros and thus
> do *not* include the newest ("bleeding edge") release of everything
> as soon as it comes out. They want to stay compatible through the
> 7 (!) years of support time. This is how it is and this is, in
> princ
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
> John Dennis wrote:
> > So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat specific
> > information:
> >
> > http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ
>
> Thanks. I've added a file "redhat/README" telling people to please go
> re
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
> supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
> (if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
>
> if such a version was availabl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
> supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
> (if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
The main "download" page on freeradius.org has a link to:
http://koji.fedo
John Dennis wrote:
> There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
> packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
> pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
> tasks.
>
> So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red
Hi,
> There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
> packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
> pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
> tasks.
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
Hi,
> Hi I put thin on the end of users.conf
>
> DEFAULT Auth-Type = Accept
>Fall-Through = Yes,
>Tunnel-Medium-Type = 6,
>Tunnel-Private-Group-Id := 250,
>Tunnel-Type = VLAN
>
> But the resultis still the same, i've got this in debug
you need to comment out the li
35 matches
Mail list logo
