the users file.
Thanks a lot for your help
Alan DeKok wrote:
Lucien RENAULT wrote:
Yes I actually read the radius -X by myself, as well as doc about users
and man 5 users, so I don't really understand why the following lines
don't add attributes to the reply :
The output o
ough = Yes
Alan DeKok wrote:
Lucien RENAULT wrote:
Yes, I checked the Access-Accept packet with tcpdump/Wireshark and they
weren't any attributes.
Here are the radiusd -X lines ( password & shared keys are for testing
purpose only...) :
The reason to use "radiusd -X" is
Yes, I checked the Access-Accept packet with tcpdump/Wireshark and they
weren't any attributes.
Here are the radiusd -X lines ( password & shared keys are for testing
purpose only...) :
Starting - reading configuration files ...
reread_config: reading radiusd.conf
Config: including file: /us
it was.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 10/12/2007, "Lucien RENAULT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše:
Hi,
I'm running a configuration where a Cisco 1600 router is running a PPPoE
server and check user passwords against a freeRadius server running
under FreeBSD.
This Radius s
Hi,
I'm running a configuration where a Cisco 1600 router is running a PPPoE
server and check user passwords against a freeRadius server running
under FreeBSD.
This Radius server checks passwords against a LDAP database running on
another BSD server.
The authentication is working great, the Rad
5 matches
Mail list logo