RE: Source IP address for proxy requests

2006-09-26 Thread Sebastien Cantos
I've you seen my post or are you just ignoring it ? :) -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Angel L. Mateo Envoyé : mardi 26 septembre 2006 08:34 À : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Objet : Re: Source IP address for proxy requests El lun

RE: Source IP address for proxy requests

2006-09-25 Thread Sebastien Cantos
On the active server (the one that have 192.168.1.1) you have to delete the route that route packets through 192.168.1.2 for subnet 192.168.1.1/24 and make sure there's a route through 192.168.1.1 for subnet 192.168.1.1/24. This way, all connexion initiate from this box will have source address 192

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2006 16:26 À : FreeRadius users mailing list Objet : Re: ippool error     On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've something like this in the user file :  

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
accounting {     …..     main_pool     ….   Regards,   Sebastien. De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2006 14:31 À : FreeRadius users mailing list Objet : Re: ippool error     On 7/31/06, Sebastien Cantos <[EM

RE: ippool error

2006-07-31 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Yes it’s possible. However you will have to store passwords in clear text format onto the ldap.   De : freeradius-users-bounces+s.can[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Giuseppina Venezia Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2006 12:13 À : FreeRadius users mailing list

RE: rlm_ippool and tcp TIME_WAIT state

2006-07-19 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Phil Mayers wrote: > It would in theory be possible to save the key from the last walk, and > next time we allocate an IP start from that key and wrap back around, > which would allocate IPs in a more round-robin fashion. Yes, that should be a solution. I was more thinking of adding a parameter

RE: rlm_ippool and tcp TIME_WAIT state

2006-07-19 Thread Sebastien Cantos
Hi,   I’ve noticed that rlm_ippool is nearly always reassigning an IP address that has just been releasing for a new connexion. This cause some TCP connexion problems because of the TIME_WAIT state.   Scenario: 1/ one device connects using source port 1024 (ppp) and gets an IP address