hello all,
i am currently trying to proxy accounting to another freeradius server. the
accounting request receives the proxied server but i get the following
message in with debug:
+- entering group accounting {...}
[sql_default] expand: packet has no accounting status type. [user
'%{User-Name}',
there was a bug with NT_STATUS_PIPE_DISCONNECTED from last year in the
samba. i think i have tried 2 or 3 stable versions right now.
ill gonna compile the latest from svn tree and report back after a view
tests.
-euro
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> mr typo wrote:
>
humm, even when its not working with a mac or other devices?
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> mr typo wrote:
> > update: not working again. 4 or 5 requests were working, now it is the
> > same problem again.
> >
> > stopping at the access-challenge..
update: not working again. 4 or 5 requests were working, now it is the same
problem again.
stopping at the access-challenge..
-euro
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM, mr typo wrote:
> so mschap is working again, but now radius stops processing at sending the
> access-challenge to the acces
= 0x
State = 0x193fdf6a1034c6d4fb779767b11c2fbf
Finished request 9.
Going to the next request
Waking up in 1.0 seconds.
Cleaning up request 0 ID 65 with timestamp +7
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:31 AM, mr typo wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have added the with_nt_do
ok
MSCHAP Success
++[eap] returns handled
but i never receive a access-accept. from my understanding it should work?
the complete debug log is at:
https://overlord.fh-salzburg.ac.at/~asartori/debug.txt
i hope someone can help!
kind regards
-euro
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:02 PM, mr typo wrote:
}
so i configure ntlm_auth from the modules and put the directive ntlm_auth
just before "Auth-Type MS-CHAP"?
ill try that tomorrow, right now i have no chance to test it out.
regards
-euro
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> mr typo wrote:
> > [mschap] Told
hey all,
we do have a freeradius server authenticating with ntml_auth against a win
2008r2 server. this was working for several months but for 2 weeks now the
authentication does not work anymore.
authenticating on the command line with ntlm_auth is still working:
[r...@wlan ~]# ntlm_auth --reque
update reply {
Reply-Message := "FHSCommon: Wrong Username"
}
reject
}
}
maybe someone knows why the "failed to find module..." appears when using
policy.conf
kind regards
-euro
when i put the "validate_username" direct after
server eduroam {
validate_username
authorize {
.
i do not get an error. but it doesnt work. i am just trying around, i know
that the "validate_username" doesnt make sense when NOT in the authorize
section.
so anyone has an idea redg
ts?
-euro
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> mr typo wrote:
> >
> > i was trying to reject those "double" realm.
> > but i cannot find the right syntax and/or where to put the lines.
> >
> > i was trying to put this lines in the u
t 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> mr typo wrote:
> >
> > i do have a problem with our freeradius configuration and i have no idea
> how
> > to solve it.
> >
> > we do have one realm configured domainname.com which works perfectly.
> every
> >
where would be the best place to deny those users?
we do not have alot of practice with freeradius, so
any help would be appreciated,
kind regards
-euroreg
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:03 PM, mr typo wrote:
> hey,
> yes we are talking about eduroam and after reading your post, it seems
hey,
yes we are talking about eduroam and after reading your post, it seems like
that it is the best
to deny such users.
thanks alot
-euroreg
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Winter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > problem is, that we are a university, so they are "our" people.
> > tousands of student
problem is, that we are a university, so they are "our" people. tousands of
students and teachers. if we deny those users, our helpdesk will get more
work.
is there a way to remove the double entries or do i have to block those?
-euroreg
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello all,
i do have a problem with our freeradius configuration and i have no idea how
to solve it.
we do have one realm configured domainname.com which works perfectly. every
user who wants to authenticate with a different realm is proxied to an
outside radius. server. the setup works fine.
we
16 matches
Mail list logo
