Keith Moores wrote:
> I think I understand the concern as to part 2 of Michael's patch
> proposal, but would that apply to incorporating part 1, extending the
> "check_cert_cn" functionality? Would it be useful rework and submit
> a patch that just addressed that? A first step?
Yes. I p
I think I understand the concern as to part 2 of Michael's patch
proposal, but would that apply to incorporating part 1, extending the
"check_cert_cn" functionality? Would it be useful rework and submit
a patch that just addressed that? A first step?
-Keith
On May 18, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Al
Keith Moores wrote:
> In trying to come up with a our own solution to the same problem I
> discovered the following previous patch proposal by Michael Joosten
> from 2005.
>
> Incorporating this functionality would be greatly appreciated:
...
> I couldn't find any comments on this (other than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Joosten)
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:16:40 +0100
> Subject: certificate patches for EAP TLS module, plus some questions..
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --010606020309030200040704
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
