Re: Confused about default Reject

2005-04-04 Thread Greg Swift
Jason Frisvold wrote: On Apr 4, 2005 4:25 PM, Greg Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sending Access-Accept of id 188 to 64.238.139.2:7016 Reply-Message = "This feature is not enabled for this userid" Ascend-Maximum-Channels := 0 Finished request 38 This looks correct, if I unde

Re: Confused about default Reject

2005-04-04 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Apr 4, 2005 4:25 PM, Greg Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sending Access-Accept of id 188 to 64.238.139.2:7016 > Reply-Message = "This feature is not enabled for this userid" > Ascend-Maximum-Channels := 0 > Finished request 38 This looks correct, if I understand what you've

Re: Confused about default Reject

2005-04-04 Thread Greg Swift
Jason Frisvold wrote: On Apr 4, 2005 2:30 PM, Greg Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was working on my system, and to be honest I had never really tried to verify if my "disabled" users group worked properly. Then this morning I shutdown a user that was spamming, and put them in that group, an

Re: Confused about default Reject

2005-04-04 Thread Jason Frisvold
On Apr 4, 2005 2:30 PM, Greg Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was working on my system, and to be honest I had never really tried to > verify if my "disabled" users group worked properly. Then this morning > I shutdown a user that was spamming, and put them in that group, and > they were back

Confused about default Reject

2005-04-04 Thread Greg Swift
I was working on my system, and to be honest I had never really tried to verify if my "disabled" users group worked properly. Then this morning I shutdown a user that was spamming, and put them in that group, and they were back online a minute later... I was very confused at this point. The l