Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-04-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Ranner, Frank MR wrote: > I've noticed that NAS-Port is sometimes not sent, particularly in > accounting requests. This caused the > Accounting request to essentially be discarded. Uh... no. The server doesn't work like that. > What I figured was to > use the source udp port as a > pseudo na

RE: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2008-04-06 Thread Ranner, Frank MR
UNCLASSIFIED > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] eradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2008 20:22 > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > Subject: Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access req

RE: Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865

2008-04-04 Thread Ramm-Ericson, Johannes
Alan DeKok wrote: >Ramm-Ericson, Johannes wrote: >>>From what I understand the current Freeradius code interprets the RFC >> statement so that if the NAS-Port attribute is not sent then the access >> request is not processed and subsequently denied (in rlm_radutmp.c - >> line 404). > > No. > > Th

RE: Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865

2008-04-04 Thread Ramm-Ericson, Johannes
Alan DeKok wrote: >Ramm-Ericson, Johannes wrote: >> OK. However, access requests from that particular NAS are in effect >> not processed the way I expect because of the lacking NAS-Port which >> still leaves me with a problem I need to understand and fix. > > There is likely nothing that you ca

Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865

2008-04-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Ramm-Ericson, Johannes wrote: > OK. However, access requests from that particular NAS are in effect not > processed the way I expect because of the lacking NAS-Port which still > leaves me with a problem I need to understand and fix. There is likely nothing that you can do. This is the reality

Re: Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865

2008-04-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Ramm-Ericson, Johannes wrote: >>From what I understand the current Freeradius code interprets the RFC > statement so that if the NAS-Port attribute is not sent then the access > request is not processed and subsequently denied (in rlm_radutmp.c - > line 404). No. The *radutmp* module requires

Missing NAS-Port in Access request with respect to RFC 2865

2008-04-03 Thread Ramm-Ericson, Johannes
Hello Freeradius-users, >From what I see in the mailing list archives several freeradius users have historically run into trouble with Access-Request information sent by NASes and particularly the lack of the NAS-Port attribute. I've run into it quite often recently and was wondering if I may hav