Alex Savguira wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I've solved my problems already... I've even finished the custom
> modification to dialup-admin which takes care of changing the
> Crypt-Passwords to User-Passwords for users accessing the new
> services. Thanks for clearing things up...
>
>>> btest| NT-Pa
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I understood your point, but would you be so kind to explain WHY
> do you think it is such a bad idea
As I said before: it gains you nothing but additional complexity.
It's completely unnecessary.
> none of the network technitians on-site can abu
Alan,
I've solved my problems already... I've even finished the custom
modification to dialup-admin which takes care of changing the
Crypt-Passwords to User-Passwords for users accessing the new
services. Thanks for clearing things up...
>> btest| NT-Password | == | NT-hashbla-bla-bla^&&
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An ideal situation for me would be
> something like this in radcheck:
> username | att| op |val
> --+-++---
> btest| NT-Password | == | NT-hashbla-bla-bla^&&@0-3443
> btest
Hi, Alan!
Thanks for answering...
First of all I never intended to use CRYPT passwords for MS-CHAPv2.
C'mon, I know that much about MS-CHAP. ;-) Not all my users need
access to new services, as I wrote, I was planning to expose the
cleartext password for those who need (perhaps NT-Password in th
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan, please, you asked me to try := instead of == . I did and it does not
> work.
> Somehow I needed to inform you it did not.
You need to post the debug log of it using the "users" file entry
after you changed == to :=/
> I did in my first post.
Dear Alan!
> See the FAQ about pointless statements like "it doesn't work".
Alan, please, you asked me to try := instead of == . I did and it does not work.
Somehow I needed to inform you it did not.
> Maybe you could try reading the debug output. Or failing that,
>posting it here.
I did in my
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried that already. Same result... DOES NOT work
See the FAQ about pointless statements like "it doesn't work". If
you're going to make people on the list play "twenty questions" to get
the information they need to help you, no one is going to r
Dear Alan!
>You want to use ":=", not "==", both here and in SQL. That will
>make it work.
>
> Alan DeKok.
I've tried that already. Same result... DOES NOT work... (AND it works
with both
== and := when I use users file instead)... With SQL it produces the
very same debugging output with both =
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course it works if I only have a single encrypted problem. This is
> exactly where my problem is. I do run a bunch of services onsite, some
> using the PAP passwords (CRYPT form) and some using the MS-CHAPv2
> (partly internal and partly accessing the
"Alex Savguira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea why placing the following two lines into
> users file works perfectly with both PAP and CHAP
> users
> btest User-Password == Master1
You want to use ":=", not "==", both here and in SQL. That will
make it work.
Alan De
>Of course it works if I only have a single encrypted problem
Drat! I mean only a single encrypted password record in a database of course
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi, Gerry.
Thanks for an answer...
>I'll bet if you only have a single encrypted entry that will work.
>
>This is just a guess on my part but give it a shot.
>
>Gerry
Of course it works if I only have a single encrypted problem. This is
exactly where my problem is. I do run a bunch of services ons
This is just a quess..
Since you are doing a sql look-up, I will bet it does the select *
from xxx where username like btest. It returns both records, but
only processes the first record, the passwords don't match and
fails. I'll bet if you only have a single encrypted entry that will wor
Please anybody help me... I am reposting this message, since I am
hitting the dead end with this issue
Thanks in advance...
Hi to all...
Does anyone have any idea why placing the following two lines into
users file works perfectly with both PAP and CHAP
users
btest User-Password == Master1
15 matches
Mail list logo
