Re: buffered-sql doesn't make sense to me

2009-05-04 Thread Ivan Kalik
> So, once buffered-sql is configured correctly, it's the same thing as > decoupled-accounting. Is that right? Not exactly. decoupled-accounting doesn't use default vitual server to write to detail file. You define an extra virtual server that only writes to detail file and reference it in listen

Re: buffered-sql doesn't make sense to me

2009-05-04 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 21:29 +0100, Ivan Kalik wrote: > No. Your understanding of how it works is incomplete. Ok, fair enough. But,... > > The example "buffered-sql" file says to use one virtual server to log to > > the detail file, > > Yes. That would be default virtual server (by default).

Re: buffered-sql doesn't make sense to me

2009-05-04 Thread Ivan Kalik
> I'm trying to set up buffered-sql on my test freeradius server. I've > been reading the example config files, but I'm confused because the > buffered-sql example seems to be incomplete. No. Your understanding of how it works is incomplete. > The example "buffered-sql" file says to use one virt

buffered-sql doesn't make sense to me

2009-05-04 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Hi All, I'm trying to set up buffered-sql on my test freeradius server. I've been reading the example config files, but I'm confused because the buffered-sql example seems to be incomplete. The example "buffered-sql" file says to use one virtual server to log to the detail file, and another virt