WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) radtmp DOES have access to the same information.
>
> So, if rlm_radutmp does have access to the same information, why isn't
> it pruning radutmp?
Because the information it has is probably not the information it
needs.
> As I have asked before, if
Alan DeKok wrote:
>
> WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All the information that shows in radwho is logged in the detail file
> > with a STOP record, so rlm_radutmp has access to the correct
> > information, right?
>
> Uh, no. The stop record may not contain the information needed by
WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All the information that shows in radwho is logged in the detail file
> with a STOP record, so rlm_radutmp has access to the correct
> information, right?
Uh, no. The stop record may not contain the information needed by
radutmp, even when the detail file
> > > The other files have specific requirements, and therefore don't know
> > > what to do with some packets, when those packets don't contain the
> > > information then need.
> >
> > Like what information?
>
> The information which shows up when you do "radwho", or "radlast".
All the inform
WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other files have specific requirements, and therefore don't know
> > what to do with some packets, when those packets don't contain the
> > information then need.
>
> Like what information?
The information which shows up when you do "radwho", or "
Thanks for the reply,
Alan DeKok wrote:
>
> WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the detail file gets the STOP record, why don't radutmp and radwtmp
> > get pruned? It is like parts of the code are not really communication
> > with each other.
>
> They do. It's just that the detail m
WA Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the detail file gets the STOP record, why don't radutmp and radwtmp
> get pruned? It is like parts of the code are not really communication
> with each other.
They do. It's just that the detail module does *nothing* with the
request, except log it to
Hello,
We are using freeradius 0.7.1 on a redhat linux box.
Does anyone have any ideas why some of our users are not getting pruned
out of radutmp and radwtmp even though I can see STOP records in the
detail file for the user session?
I have Simultaneous-Use := 1 set as a DEFAULT in users, and w
Hello,
We are using freeradius 0.7.1 on a redhat linux box.
Does anyone have any ideas why some of our users are not getting pruned
out of radutmp and radwtmp even though I can see STOP records in the
detail file for the user session?
I have Simultaneous-Use := 1 set as a DEFAULT in users, and w
9 matches
Mail list logo
