Hi,
> 1) Could bad accounting packets cause the radiusd process to EXIT?
> 2) Could bad accounting packets result in hung child processes (as seen
> in the gdb output after the radius log file)?
I'd say yes. we ensure that bad packets dont hit our accounting servers eg
accounting {
> I think you may be 'jumping the gun' a wee bit.
>
> The system currently has over 13,000 active sessions.
>
> There were some odd accounting packets, but the vast majority were valid.
> These could be configuration errors or hack attempts (investigating).
Something broke at 2am. Before that you
day, October 18, 2009 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: over 30 radiusd processes - more information
I've continued to try an investigate the root cause of this, and the last
run behaved slightly differently - the parent process seems to have
terminated, and there are more messages in the radius log.
Ther
Craig Campbell wrote:
> I have attached the radius.log file below, as well as gdb sessions for
> the hung processes showing the results of the gd 'bt' and 'list' commands.
The log is interesting.
> Sat Oct 17 02:01:25 2009 : Error: WARNING: Unresponsive child for
> request 165616, in module sql
> I've continued to try an investigate the root cause of this, and the last
> run behaved slightly differently - the parent process seems to have
> terminated, and there are more messages in the radius log.
>
> There were four (4) hung processes left over.
>
> I have attached the radius.log file be
I've continued to try an investigate the root cause of this, and the last
run behaved slightly differently - the parent process seems to have
terminated, and there are more messages in the radius log.
There were four (4) hung processes left over.
I have attached the radius.log file below, as w
Craig Campbell wrote:
> While the ps command doesn't show the time of these extra processes
> (over 24 hours old), in a previous event, I determined they seemed to
> coincide with a significant increase in radius traffic (from ~100/min to
> over 1000/min) I believe the NAS forces all users to log
1.7 (but I just finished configuring
2.1.6 :( 2.1.7 wasn't released when I started this..)
Thoughts?
Thanks (everyone),
-craig
- Original Message -
From: "Marinko Tarlac"
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: o
I had a same problem when one of our databases was terrible slow...
Is there anything in radius.log ?
Alan DeKok wrote:
Craig Campbell wrote:
Freeradius 2.1.6
Running on Redhat AS5 Update 3
with mysql-devel rpms added to enable mysql support.
Compiled with no options specified. (./configu
Craig Campbell wrote:
> Freeradius 2.1.6
>
> Running on Redhat AS5 Update 3
> with mysql-devel rpms added to enable mysql support.
>
> Compiled with no options specified. (./configure ; make clean ; make ;
> make install)
I don't know.. all I know is it cleans up processes when I run them,
and
rs mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: over 30 radiusd processes
Craig Campbell wrote:
Up to 65 processes now
Any ideas how to stop this from happening?
Which version are you running?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www
Craig Campbell wrote:
> Up to 65 processes now
>
> Any ideas how to stop this from happening?
Which version are you running?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Up to 65 processes now
Any ideas how to stop this from happening?
Anyone?
Thanks,
-craig
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok"
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: over 30 radiusd processes
Craig
better alternative?
>
>
> Thanks so much!
> -craig
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Alan DeKok"
> To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 4:17 PM
> Subject: Re: over 30 radiusd processes
>
>
>>
exconvert -lX %{User-Name} }")
Is this bad?
Is there a better alternative?
Thanks so much!
-craig
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok"
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: over 30 radiusd processes
Craig Camp
Craig Campbell wrote:
> radius-a seems to be getting the bulk of the radius records. Normally,
> it has a single process.
> Last night it spawned a bunch of children that seem to be loitering...
Are you forking shell scripts via "exec"?
> radius-b and radius-c don't have more than a single ra
: FreeRadius users mailing list
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:07 PM
Subject: over 30 radiusd processes
I am runnning 2.1.6 on Redhat Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release
5.3 (Tikanga)).
This server relays all records to an identical server radius-b and radius-c
Similarly
I am runnning 2.1.6 on Redhat Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release
5.3 (Tikanga)).
This server relays all records to an identical server radius-b and radius-c
Similarly radius-b relays its records back to radius-a (except those from
radius-a)
radius-c is just for testing.
All relaying
18 matches
Mail list logo
