angeset caused the regresession, or (even better) provide a
patch to fix this :)
>
> If this was the only problem, it wouldn't be any problem, but I'm
> having the same problem with radzap:
>
> /usr/bin/radzap -P 131833856 -u -N localhost
> radwho: No configuration
lem is that now -F options is mandatory
instead of optional.
If this was the only problem, it wouldn't be any problem, but I'm
having the same problem with radzap:
/usr/bin/radzap -P 131833856 -u -N localhost
radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf!
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>>> accounting {
>>> detail
>>> unix
>>> #radutmp
>>
>>
>>Well, that won't help.
>>
>>You're trying to use "radwho", but aren't logging accounting
>> information. That means "radwho" will NEVER show you anything.
>>
>
error I get is;
radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf
You need to have a "modules" section, with "radutmp" listed in it.
In my modules section I have
modules {
...
$INCLUDE ${confdir}/modules/
..
}
and I have
get is;
>
> radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf
You need to have a "modules" section, with "radutmp" listed in it.
> My config (for default virtual server) is:
Which doesn't really help.
What's in the "modules
Hello,
I have a problem with radwho since I upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.2.0. The
same configuration (I'm trying now the default configuration installed
from ubuntu packages) works with version 2.1.10 and not with 2.2.0. The
error I get is;
radwho: No configuration information in ra
6 matches
Mail list logo
