On Thursday, 25. September 2008 08:48, Alan DeKok wrote:
> No. getpwent still depends on the calling application having
> permission to read /etc/shadow.
and that was it. I had screwed up file ownership by touching
it with XEmacs. Sorry for answering that late and thanks for
your help.
Martin
++[unix] returns notfound
OK...
> [ the whole thing is sent to LDAP for authorization now which succeeds, but
> could perhaps be avoided anyway]
? What do you mean by that?
> So to me it looks like rlm_unix can't find me :-(
The module just calls the system API's to
r. Authentication may
fail because of this.
++[pap] returns noop
Found Auth-Type = System
+- entering group authenticate {...}
++[unix] returns notfound
Failed to authenticate the user.
Using Post-Auth-Type Reject
+- entering group REJECT {...}
expand: %{User-Name} -> pauly
attr_filter: Match
Mark Jones wrote:
> Was there any particular reason to remove the ability to specify what
> passwd and shadow file to use with the unix module?
It didn't work on some systems, and it duplicated the functionality of
the "passwd" module.
> Unless I misunderstand. the unix module can me used in
the authenticate
section where the passwd module can only be used in the authorize section.
- Original Message -
From: "Alan DeKok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: rlm_unix
Mark
Mark Jones wrote:
> True enough but I am unclear as to how to do it with passwd and shadow
> file and groups file. Are there an example config that someone has I
> can see to get a better understanding of what I have to do?
raddb/modules/etc_group has a sample configuration for reading /etc/group
quot;FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:28 AM
Subject: Re: rlm_unix
Mark Jones wrote:
In our unique situation I have until now been using the rlm_unix module
in multiple instances to read about 5 different passwd/shadow file
combinations. This was fine unti
Mark Jones wrote:
> In our unique situation I have until now been using the rlm_unix module
> in multiple instances to read about 5 different passwd/shadow file
> combinations. This was fine until 2.05 were the ability to specify the
> path to those files has been removed. I know it i
I am installing a new server running freeradius 2.0.5 to replace a server
running 1.1.7.
In our unique situation I have until now been using the rlm_unix module in
multiple instances to read about 5 different passwd/shadow file combinations.
This was fine until 2.05 were the ability to
OK, but how I can do that ???
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/freeradius-1.1.2---rlm_unix-on-AMD-64-t1740156.html#a4745504
Sent from the FreeRadius - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
MaKKrO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> radiusd.conf[604] Failed to link to module 'rlm_unix':
> /usr/lib64/rlm_unix.a: invalid ELF header
Build the server with shared library support.
Why do some modules work, and others fail?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe
tiated pam (pam)
radiusd.conf[604] Failed to link to module 'rlm_unix':
/usr/lib64/rlm_unix.a: invalid ELF header
radiusd.conf[1880] Unknown module "unix".
radiusd.conf[1840] Failed to parse authenticate section.
I tried to downgrade, but no older version are available on Gentoo
Hi,
I have find the problem ...
in radiusd.conf just comment the 3 lines
# passwd = /etc/passwd
# shadow = /etc/shadow
# group = /etc/group
In freebsd unix autentication is diferent from regular unix/linux
We have a passwd, a group but we haven't a sh
r where I was using the rlm_unix
> module to authenticate users against the passwd and shadow files, but even
> when the correct login and password was being used the user was not being
> authenticated. There was nothing reported in the log files at all apart
> from "Authentication
Hi,
I had a problem with the Radius server where I was using the rlm_unix
module to authenticate users against the passwd and shadow files, but even
when the correct login and password was being used the user was not being
authenticated. There was nothing reported in the log files at all apart
us : /usr/local/sbin/radiusd -X -A
I have this error this radius try to load the rlm_unix module :
radiusd.conf[605] Failed to link to module 'rlm_unix':
/usr/local/lib/rlm_unix-1.0.1.so: undefined symbol: nscd_flush_cache
someone have a solution for my problem ?
best regards
dom
begi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having the problem of no user being able to pass the correct
> password. The below message and the thread it came from did solve the
> problem, however I was wondering if there is another way to fix this
> problem besides forcing radiusd to run as root.
Make a "s
: rlm_unix error invalid password
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 06:47:44 -0700
Try commenting lines user= and group= in radiusd.conf and start
radiusd as root.
I had the same problem. Although daemon's group was listed as being
member of shadow group it seems it wasn't working i.e. it was unab
All,
I am having difficulty loading the unix module. When I do so I get the ol'
unable to link rlm_unix library error.
I have read the faq and the radiusd.conf instructions with regards to this
error and followed the suggested fix, but it does not help. Only until I
comment out the
I tried to
compile it from the tar.gz downloaded from your site, but still getting
the same error. Gentoo installation is updated with the latest snapshot.
I think that there's no problems with libraries because radiusd can
start if I comment the module unix in radiusd.conf and all rlm_unix li
Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking thru the radiusd.conf config file, it looks
> like 'unix' module is only used for authentication w/
> /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
>
> Is it used for anything else?
Keep reading the "radiusd.conf"
> Will it cause problems if I comment it out?
Most l
Hi.
Looking thru the radiusd.conf config file, it looks
like 'unix' module is only used for authentication w/
/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
Is it used for anything else?
Will it cause problems if I comment it out?
Jeff
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:07:11AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
>> I have Freeradius 0.9.3 up and running with Gentoo
>> Linux on x86 hardware. I had to comment out every
>> instance of the unix module in radiusd.conf to get
>> Freeradius to compile on Gentoo (for some reason
>
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:24:50PM +0100, Ciolo_-^DusT^-_WebMaster wrote:
> the secret...
> the secret word is given or I have to create it on my own...
> and if I have have to create it or declare it...
> where... there are some particular suggestions in how to create a secret
> key...
Well... Le
the secret...
the secret word is given or I have to create it on my own...
and if I have have to create it or declare it...
where... there are some particular suggestions in how to create a secret
key...
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:07:11AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> I have Freeradius 0.9.3 up and running with Gentoo
> Linux on x86 hardware. I had to comment out every
> instance of the unix module in radiusd.conf to get
> Freeradius to compile on Gentoo (for some reason
> 'rlm_unix
Hi all,
I have Freeradius 0.9.3 up and running with Gentoo
Linux on x86 hardware. I had to comment out every
instance of the unix module in radiusd.conf to get
Freeradius to compile on Gentoo (for some reason
'rlm_unix' module doesn't compile on Gentoo).
Authentication is done
27 matches
Mail list logo
