Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

> morning_wood, you should be the LAST person to comment on anything Chris > has done. > pipe up when you have something useful to say. > > -sb > I did, and my info was disiminated nearly verbatim http://nothackers.org/pipermail/0day/2003-July/000143.html http://nothackers.org/pipermail/0day/2003-J

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

a newly released ranking of the > Internet's most severe vulnerabilities. " > > > - Original Message ----- > From: Larry Roberts > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:33 AM > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

the patches are installed rather then based on partial information. Be is file dates or existence of files. My $.02 -Original Message- From: Larry Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

At 08:40 PM 8/2/03 -0700, morning_wood wrote: AND YOUR POINT IS? did i refer to anything oyher that my topic? NO - I know Chis's reputation, that was not an issue now was it ??? so again.. go drink some warm STFU please Oh, I need to have a point?  That would run rather contrary to the vast maj

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

st 02, 2003 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-) At 04:09 AM 8/1/03 -0700, morning_wood wrote: musta been after he read 0day at nothackers.org sounds REAL original ,"Chris" good job,   thanks huh?I guarantee you that "Chr

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

At 04:09 AM 8/1/03 -0700, morning_wood wrote:   musta been after he read 0day at nothackers.org sounds REAL original ,"Chris" good job,   thanks huh? I guarantee you that "Chris" has written more 0days and general security utilities than you've even imagined in your most febrile moments. m

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-) Group,   Not sure if everyone saw this yet.   http://www.msnbc.com/news/946460.asp?cp1=1   Thanks,Larry RobertsCCIE #7886 (R&S / Security)President - Nexperts, Inc "The Networking Experts"Office

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

Although we encourage you to pay attention to all security bulletins and to deploy patches in a timely manner, we want to call special attention to this particular instance. We have become aware of some activity on the Internet that we believe increases the likelihood of exploiting this vulnerabi

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

ecurity Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ -Original Message- From: Larry Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

from the article: "Security companies (...) have monitored hackers in discussion groups and chat rooms exchanging tips about how to improve the effectiveness of their programs." like that's something very hard to be done... fear At 00:33 1/8/2003 -0700, Larry Roberts wrote: Group, Not sure if

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

the Internet’s most severe vulnerabilities. "     - Original Message - From: Larry Roberts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:33 AM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-) Group,   Not sure if e

[Full-Disclosure] Oh no - the feds are on to us :-)

Group,   Not sure if everyone saw this yet.   http://www.msnbc.com/news/946460.asp?cp1=1   Thanks,Larry RobertsCCIE #7886 (R&S / Security)President - Nexperts, Inc "The Networking Experts"Office - (602) 445-3915Cell - (480) 231-3713