binBnQjdb5EB5.bin
Description: application/fw
> "MG" == Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MG> It should be "autoreconf; automake", so the first automake may not
MG> help. Or maybe "aclocal; automake; autoconf; autoheader".
Do I need to change how snapshots are built? This looks like what
caused this morning's failure. The cu
On 27 Feb 2002 18:37:18 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> Also, if we would have ResizeMove, the patch may be 1-2 lines shorter. :-)
I mean MoveMaximize not ResizeMove.
I don't really request it, ResizeMoveMaximize keep keep emulates it well.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web pa
On 27 Feb 2002 12:07:18 -0600, FVWM CVS wrote:
>
> CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
> Module name: fvwm
> Changes by: migo02/02/27 12:07:18
>
> Modified files:
> . : NEWS
> modules: ChangeLog
> modules/FvwmRearrange: FvwmRearrange.1 FvwmRearrange.c
>
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: migo02/02/27 12:07:18
Modified files:
. : NEWS
modules: ChangeLog
modules/FvwmRearrange: FvwmRearrange.1 FvwmRearrange.c
Log message:
* New FvwmRearrange arguments -maximize, -n
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: migo02/02/27 12:01:10
Modified files:
. : Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog NEWS
fvwm : Tag: branch-2_4 commands.h conditional.c
functions.c functions.h fvwm2.1
Log m
On 27 Feb 2002 06:26:48 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> Mikhael, with your latest commit I get a message from automake:
>
> fvwm/Makefile.am:30: variable `FT2_LIBS' not defined
I did not add FT2 code, but it seems ok at a glance.
> (one for each Makefile). This only goes away after I run
> au
? fvwm-snap-20020110.tar.gz
? fvwm-snap-20020111.tar.gz
? fvwm-snap-20020112.tar.gz
P ChangeLog
P NEWS
P acconfig.h
P acinclude.m4
P configure.in
P fvwm/Makefile.am
P fvwm/add_window.c
P fvwm/conditional.c
P fvwm/events.c
P fvwm/fvwm2.1
P fvwm/menus.c
P libs/Bindings.c
U libs/Fft.c
P libs/Flocale.c
On 27 Feb 2002 13:12:02 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:40:51AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > If you think this is a mix, yes, but it is not different from this:
> >
> > Current (foobar) Next (foobar2) Close
> >
> > For me it should return:
> >
> > * Curr
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:40:51AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2002 10:58:05 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >
> > > We shouldn't mix both because it would become hard to understand for
> > > example
> > >
> > > Curre
I'm not sure if its relevant, but in our project we found that using an
automated tool to force
all the code into a single format as it went under change control helped
immensely when
comparing versions. Often different contributors used different editors or
conventions.
I was against the
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:58:05AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
[snip]
> > I did not say that other commands *can* not have a return code but
> > that they *do* not have one. My intentions was to keep the return
> > code of conditionals s
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt02/02/27 05:43:54
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : conditional.c fvwm2.1
Log message:
* Some Cond/CondCase fixes.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvw
On 27 Feb 2002 10:58:05 +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > We shouldn't mix both because it would become hard to understand for
> > example
> >
> > Current (foobar) Read
> >
> > returns (the rc of Read or the rc of Current?).
>
> It
On 27 Feb 2002 07:17:12 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:43:29AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2002 01:42:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >
> > > [SNIP, see mailing list archive for more details]
> > >
> > > I've made a shot at the "if-else" syntax. Now
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt02/02/27 02:04:26
Modified files:
fvwm : events.c
Log message:
* Removed debug fprintfs.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubs
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:55:34AM +0100, fvwm-workers wrote:
> If anybody has noticed: I've changed the way I indent my code to
> using a basic indentation width of 8 spaces instead of 2. Nobody
> needs to comply with that choice, but when I come across parts of
> the code I might reindent it.
If anybody has noticed: I've changed the way I indent my code to
using a basic indentation width of 8 spaces instead of 2. Nobody
needs to comply with that choice, but when I come across parts of
the code I might reindent it. The reasons for my change of mind
can be found in the Linux kernel cod
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt02/02/27 01:46:11
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : add_window.c events.c
Log message:
* Fixed focus loss with RecaptureWindow and mousey focus.
--
Visit the official F
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt02/02/27 01:33:08
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog NEWS acinclude.m4
fvwm : events.c fvwm2.1
libs : Bindings.c fvwmlib.h
Log message:
* New contexts '[]-_<>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:37:00PM -0600, fvwm-bug wrote:
> FVWM Bug Tracking notification
>
> new message incoming/858
>
> Full_Name: Daniel Speyer
> Version: 2.4.5
> CVS_Date:
> OS: Debian GNU/Linux
> X_Server: 4.1
> Submission from: (NULL) (129.2.159.61)
>
>
> I typically run with a toolbar
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:43:29AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2002 01:42:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > [SNIP, see mailing list archive for more details]
> >
> > I've made a shot at the "if-else" syntax. Now, all conditional
> > commands (and only conditional commands) hav
22 matches
Mail list logo
