Re: [Gambas-user] Gambas3

2009-11-06 Thread Ricardo Díaz Martín
take a look in http://gambas.sourceforge.net/ at download link and at READ THESE IMPORTANT NOTES AND THIS PAGE FIRST. * *for production apps I'm only use gambas2 at the moment Regards 2009/11/6 Kad Mann > Is

Re: [Gambas-user] PING > Benoît (ServerSocket)

2009-11-06 Thread Emil Tchekov
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean-Yves F. Barbier [mailto:12u...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 6. November 2009 09:13 An: mailing list for gambas users Betreff: Re: [Gambas-user]PING > Benoît (ServerSocket) >Kad Mann a écrit : >... >> >> I have the problem on linux and linux alone. Win

Re: [Gambas-user] PING > Benoît (ServerSocket)

2009-11-06 Thread Kad Mann
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 09:20 +0100, Ron wrote: > Ok fair enough ... > Overlooked the linux-localhost part, so you're right we cannot point at > Bill. lol > Did you try to run valgrind tool already like Benoit suggested? Not just yet. I've almost maxed out my bandwidth and still have a week to g

Re: [Gambas-user] PING > Benoît (ServerSocket)

2009-11-06 Thread Ron
Kad Mann wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 08:37 +0100, Ron wrote: > >> Kad Mann wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:45 +0100, Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote: >>> >>> Benoît Minisini a écrit : ... > But if rebooting your Linux server does not make

Re: [Gambas-user] PING > Benoît (ServerSocket)

2009-11-06 Thread Jean-Yves F. Barbier
Kad Mann a écrit : ... > > I have the problem on linux and linux alone. Windows has nothing to do > with it. windows might be disturbing the force... ... > Also nothing to do with it. The problem occurred first when a Windows > server was involved, however it has also happened since on a standal

Re: [Gambas-user] PING > Benoît (ServerSocket)

2009-11-06 Thread Kad Mann
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 08:37 +0100, Ron wrote: > Kad Mann wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:45 +0100, Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote: > > > >> Benoît Minisini a écrit : > >> ... > >> > >>> But if rebooting your Linux server does not make the application work > >>> again, I > >>> can't really