On 06/12/2011 03:50 PM, Tomek wrote:
> I've ported around 20 OpenGl tutorials already and you can find them on
> gambasforum.com.
gambasforum.com has been moved to whiteislandsoftware.com. I found all
the OpenGL examples here:
http://whiteislandsoftware.com/forum/index.php?page=topicview&type=m
El 27/07/11 12:53, Demosthenes Koptsis escribió:
> Thanks Ian!
>
> It would be more easy the RegExp to return an Array of results like grep
> returns all the matches of multiline text.
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 20:13 +1000, Ian Haywood wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Demosthenes Kop
On 07/27/2011 11:33 AM, Caveat wrote:
> Last time I looked this wasn't a mailing list dedicated exclusively to
> technical subjects, but a mailing list for Gambas developers to share
> ideas and have discussions. We're the kind of people that are most
> likely to be at risk from the crazy software
Last time I looked this wasn't a mailing list dedicated exclusively to
technical subjects, but a mailing list for Gambas developers to share
ideas and have discussions. We're the kind of people that are most
likely to be at risk from the crazy software patents situation.
I also added [OT] to the
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 08:53, Caveat wrote:
> Right here, it seems like HTC *IS* losing the battle against Apple over
> this very patent! As we all appear to agree, there's an abundance of
> prior art, so why the heck has the initial determination gone to Apple?
I don't run the list, but I'd r
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 08:19 -0400, Rob wrote:
> That they were given it is sad, but if they were to try to enforce it
> against someone with enough money to make it worth their while, it's
> likely they would lose the patent.
http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2011/07/itc-judge-finds-htc-in-infring
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 07:45, Caveat wrote:
> But if you were to make a commercial product that looked through some
> data, picked out the email addresses (whether it uses regular
> expressions or not to achieve that is irrelevant), high-lighted them and
> allowed the user to perform some action
Ah i see !
The regular expression and the usage of grep command does this.
The grep command colorize with red the results.
Also if the text is multiline returns in color only the matches of
regexp.
i bring here, in Gambas, the output style of grep command not for the
colorize part but fo
No, as far as I know they haven't managed (yet! lol) to patent the use
of regular expressions.
You need to read the text of the patent or my summary here:
> recognising stuff (phone numbers, email addresses, web urls) in data,
> > high-lighting it, and allowing a user to interact with it and perf
ok.
But as you say, Apple's lawyers can knock the door of anyone who uses
regular expressions.
Is this true?
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 13:08 +0200, Caveat wrote:
> There is no problem in your code, nor in the mail addresses you show as
> examples, I was merely trying to point out a problem in the pa
There is no problem in your code, nor in the mail addresses you show as
examples, I was merely trying to point out a problem in the patent
system itself.
It seems as if Apple has manged to patent the "novel idea" of
recognising stuff (phone numbers, email addresses, web urls) in data,
high-lightin
Thanks Ian!
It would be more easy the RegExp to return an Array of results like grep
returns all the matches of multiline text.
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 20:13 +1000, Ian Haywood wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Demosthenes Koptsis
> wrote:
>
> > 2) The Pattern i use is:
> > (?i)\b[a-z0-9
sorry but i dont understand where is the patent problem.
There are many regexp which "recognize data" such emails.
So i think here is not the problem.
See for example
http://regexlib.com/Search.aspx?k=email&c=-1&m=-1&ps=20
If you mean the @yahoo.com emails this is an example.
i can change it l
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Demosthenes Koptsis
wrote:
> 2) The Pattern i use is:
> (?i)\b[a-z0-9._%\-]+@[a-z0-9._%\-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}\b
>
> 3) The result is only one email:
> di...@yahoo.gr
>
> and not the rest of them.
as you are only calling regexp once, you will only get one result, you
nee
I hope you realise that the work you're doing may result in you
infringing Apple's patent:
U.S. Patent No. 5,946,647 on a "system and method for performing an
action on a structure in computer-generated data" (in its complaint,
Apple provides examples such as the recognition of "phone numbers,
pos
i used also Multiline
http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb.pcre/regexp/multiline?v3
and DotAll
http://gambasdoc.org/help/comp/gb.pcre/regexp/dotall?v3
with this code
-
' Gambas class file
Private sRegExp As Regexp
Public Sub Form_Open()
Me.Center
End
Public Sub btnMat
16 matches
Mail list logo
